Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Tipe Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Pokok Bahasan Bangun Ruang Sisi Datar

A. Ananda, Sri Sulasteri, Andi Dian Angriani, Andi Kusumayanti, A. Halimah
{"title":"Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Tipe Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Pokok Bahasan Bangun Ruang Sisi Datar","authors":"A. Ananda, Sri Sulasteri, Andi Dian Angriani, Andi Kusumayanti, A. Halimah","doi":"10.24252/asma.v5i2.42850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to determine the process and analyze the quality of the HOTS-type test instrument development on flat side space and measure students' higher-order thinking skills. This type of research is research and development with the Formative Research (Tessmeer) model. The test subjects in this study were class XI.3 students at SMP Negeri 30 Makassar, totaling 30 students. Based on the research results, it is known that 1) the development process using the Formative Research (Tessmeer) model through 4 stages, namely the preliminary stage, the self-evaluation stage, the prototyping stage, and the field test stage. 2) the quality of test development is declared valid with a CVR (Content Validity Index) value, the average total score is 1 with a very appropriate category or is in the interval 0.68-1.00, practically based on the results of the questionnaire analysis of student responses 89.07% with the response category \"Very Positive”, reliable with an average of 0.752 and 0.866 in the high category (reliable), the average difficulty level of the total score is 0.69 and 0.49 in the medium category, and the different power of the average total score is 0.42 and 0.49 in the good category. 3) students' critical thinking ability averaged 67.61, which was in the good category. Thus, this HOTS-type test instrument can be used to measure students' high-order thinking skills.","PeriodicalId":411054,"journal":{"name":"Al asma : Journal of Islamic Education","volume":"150 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al asma : Journal of Islamic Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24252/asma.v5i2.42850","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to determine the process and analyze the quality of the HOTS-type test instrument development on flat side space and measure students' higher-order thinking skills. This type of research is research and development with the Formative Research (Tessmeer) model. The test subjects in this study were class XI.3 students at SMP Negeri 30 Makassar, totaling 30 students. Based on the research results, it is known that 1) the development process using the Formative Research (Tessmeer) model through 4 stages, namely the preliminary stage, the self-evaluation stage, the prototyping stage, and the field test stage. 2) the quality of test development is declared valid with a CVR (Content Validity Index) value, the average total score is 1 with a very appropriate category or is in the interval 0.68-1.00, practically based on the results of the questionnaire analysis of student responses 89.07% with the response category "Very Positive”, reliable with an average of 0.752 and 0.866 in the high category (reliable), the average difficulty level of the total score is 0.69 and 0.49 in the medium category, and the different power of the average total score is 0.42 and 0.49 in the good category. 3) students' critical thinking ability averaged 67.61, which was in the good category. Thus, this HOTS-type test instrument can be used to measure students' high-order thinking skills.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开发以平面空间建筑为主题的高阶思维能力(HOTS)测试工具
本研究旨在确定平面空间 HOTS 型测试工具的开发过程并分析其质量,测量学生的高阶思维能力。这类研究属于形成性研究(Tessmeer)模式下的研究与开发。本研究的测试对象是望加锡 SMP Negeri 30 的 XI.3 班学生,共 30 人。根据研究结果可知:1)使用形成性研究(泰斯梅尔)模式的开发过程经历了 4 个阶段,即初步阶段、自我评价阶段、原型设计阶段和实地测试阶段。2) 测试开发的质量以 CVR(内容效度指数)值宣布有效,平均总分为 1,类别非常恰当或在 0.68-1.00 的区间内,实际上,根据对学生答卷的问卷分析结果 89.07%,回答类别为 "非常肯定",可靠度平均为0.752,高类别(可靠度)为0.866,总分平均难度为0.69,中类别为0.49,总分平均不同功率为0.42,好类别为0.49。3)学生的批判性思维能力平均值为 67.61,属于良好范畴。因此,该 HOTS 型测验工具可用于测量学生的高阶思维能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Efektivitas Model Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition dalam Pembelajaran Mengubah Teks Wawancara Menjadi Karangan Narasi Deskripsi Pengaitan Konteks dan Pengetahuan Matematika: Tinjauan Kemampuan Literasi Numerasi Efektivitas Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Missouri Mathematics Project dengan Metode Two Stay Two Stray terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Peserta Didik Pengaruh Media Jembatan Pelangi terhadap Perkembangan Aspek Kognitif Anak Usia Dini Pengaruh Penerapan Model Pembelajaran RADEC (Read, Answer, Discuss, Explain, Create) terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Matematis Peserta Didik
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1