Tissue Perfusion and the Braden Scale as Predictors of Pressure Injury Risk in the Intensive Care Unit Patient

Eileen Wong, Shirley Visperas, So Yung Choi, Mahealani Suapaia
{"title":"Tissue Perfusion and the Braden Scale as Predictors of Pressure Injury Risk in the Intensive Care Unit Patient","authors":"Eileen Wong, Shirley Visperas, So Yung Choi, Mahealani Suapaia","doi":"10.17479/jacs.2023.13.3.112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The national rate of pressure injury (PI) in the intensive care unit (ICU) 2016-2018 was 5.97%, while at one hospital in Honolulu, Hawaii it averaged 13%. The Braden scale is the gold standard PI risk assessment tool. Researchers have reported the Braden scale has limited value in the ICU setting and consider tissue perfusion to be the better indicator. The aim was to determine if tissue perfusion, as measured by noninvasive transcutaneous tissue oxygen levels, was a predictor of PI risk development.Methods: Electronic medical records of 161 patients admitted from January 1, 2017 to June 30, 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients’ characteristics were summarized using descriptive statistics. Bivariate associations with the development of PI were examined using Fisher’s exact test for the categorical variables, and Wilcoxon rank-sum test for the continuous variables. A multivariable logistic model was fitted for the development of PI with adjustments for potential confounders.Results: Of 161 patients, 125 met the inclusion criteria. Length of stay, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, use of vasopressors, and the Braden score were statistically significant predictors of PI risk development; tissue perfusion was not significant.Conclusion: ICU patients have a higher mortality and severity of illness. The Braden score guides implementation of PI preventative measures. The relationship between tissue perfusion and PI development may warrant further research. A broader clinical picture to incorporate the Braden scale and other risk factors in PI development such as Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score and use of vasopressors should be considered.","PeriodicalId":34662,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Acute Care Surgery","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Acute Care Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17479/jacs.2023.13.3.112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The national rate of pressure injury (PI) in the intensive care unit (ICU) 2016-2018 was 5.97%, while at one hospital in Honolulu, Hawaii it averaged 13%. The Braden scale is the gold standard PI risk assessment tool. Researchers have reported the Braden scale has limited value in the ICU setting and consider tissue perfusion to be the better indicator. The aim was to determine if tissue perfusion, as measured by noninvasive transcutaneous tissue oxygen levels, was a predictor of PI risk development.Methods: Electronic medical records of 161 patients admitted from January 1, 2017 to June 30, 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients’ characteristics were summarized using descriptive statistics. Bivariate associations with the development of PI were examined using Fisher’s exact test for the categorical variables, and Wilcoxon rank-sum test for the continuous variables. A multivariable logistic model was fitted for the development of PI with adjustments for potential confounders.Results: Of 161 patients, 125 met the inclusion criteria. Length of stay, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, use of vasopressors, and the Braden score were statistically significant predictors of PI risk development; tissue perfusion was not significant.Conclusion: ICU patients have a higher mortality and severity of illness. The Braden score guides implementation of PI preventative measures. The relationship between tissue perfusion and PI development may warrant further research. A broader clinical picture to incorporate the Braden scale and other risk factors in PI development such as Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score and use of vasopressors should be considered.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
组织灌注和布莱登量表作为重症监护病房患者压力损伤风险的预测指标
目的:2016-2018年全国重症监护室(ICU)压伤(PI)发生率为5.97%,而夏威夷檀香山一家医院的平均发生率为13%。布莱登量表是压伤风险评估的金标准工具。研究人员报告称,布莱登量表在重症监护室环境中价值有限,组织灌注被认为是更好的指标。该研究旨在确定通过无创经皮组织氧含量测量的组织灌注是否能预测 PI 风险的发展:回顾性审查了 2017 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 6 月 30 日收治的 161 名患者的电子病历。采用描述性统计方法总结了患者的特征。对分类变量采用费雪精确检验,对连续变量采用 Wilcoxon 秩和检验,检验与 PI 发展的二元关联。在对潜在的混杂因素进行调整后,针对 PI 的发展情况拟合了一个多变量逻辑模型:在 161 名患者中,125 人符合纳入标准。住院时间、急性生理学和慢性健康评估 II 评分、血管加压剂的使用以及布莱登评分在统计学上对 PI 风险的发生有显著的预测作用;组织灌注无显著影响:结论:重症监护病房患者的死亡率和病情严重程度都较高。结论:重症监护病房患者的死亡率和病情严重程度都较高,布莱登评分可为实施肺结核预防措施提供指导。组织灌注与 PI 发生之间的关系值得进一步研究。应考虑将 Braden 评分和 PI 发生的其他风险因素(如急性生理学和慢性健康评估 II 评分以及血管加压药的使用)纳入更广泛的临床研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
A Case of Acute Appendicitis Complicated by Necrotizing Fasciitis Requiring Abdominal Wall Reconstruction Management of Respiratory Failure in Shoulder Arthroscopy: A Case Report Difficult Small Bowel Bleeding in Surgical View The Association of Isolated Cecal Necrosis Symptoms with Acute Appendicitis: A Case Report The Effect of Polymyxin B-Immobilized Fiber Column Hemoperfusion for Sepsis: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1