Analysis of the humoral and cell-mediated immune response in heterologous and homologous SARS-CoV-2 revaccination

O. Drapkina, M. G. Chashchin, S. Berns, A. Gorshkov, O. V. Zhdanova, L. N. Ryzhakova, O. Litinskaya
{"title":"Analysis of the humoral and cell-mediated immune response in heterologous and homologous SARS-CoV-2 revaccination","authors":"O. Drapkina, M. G. Chashchin, S. Berns, A. Gorshkov, O. V. Zhdanova, L. N. Ryzhakova, O. Litinskaya","doi":"10.15829/1728-8800-2023-3764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The effectiveness of humoral and cell-mediated immunity as a result of primary vaccination for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome- related CoronaVirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), as well as the effectiveness of revaccination, is an important research problem. Studying and selecting optimal revaccination regimens will allow for long-term protection against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).Aim. To study the severity of humoral and cell-mediated immune response in various (homo- and heterologous) SARS-CoV-2 revaccination regimens as part of a prospective observational study 18 and 24 months after primary vaccination.Material and methods. The study was carried out within the prospective registry SATURN, which included individuals who received various SARS-CoV-2 revaccination (homo- and heterologous regimens) based on a combination of two following vaccines: Gam- COVID-Vac and CoviVac. Depending on the chosen regimen, 3 following groups were formed: group I (n=106) — participants with a homologous Gam- COVID-Vac regimen at each stage of vaccination and revaccination; group II (n=54) — participants with a heterologous regimen of sequential administration of Gam- COVID-Vac and CoviVac at the stage of vaccination and revaccination; group III (n=40) — participants with a homologous CoviVac regimen at the stage of vaccination and revaccination. At the first visit, all participants underwent a medical history collection, examination, and identification of potential contraindications to vaccination. At each subsequent visit, the level of anti- SARS-CoV-2 S-glycoprotein IgG antibodies was additionally determined. At visits 1, 3 and 5, the activity of specifically sensitized T-lymphocytes to the surface and nuclear antigen of SARS-CoV-2 was assessed. The IgG concentration was analyzed using the Abbott Architect SARS-CoV-2 IgG reagent kit, while T-cell immunity was assessed using the T-Spot.COVID test system (Oxford Immunotec). Visit 1 corresponded to the 1st stage of primary vaccination, visit 2 — 2nd stage of primary vaccination, visit 3 (12 months after visit 1) — 1st stage of revaccination, visit 3 (21 days after visit 3) — 2nd stage of revaccination, visit 5 –18 months after primary vaccination, visit 6 — 24 months after primary vaccination.Results. The average level of anti- SARS-CoV-2 S-glycoprotein IgG antibodies in group I at visit 3 was 520 [478; 540] BAU/ml, in group II — 499 [199,5; 540] BAU/ml and in group III — 456 [389; 509,5] BAU/ml. The values were comparable to those obtained at visit 6. However, in group II, IgG level at visit 5 was significantly higher compared to visit 6 (p=0,001). The greatest decrease by visit 5 in the number of active T cells responding to SARS-CoV-2 Spike stimulation was recorded in group III (5,00 [0,50; 11,50] vs 1,00 [0,00; 5,50]; relative changes -80,0%; p=0,067). Also, among patients in group III, there was a significant decrease in the number of active T cells responding to stimulation with SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid (10,00 [3,00; 22,50] vs 1,00 [0,00; 11,50]; relative changes -90,0%; p=0,0160). Participants in groups I and II demonstrated stable results on visit 5, relative to visit 3. In all studied groups, no significant relationship was found between IgG levels to SARS-CoV-2 S-glycopeptide and the number of active T cells. Strong positive relationships were found between the level of active T cells responding to SARS-CoV-2 spike stimulation and the level of active T cells responding to SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid stimulation: group I (ρ=0,807; p<0,001), group II (ρ=0,748; p<0,001) and group III (ρ=0,902; p<0,001).Conclusion. The use of homologous and heterologous SARS-CoV-2 vaccination demonstrates relatively stable level of both humoral and cell-mediated 18 and 24 months after the first stage of vaccination. Revaccination with a homologous regimen (CoviVac at both stages) ensured stable level of anti- SARS-CoV-2 S-glycopeptide IgG antibodies. However, this regimen was characterized by a significant decrease in the long-term period in the number of active T cells responding to stimulation of SARS-CoV-2 surface and nuclear antigen.","PeriodicalId":9545,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15829/1728-8800-2023-3764","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The effectiveness of humoral and cell-mediated immunity as a result of primary vaccination for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome- related CoronaVirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), as well as the effectiveness of revaccination, is an important research problem. Studying and selecting optimal revaccination regimens will allow for long-term protection against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).Aim. To study the severity of humoral and cell-mediated immune response in various (homo- and heterologous) SARS-CoV-2 revaccination regimens as part of a prospective observational study 18 and 24 months after primary vaccination.Material and methods. The study was carried out within the prospective registry SATURN, which included individuals who received various SARS-CoV-2 revaccination (homo- and heterologous regimens) based on a combination of two following vaccines: Gam- COVID-Vac and CoviVac. Depending on the chosen regimen, 3 following groups were formed: group I (n=106) — participants with a homologous Gam- COVID-Vac regimen at each stage of vaccination and revaccination; group II (n=54) — participants with a heterologous regimen of sequential administration of Gam- COVID-Vac and CoviVac at the stage of vaccination and revaccination; group III (n=40) — participants with a homologous CoviVac regimen at the stage of vaccination and revaccination. At the first visit, all participants underwent a medical history collection, examination, and identification of potential contraindications to vaccination. At each subsequent visit, the level of anti- SARS-CoV-2 S-glycoprotein IgG antibodies was additionally determined. At visits 1, 3 and 5, the activity of specifically sensitized T-lymphocytes to the surface and nuclear antigen of SARS-CoV-2 was assessed. The IgG concentration was analyzed using the Abbott Architect SARS-CoV-2 IgG reagent kit, while T-cell immunity was assessed using the T-Spot.COVID test system (Oxford Immunotec). Visit 1 corresponded to the 1st stage of primary vaccination, visit 2 — 2nd stage of primary vaccination, visit 3 (12 months after visit 1) — 1st stage of revaccination, visit 3 (21 days after visit 3) — 2nd stage of revaccination, visit 5 –18 months after primary vaccination, visit 6 — 24 months after primary vaccination.Results. The average level of anti- SARS-CoV-2 S-glycoprotein IgG antibodies in group I at visit 3 was 520 [478; 540] BAU/ml, in group II — 499 [199,5; 540] BAU/ml and in group III — 456 [389; 509,5] BAU/ml. The values were comparable to those obtained at visit 6. However, in group II, IgG level at visit 5 was significantly higher compared to visit 6 (p=0,001). The greatest decrease by visit 5 in the number of active T cells responding to SARS-CoV-2 Spike stimulation was recorded in group III (5,00 [0,50; 11,50] vs 1,00 [0,00; 5,50]; relative changes -80,0%; p=0,067). Also, among patients in group III, there was a significant decrease in the number of active T cells responding to stimulation with SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid (10,00 [3,00; 22,50] vs 1,00 [0,00; 11,50]; relative changes -90,0%; p=0,0160). Participants in groups I and II demonstrated stable results on visit 5, relative to visit 3. In all studied groups, no significant relationship was found between IgG levels to SARS-CoV-2 S-glycopeptide and the number of active T cells. Strong positive relationships were found between the level of active T cells responding to SARS-CoV-2 spike stimulation and the level of active T cells responding to SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid stimulation: group I (ρ=0,807; p<0,001), group II (ρ=0,748; p<0,001) and group III (ρ=0,902; p<0,001).Conclusion. The use of homologous and heterologous SARS-CoV-2 vaccination demonstrates relatively stable level of both humoral and cell-mediated 18 and 24 months after the first stage of vaccination. Revaccination with a homologous regimen (CoviVac at both stages) ensured stable level of anti- SARS-CoV-2 S-glycopeptide IgG antibodies. However, this regimen was characterized by a significant decrease in the long-term period in the number of active T cells responding to stimulation of SARS-CoV-2 surface and nuclear antigen.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
异源和同源 SARS-CoV-2 再接种的体液和细胞介导免疫反应分析
严重急性呼吸系统综合征相关冠状病毒 2 型(SARS-CoV-2)初次接种后体液免疫和细胞介导免疫的有效性以及再次接种的有效性是一个重要的研究课题。研究和选择最佳的再接种方案将使2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)得到长期保护。研究各种(同源和异源)SARS-CoV-2再接种方案中体液和细胞介导免疫反应的严重程度,作为初种疫苗接种18和24个月后前瞻性观察研究的一部分。这项研究是在前瞻性登记系统 SATURN 的范围内进行的,其中包括接受了基于以下两种疫苗组合的各种 SARS-CoV-2 再预防接种(同源和异源方案)的人:Gam- COVID-Vac 和 CoviVac。根据所选方案的不同,分为以下三组:第一组(人数=106)--在疫苗接种和再接种的各个阶段接种 Gam- COVID-Vac 的同源方案;第二组(人数=54)--在疫苗接种和再接种阶段接种 Gam- COVID-Vac 和 CoviVac 的异源方案;第三组(人数=40)--在疫苗接种和再接种阶段接种 CoviVac 的同源方案。在首次就诊时,所有参与者都接受了病史收集、检查和潜在接种禁忌症的鉴定。在随后的每次就诊中,都会额外测定抗 SARS-CoV-2 S 糖蛋白 IgG 抗体的水平。在第 1 次、第 3 次和第 5 次就诊时,评估特异性致敏 T 淋巴细胞对 SARS-CoV-2 表面抗原和核抗原的活性。用雅培 Architect SARS-CoV-2 IgG 试剂盒分析 IgG 浓度,用 T-Spot.COVID 测试系统(牛津免疫技术公司)评估 T 细胞免疫力。第 1 次接种对应于第一阶段的初次接种,第 2 次接种--第二阶段的初次接种,第 3 次接种(第 1 次接种后 12 个月)--第一阶段的再次接种,第 3 次接种(第 3 次接种后 21 天)--第二阶段的再次接种,第 5 次接种--初次接种后 18 个月,第 6 次接种--初次接种后 24 个月。第 3 次接种时,I 组抗 SARS-CoV-2 S 糖蛋白 IgG 抗体的平均水平为 520 [478; 540] BAU/ml,II 组为 499 [199,5; 540] BAU/ml,III 组为 456 [389; 509,5] BAU/ml。这些数值与第 6 次就诊时的数值相当。然而,在第二组中,第 5 次就诊时的 IgG 水平明显高于第 6 次就诊时的水平(P=0,001)。第 5 次就诊时,对 SARS-CoV-2 Spike 刺激有反应的活性 T 细胞数量下降幅度最大的是第 III 组(5,00 [0,50; 11,50] vs 1,00 [0,00; 5,50]; 相对变化 -80,0%; p=0,067)。此外,在第三组患者中,对 SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid 刺激有反应的活性 T 细胞数量明显减少(10,00 [3,00; 22,50] vs 1,00 [0,00; 11,50]; 相对变化 -90,0%; p=0,0160)。第一组和第二组的参与者在第五次就诊时的结果与第三次就诊时相比保持稳定。在所有研究组中,SARS-CoV-2 S-糖肽 IgG 含量与活性 T 细胞数量之间均无明显关系。对SARS-CoV-2尖峰刺激有反应的活性T细胞水平与对SARS-CoV-2核苷酸刺激有反应的活性T细胞水平之间存在很强的正相关关系:第一组(ρ=0,807;p<0,001)、第二组(ρ=0,748;p<0,001)和第三组(ρ=0,902;p<0,001)。使用同源和异源 SARS-CoV-2 疫苗接种,在第一阶段疫苗接种 18 和 24 个月后,体液和细胞介导水平相对稳定。再次接种同源疫苗(两个阶段都接种 CoviVac)确保了抗 SARS-CoV-2 S-糖肽 IgG 抗体水平的稳定。然而,在长期接种过程中,对 SARS-CoV-2 表面抗原和核抗原刺激做出反应的活性 T 细胞数量显著减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention
Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
155
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The most important objectives of the journal are: the generalization of scientific and practical achievements in the field of cardiology, increasing scientific and practical skills of cardiologists. The scientific concept of publication does the publication of modern achievements in the field of epidemiology, prevention and treatment of cardiovascular diseases, the results of research, national and international clinical trials. For publication in the journal are invited both domestic and foreign scientists and clinicians working in the field of cardiology, as well as doctors of other specialties. The magazine covers various issues in cardiology and related specialties. Each issue is prepared by Executive editor of the issue, a respected specialist in the field of epidemiology, prevention and treatment of cardiovascular diseases. The main focus of the publication — scientific articles on original research, the pharmacotherapy of cardiovascular disease, new diagnostic methods. All members of the group of authors should meet all four criteria of authorship set forth in the ICMJE recommendations: 1) concept and design development or data analysis and interpretation, and 2) manuscript justification or verification of critical intellectual content, and 3) final approval for publication of the manuscript, and 4) consent to be responsible for all aspects of the work, and assume that issues relating to the thoroughness and diligent execution of any part of the study submitted are duly investigated and resolved. Great importance the editors attached to the preparation of scientific papers by groups of authors at a high level, literacy, authors, and their ownership information, availability of research results not only to colleagues in Russia, but also abroad.
期刊最新文献
Biomarkers and subclinical left ventricular dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes without clinical manifestations of cardiovascular diseases Cardiovascular complications in non-cardiac surgery: what remains out of sight? Is meta-analysis the "top of the evidence pyramid" in cardiology? Consensus statement on the management of patients with asymptomatic hyperuricemia in general medical practice Multidisciplinary approach in the differential diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy: a case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1