Free apps and paid apps: monetization strategies for health apps in the Portuguese market

Natália Lemos, Cândida Sofia Machado, Cláudia Cardoso
{"title":"Free apps and paid apps: monetization strategies for health apps in the Portuguese market","authors":"Natália Lemos, Cândida Sofia Machado, Cláudia Cardoso","doi":"10.1108/ijphm-01-2023-0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose The rapid advancement of technology has transformed the health-care industry and enabled the emergence of m-Health solutions such as health apps. The viability and success of these apps depends on the definition of a monetization model appropriate to their specificities. In this sense, the purpose of this paper is to study the mechanisms of monetization of health apps, to stablish how alternative revenues determine if a health app is to be free or paid. Design/methodology/approach Probability models are used to identify the factors that explain if a health app is free or paid. Findings Results show that the presence of alternative monetization mechanisms negatively impacts the likelihood of a health app being paid for. The use of personal data to customize advertising (the monetization of “privacy capital”) or the inclusion of ads on the app are alternative means of monetization with potential to decrease the likelihood of a health app being paid for. The possibility of in-app purchases has a lower negative impact on the probability of a health app being paid for. The choice of platform to commercialize an app is also a strategic decision that influences the likelihood of an app being paid for. Originality/value This work stands out for bringing together the two largest platforms present in Portugal and for focusing on the perspective of revenue and monetization of health apps and not on the perspective of downloads.","PeriodicalId":51798,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Marketing","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijphm-01-2023-0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The rapid advancement of technology has transformed the health-care industry and enabled the emergence of m-Health solutions such as health apps. The viability and success of these apps depends on the definition of a monetization model appropriate to their specificities. In this sense, the purpose of this paper is to study the mechanisms of monetization of health apps, to stablish how alternative revenues determine if a health app is to be free or paid. Design/methodology/approach Probability models are used to identify the factors that explain if a health app is free or paid. Findings Results show that the presence of alternative monetization mechanisms negatively impacts the likelihood of a health app being paid for. The use of personal data to customize advertising (the monetization of “privacy capital”) or the inclusion of ads on the app are alternative means of monetization with potential to decrease the likelihood of a health app being paid for. The possibility of in-app purchases has a lower negative impact on the probability of a health app being paid for. The choice of platform to commercialize an app is also a strategic decision that influences the likelihood of an app being paid for. Originality/value This work stands out for bringing together the two largest platforms present in Portugal and for focusing on the perspective of revenue and monetization of health apps and not on the perspective of downloads.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
免费应用程序和付费应用程序:葡萄牙市场健康应用程序的货币化战略
目的 技术的飞速发展改变了医疗保健行业,使健康应用程序等移动医疗解决方案得以出现。这些应用程序的可行性和成功与否取决于能否确定适合其特点的货币化模式。从这个意义上说,本文的目的是研究健康应用程序的货币化机制,以确定替代收入如何决定健康应用程序是免费还是付费。 设计/方法/途径 使用概率模型来确定健康应用程序是免费还是付费的因素。 结果 结果表明,替代货币化机制的存在会对健康应用付费的可能性产生负面影响。使用个人数据定制广告("隐私资本 "的货币化)或在应用程序中加入广告是其他货币化手段,有可能降低健康应用程序被付费的可能性。应用程序内购买的可能性对健康应用程序被付费的可能性的负面影响较小。选择何种平台将应用程序商业化也是一项战略决策,会影响应用程序获得付费的可能性。 独创性/价值 这项工作的突出之处在于汇集了葡萄牙目前最大的两个平台,并侧重于健康应用程序的收入和货币化角度,而非下载量角度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Progress and trends in healthcare marketing strategy (2018–2022): A descriptive and bibliometric analysis of the Web of Science (WOS) dataset Modelling organ donation information adoption among Malaysian youth using the information adoption model (IAM) The impact of word-of-mouth (WOM) on attitudes, behavioural intentions, and actual usage of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) among early and late adopters Does the pharmaceutical industry’s growth relate to Bangladesh’s macroeconomic stability? Food as an ingredient of well-being: from food and well-being to food well-being (FWB): a comparative study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1