The 2021 La Palma volcanic eruption and its impact on ionospheric scintillation as measured from GNSS reference stations, GNSS-R and GNSS-RO

C. Molina, Badr-Eddine Boudriki Semlali, Guillermo González-Casado, Hyuk Park, Adriano Camps
{"title":"The 2021 La Palma volcanic eruption and its impact on ionospheric scintillation as measured from GNSS reference stations, GNSS-R and GNSS-RO","authors":"C. Molina, Badr-Eddine Boudriki Semlali, Guillermo González-Casado, Hyuk Park, Adriano Camps","doi":"10.5194/nhess-23-3671-2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Ionospheric disturbances induced by seismic activity have been studied in recent years by many authors, showing an impact both before and after the occurrence of earthquakes. In this study, the ionospheric scintillation produced by the 2021 La Palma volcano eruption is analyzed. The Cumbre Vieja volcano was active from 19 September to 13 December 2021, and many earthquakes of magnitude 3–4 were recorded, with some of them reaching magnitude 5. Three methods, GNSS reference monitoring, GNSS reflectometry (GNSS-R) from NASA CYGNSS, and GNSS radio occultation (GNSS-RO) from COSMIC and Spire constellations, are used to compare and evaluate their sensitivity as proxies of earthquakes associated with the volcanic eruption. To compare the seismic activity with ionospheric scintillation, seismic energy release, and 95th percentile of the intensity scintillation parameter (S4), measurements have been computed at 6 h intervals for the whole duration of the volcanic eruption. GNSS-RO has shown the best correlation between earthquake energy and S4, with values up to 0.09 when the perturbations occur around 18 h after the seismic activity. GNSS reference monitoring station data also show some correlation 18 h and 7–8 d after. As expected, GNSS-R is the one that shows the smallest correlation, as the ionospheric signatures get masked by the signature of the surface where the reflection is taking place. Additionally, the three methods show a smaller correlation during the week before earthquakes. Given the small magnitude of the seismic activity, the correlation is barely detectable in this situation, and thus would be difficult to use in any application to find earthquake proxies.","PeriodicalId":508073,"journal":{"name":"Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-3671-2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. Ionospheric disturbances induced by seismic activity have been studied in recent years by many authors, showing an impact both before and after the occurrence of earthquakes. In this study, the ionospheric scintillation produced by the 2021 La Palma volcano eruption is analyzed. The Cumbre Vieja volcano was active from 19 September to 13 December 2021, and many earthquakes of magnitude 3–4 were recorded, with some of them reaching magnitude 5. Three methods, GNSS reference monitoring, GNSS reflectometry (GNSS-R) from NASA CYGNSS, and GNSS radio occultation (GNSS-RO) from COSMIC and Spire constellations, are used to compare and evaluate their sensitivity as proxies of earthquakes associated with the volcanic eruption. To compare the seismic activity with ionospheric scintillation, seismic energy release, and 95th percentile of the intensity scintillation parameter (S4), measurements have been computed at 6 h intervals for the whole duration of the volcanic eruption. GNSS-RO has shown the best correlation between earthquake energy and S4, with values up to 0.09 when the perturbations occur around 18 h after the seismic activity. GNSS reference monitoring station data also show some correlation 18 h and 7–8 d after. As expected, GNSS-R is the one that shows the smallest correlation, as the ionospheric signatures get masked by the signature of the surface where the reflection is taking place. Additionally, the three methods show a smaller correlation during the week before earthquakes. Given the small magnitude of the seismic activity, the correlation is barely detectable in this situation, and thus would be difficult to use in any application to find earthquake proxies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2021 年拉帕尔马火山爆发及其对电离层闪烁的影响,从全球导航卫星系统基准台站、全球导航卫星系统-R 和全球导航卫星系统-RO 测得的数据
摘要近年来,许多学者对地震活动引起的电离层扰动进行了研究,结果表明地震发生前后都会产生影响。本研究分析了 2021 年拉帕尔马火山爆发产生的电离层闪烁。Cumbre Vieja 火山在 2021 年 9 月 19 日至 12 月 13 日期间处于活跃期,记录了许多 3-4 级地震,其中一些达到 5 级。使用了三种方法,即全球导航卫星系统基准监测、美国航天局 CYGNSS 的全球导航卫星系统反射测量法(GNSS-R)以及 COSMIC 和 Spire 星座的全球导航卫星系统无线电掩星法(GNSS-RO),以比较和评估它们作为与火山爆发相关的地震代用指标的灵敏度。为了比较地震活动与电离层闪烁、地震能量释放和强度闪烁参数(S4)的第 95 百分位数,在整个火山爆发期间每隔 6 小时进行一次测量。GNSS-RO 显示了地震能量与 S4 之间的最佳相关性,当扰动发生在地震活动后 18 小时左右时,其值高达 0.09。全球导航卫星系统基准监测站的数据也显示了 18 h 和 7-8 d 后的一些相关性。不出所料,GNSS-R 显示的相关性最小,因为电离层特征被发生反射的地表特征所掩盖。此外,这三种方法在地震前一周显示的相关性较小。由于地震活动的规模较小,在这种情况下几乎检测不到相关性,因此很难用于寻找地震代用指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Flood occurrence and impact models for socioeconomic applications over Canada and the United States Harmonizing seismicity information in Central Asian countries: earthquake catalogue and active faults Model-based assessment of climate change impact on inland flood risk at the German North Sea coast caused by compounding storm tide and precipitation events Modelling crop hail damage footprints with single-polarization radar: the roles of spatial resolution, hail intensity, and cropland density A glacial lake outburst flood risk assessment for the Phochhu river basin, Bhutan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1