Comparison of Open Lichtenstein Repair and Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal of Inguinal Hernia: A Pragmatic RCT in Bangladesh

SM Iftekhar Uddeen Sagar, Mohammad Akram Hossain, Md Abdullah Yusuf, Rabeya Sultana, Md Abul Kalam Azad
{"title":"Comparison of Open Lichtenstein Repair and Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal of Inguinal Hernia: A Pragmatic RCT in Bangladesh","authors":"SM Iftekhar Uddeen Sagar, Mohammad Akram Hossain, Md Abdullah Yusuf, Rabeya Sultana, Md Abul Kalam Azad","doi":"10.3329/jcamr.v10i1.69954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair has emerged as an effective alternative to open Lichtenstein mesh repair for inguinal hernias. Objective: The purpose of the present study was to compare the surgical outcomes of laparoscopic trans-abdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) and open Lichtenstein mesh repair for the treatment of inguinal hernia. Methodology: This single centered, pragmatic randomized controlled trial was conducted in the Department of Surgery at 300 bed hospital, Narayanganj, Bangladesh from January 2018 to June 2020 for a period of two and half year. Patients who were presented with reducible, primary/recurrent, complete/incomplete inguinal hernias among male and female in more than or equal to 18 years of age were selected as study population. Lichtenstein mesh repair was performed which was compared with the laparoscopy group. Open Lichtenstein repair was done under spinal anesthesia with lightweight poly propylene mesh. Laparoscopy was performed by trans-abdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) technique under general anesthesia and heavy weight mesh was used. The hospital stay, operating time, post-operative complications like superficial wound infection, seroma formation, scrotal swelling as well as early recurrence and chronic groin pain were compared among these group. Results: A total number of 90 patients presented with inguinal hernia were recruited for this study of which TAPP was performed in 25 cases and 65 cases were undergone Lichtenstein repair. The mean age of laparoscopy and open group of patients were 49.28±9.9 years and 55.05±14.4 years respectively (p-0.03). The mean operation time was 85±10.31 minutes and 52.1±15.36 minutes in laparoscopy and open group respectively (p-0.000). The mean post-operative hospital stay was 2.9±0.78 days and 2.9±0.71 days in laparoscopy and open group respectively (p-0.94). In this study 21 (23.3%) patients developed 25 different early and late post-operative complications, out of which 15 (23.1%) in open group and 06 (23.3%) in laparoscopy group (p-0.52). One early recurrence was reported after 6 months follow up in laparoscopy group. Chronic groin pain was reported in 7 cases of which 5 (7.7%) cases in open group and only 2 (8.0%) cases in laparoscopy group (p-0.002). Conclusion: In conclusion the surgical outcomes of laparoscopic TAPP performed by a young surgeon in Bangladesh has given a clinically better result than open Lichtenstein repair considering hospital stay, seroma formation, wound infection, scrotal swelling and chronic groin pain. Journal of Current and Advance Medical Research, January 2023;10(1):35-40","PeriodicalId":15413,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Current and Advance Medical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Current and Advance Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/jcamr.v10i1.69954","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair has emerged as an effective alternative to open Lichtenstein mesh repair for inguinal hernias. Objective: The purpose of the present study was to compare the surgical outcomes of laparoscopic trans-abdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) and open Lichtenstein mesh repair for the treatment of inguinal hernia. Methodology: This single centered, pragmatic randomized controlled trial was conducted in the Department of Surgery at 300 bed hospital, Narayanganj, Bangladesh from January 2018 to June 2020 for a period of two and half year. Patients who were presented with reducible, primary/recurrent, complete/incomplete inguinal hernias among male and female in more than or equal to 18 years of age were selected as study population. Lichtenstein mesh repair was performed which was compared with the laparoscopy group. Open Lichtenstein repair was done under spinal anesthesia with lightweight poly propylene mesh. Laparoscopy was performed by trans-abdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) technique under general anesthesia and heavy weight mesh was used. The hospital stay, operating time, post-operative complications like superficial wound infection, seroma formation, scrotal swelling as well as early recurrence and chronic groin pain were compared among these group. Results: A total number of 90 patients presented with inguinal hernia were recruited for this study of which TAPP was performed in 25 cases and 65 cases were undergone Lichtenstein repair. The mean age of laparoscopy and open group of patients were 49.28±9.9 years and 55.05±14.4 years respectively (p-0.03). The mean operation time was 85±10.31 minutes and 52.1±15.36 minutes in laparoscopy and open group respectively (p-0.000). The mean post-operative hospital stay was 2.9±0.78 days and 2.9±0.71 days in laparoscopy and open group respectively (p-0.94). In this study 21 (23.3%) patients developed 25 different early and late post-operative complications, out of which 15 (23.1%) in open group and 06 (23.3%) in laparoscopy group (p-0.52). One early recurrence was reported after 6 months follow up in laparoscopy group. Chronic groin pain was reported in 7 cases of which 5 (7.7%) cases in open group and only 2 (8.0%) cases in laparoscopy group (p-0.002). Conclusion: In conclusion the surgical outcomes of laparoscopic TAPP performed by a young surgeon in Bangladesh has given a clinically better result than open Lichtenstein repair considering hospital stay, seroma formation, wound infection, scrotal swelling and chronic groin pain. Journal of Current and Advance Medical Research, January 2023;10(1):35-40
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开放式 Lichtenstein 修复术与腹腔镜经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝气修复术的比较:孟加拉国的一项务实 RCT
背景:腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术已成为腹股沟疝开腹利希滕斯坦网片修补术的有效替代方法。研究目的本研究旨在比较腹腔镜经腹腹膜前(TAPP)和开放式 Lichtenstein 网片修补术治疗腹股沟疝的手术效果。方法:这项单一中心、务实的随机对照试验于 2018 年 1 月至 2020 年 6 月在孟加拉国纳拉扬甘杰 300 张病床医院的外科进行,为期两年半。研究对象为年龄大于或等于 18 岁、患有可复性、原发性/复发性、完全性/不完全性腹股沟疝的男女患者。与腹腔镜手术组相比,腹股沟疝修补术采用的是 Lichtenstein 网片修补术。开放式 Lichtenstein 修复术在脊髓麻醉下进行,使用的是轻质聚丙烯网片。腹腔镜手术在全身麻醉下通过经腹腹膜前(TAPP)技术进行,使用的是重型网片。比较了这两组患者的住院时间、手术时间、术后并发症(如浅表伤口感染、血清肿形成、阴囊肿胀以及早期复发和慢性腹股沟疼痛)。结果本研究共招募了 90 名腹股沟疝患者,其中 25 例进行了 TAPP 手术,65 例进行了 Lichtenstein 修补术。腹腔镜组和开腹组患者的平均年龄分别为(49.28±9.9)岁和(55.05±14.4)岁(P-0.03)。腹腔镜组和开腹组的平均手术时间分别为(85±10.31)分钟和(52.1±15.36)分钟(P-0.000)。腹腔镜组和开腹组的术后平均住院时间分别为(2.9±0.78)天和(2.9±0.71)天(P-0.94)。在这项研究中,21 例(23.3%)患者出现了 25 种不同的术后早期和晚期并发症,其中开腹组 15 例(23.1%),腹腔镜组 06 例(23.3%)(P-0.52)。腹腔镜手术组在随访 6 个月后出现了一次早期复发。7例患者出现慢性腹股沟疼痛,其中开腹组5例(7.7%),腹腔镜组仅2例(8.0%)(P-0.002)。结论总之,考虑到住院时间、血清肿形成、伤口感染、阴囊肿胀和慢性腹股沟疼痛等因素,孟加拉一位年轻外科医生实施的腹腔镜 TAPP 手术效果优于开腹 Lichtenstein 修复术。最新医学研究期刊》,2023 年 1 月;10(1):35-40
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Miniperc and Standard Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Treatment of Renal Stone: An Open Level Parallel Arm Randomized Control Trial Characteristics of Carotid Artery among Ischemic Heart Disease Patients with or without Diabetes Mellitus Embracing the Potential of Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery: A Path to Hope and Progress Age and Gender Differences with Clinical Presentation of Patients with Histopathological and CT-Scan Confirmed Parapharyngeal Mass Anthropometric Analysis Between Naso Aural Inclination and Their Correlation in Bangladeshi Buddhist Rakhain Ethnic Females
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1