Utilization of Writing Assistance Tools in Research in Selected Higher Learning Institutions in the Philippines: A Text Mining Analysis

Cereneo Santiago, Steve I. Embang, Ricky B. Acanto, Kem Warren P. Ambojia, Maico Demi B. Aperocho, B. B. Balilo, Erwin L. Cahapin, Marjohn Thomas N. Conlu, Samson M. Lausa, Ester Y. Laput, B. A. Malabag, Jerby J. Paderes, Joan Katherine N. Romasanta
{"title":"Utilization of Writing Assistance Tools in Research in Selected Higher Learning Institutions in the Philippines: A Text Mining Analysis","authors":"Cereneo Santiago, Steve I. Embang, Ricky B. Acanto, Kem Warren P. Ambojia, Maico Demi B. Aperocho, B. B. Balilo, Erwin L. Cahapin, Marjohn Thomas N. Conlu, Samson M. Lausa, Ester Y. Laput, B. A. Malabag, Jerby J. Paderes, Joan Katherine N. Romasanta","doi":"10.26803/ijlter.22.11.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rise of artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education has sparked significant interest. Artificial intelligence offers opportunities for global learning, personalized instruction, and efficient resource management. In research writing, AI tools streamline processes, from a literature review to data analysis, enhancing efficiency and freeing up time for critical thinking. The researchers of this study used text mining techniques to extract patterns and trends of using writing assistance tools in research from the responses of 327 faculty researchers in various higher learning institutions in the Philippines. Unigram tokenization was used to present the 10 most frequently used words in the corpus, while the k-means elbow method was utilized to show the optimal number of clusters. Sentiment analysis was use to show the positive and negative implications of using writing assistance tools in research. The finding is that faculty respondents value writing assistance tools for enhancing research writing by expediting processes and improving clarity. The implementation of these tools in selected higher learning institutions may present difficulties, such as issues related to overreliance, and hinder students’ and researchers’ development of critical thinking and writing skills. Along with technological and resource challenges, these tools could inadvertently encourage plagiarism if not used responsibly. Cultural and language considerations are also relevant because these tools may not always be attuned to the specific linguistic and cultural nuances of Filipino academic writing. The results of this research may serve as a guide for researchers, educators, and software developers, who may use AI to streamline research writing processes in the educational sector.","PeriodicalId":37101,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research","volume":"77 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.11.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rise of artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education has sparked significant interest. Artificial intelligence offers opportunities for global learning, personalized instruction, and efficient resource management. In research writing, AI tools streamline processes, from a literature review to data analysis, enhancing efficiency and freeing up time for critical thinking. The researchers of this study used text mining techniques to extract patterns and trends of using writing assistance tools in research from the responses of 327 faculty researchers in various higher learning institutions in the Philippines. Unigram tokenization was used to present the 10 most frequently used words in the corpus, while the k-means elbow method was utilized to show the optimal number of clusters. Sentiment analysis was use to show the positive and negative implications of using writing assistance tools in research. The finding is that faculty respondents value writing assistance tools for enhancing research writing by expediting processes and improving clarity. The implementation of these tools in selected higher learning institutions may present difficulties, such as issues related to overreliance, and hinder students’ and researchers’ development of critical thinking and writing skills. Along with technological and resource challenges, these tools could inadvertently encourage plagiarism if not used responsibly. Cultural and language considerations are also relevant because these tools may not always be attuned to the specific linguistic and cultural nuances of Filipino academic writing. The results of this research may serve as a guide for researchers, educators, and software developers, who may use AI to streamline research writing processes in the educational sector.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
菲律宾部分高等院校在研究中使用写作辅助工具的情况:文本挖掘分析
人工智能(AI)在高等教育中的兴起引发了人们的极大兴趣。人工智能为全球化学习、个性化教学和高效资源管理提供了机遇。在研究写作中,人工智能工具简化了从文献综述到数据分析的流程,提高了效率,为批判性思维腾出了时间。本研究的研究人员使用文本挖掘技术,从菲律宾各高等院校的 327 名教研人员的回复中提取了在研究中使用写作辅助工具的模式和趋势。研究人员使用单字符标记化技术来呈现语料库中使用频率最高的 10 个单词,同时使用 k-means elbow 方法来显示最佳聚类数量。情感分析用于显示在研究中使用写作辅助工具的积极和消极影响。研究结果表明,教师受访者重视写作辅助工具,认为它可以加快写作进程,提高写作清晰度,从而提高科研写作水平。在选定的高等院校中使用这些工具可能会遇到一些困难,如过度依赖,以及阻碍学生和研究人员发展批判性思维和写作技巧等问题。除了技术和资源方面的挑战,如果不负责任地使用这些工具,可能会无意中鼓励剽窃行为。文化和语言方面的考虑也很重要,因为这些工具可能并不总能适应菲律宾学术写作在语言和文化方面的细微差别。这项研究的结果可以为研究人员、教育工作者和软件开发人员提供指导,他们可以利用人工智能简化教育部门的研究写作流程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
220
期刊最新文献
The Potential of Linguistic Landscapes for the Teaching of English as a Foreign Language in Cuenca, Ecuador Pre-service Teachers’ Perceptions and Practices of Learner Autonomy: A Case Study in Vietnam Reflection Analysis of Resilient and Sustainable Research and Publication Activities at the National University of Science & Technology, Oman during COVID-19 The Effectiveness of Team Teaching in Improving Reading Skill among Thai EFL Undergraduates and Their Attitudes toward this Strategy Testing the Healthy School Organisation Instrument (i-OS) and the Holistic Psychological Well-Being Model of School Organisations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1