Ultrasound-guided platelet-rich plasma injection versus steroids injection for pain relief in partial rotator cuff tears

IF 0.6 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2023-11-27 DOI:10.1080/11101849.2023.2280944
Radwa S. Raslan, Dorreya M. Fekry, Tarek M. Sarhan, Mohamed M. El Sawy, Moutaz E. Elabbasy
{"title":"Ultrasound-guided platelet-rich plasma injection versus steroids injection for pain relief in partial rotator cuff tears","authors":"Radwa S. Raslan, Dorreya M. Fekry, Tarek M. Sarhan, Mohamed M. El Sawy, Moutaz E. Elabbasy","doi":"10.1080/11101849.2023.2280944","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background Platelet-rich plasma injection has become an effective treatment for partial rotator cuff tears. This study evaluates the efficacy of PRP versus steroids injection in pain relief for partial rotator cuff tears. Study design Prospective clinical trial. Setting Alexandria Main University Hospital. Patients and methods Sixty patients with symptomatic partial RCTs undergoing US-guided subacromial injection were randomly allocated into two equal groups: either steroids or PRP. Pain score, shoulder function, failure rate after injection, and complications were recorded. Results VAS score was significantly lower in the steroid group at week 2 follow-up than the PRP group (p 0.001). However, it was shorter, extended for 8 weeks in steroid in comparison to 4 months in PRP group. There was an insignificant difference among groups in the simple shoulder test at 2 and 4 weeks follow-up, and the test was significantly higher in PRP group at 6, 8, 12 weeks, and 4 month follow-up (P = 0.049, 0.001, 0.001, 0.001). Pain did not improve in six patients in steroid group and one patient in PRP group. Pain on injection was reported by six patients in the steroid group and 13 patients in PRP group (p = 0.052). Elevated blood sugar was significantly higher in the steroid group after the injection (p 0.001). Conclusion Subacromial PRP injection may have a prolonged analgesic effect and superior shoulder functional improvement than steroids in patients with partial RCTs.","PeriodicalId":11437,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":"1 1","pages":"900 - 905"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/11101849.2023.2280944","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Platelet-rich plasma injection has become an effective treatment for partial rotator cuff tears. This study evaluates the efficacy of PRP versus steroids injection in pain relief for partial rotator cuff tears. Study design Prospective clinical trial. Setting Alexandria Main University Hospital. Patients and methods Sixty patients with symptomatic partial RCTs undergoing US-guided subacromial injection were randomly allocated into two equal groups: either steroids or PRP. Pain score, shoulder function, failure rate after injection, and complications were recorded. Results VAS score was significantly lower in the steroid group at week 2 follow-up than the PRP group (p 0.001). However, it was shorter, extended for 8 weeks in steroid in comparison to 4 months in PRP group. There was an insignificant difference among groups in the simple shoulder test at 2 and 4 weeks follow-up, and the test was significantly higher in PRP group at 6, 8, 12 weeks, and 4 month follow-up (P = 0.049, 0.001, 0.001, 0.001). Pain did not improve in six patients in steroid group and one patient in PRP group. Pain on injection was reported by six patients in the steroid group and 13 patients in PRP group (p = 0.052). Elevated blood sugar was significantly higher in the steroid group after the injection (p 0.001). Conclusion Subacromial PRP injection may have a prolonged analgesic effect and superior shoulder functional improvement than steroids in patients with partial RCTs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超声引导下注射富血小板血浆与注射类固醇缓解肩袖部分撕裂疼痛的比较
ABSTRACT 背景 富血小板血浆注射已成为治疗部分肩袖撕裂的有效方法。本研究评估了 PRP 与类固醇注射在缓解肩袖部分撕裂疼痛方面的疗效。研究设计 前瞻性临床试验。地点: 亚历山大主大学医院。患者和方法 60 名有症状的部分肩袖撕裂患者在 US 引导下接受肩峰下注射,随机分配到两个相同的组别:类固醇或 PRP。记录疼痛评分、肩关节功能、注射失败率和并发症。结果 第 2 周随访时,类固醇组的 VAS 评分明显低于 PRP 组(P 0.001)。不过,类固醇组的疗程较短,为 8 周,而 PRP 组为 4 个月。在随访 2 周和 4 周时,各组间肩关节简单测试的差异不明显,而在随访 6、8、12 周和 4 个月时,PRP 组的测试结果明显更高(P = 0.049、0.001、0.001、0.001)。类固醇组有 6 名患者的疼痛没有改善,PRP 组有 1 名患者的疼痛没有改善。类固醇组有 6 名患者报告注射时疼痛,PRP 组有 13 名患者报告注射时疼痛(P = 0.052)。类固醇组患者注射后血糖升高明显高于 PRP 组(P 0.001)。结论 在部分 RCT 患者中,肩峰下 PRP 注射可延长镇痛效果,对肩关节功能的改善优于类固醇。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia
Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
78
期刊最新文献
Intrathecal levo-bupivacaine versus hyperbaric bupivacaine for inguinal hernia repairs in ex-preterm infants: A double blinded randomized prospective study Comparison of two different methods as reliable predictors of successful caudal block in children Effect of sevoflurane versus propofol on early cognitive functions in elderly patients after lumbar disc surgery Muscle wasting assessed by ultrasound versus scoring systems as early predictor of outcomes of intensive care unit stay in critically ill patients Posterior quadratus lumborum versus caudal epidural block for perioperative analgesia in pediatric patients undergoing upper abdominal surgeries: Arandomized, double-blind trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1