Who Should Fill Out a Pediatric PROM? Psychometric Assessment From a Clinical Perspective in 567 Children With a Cleft

FACE Pub Date : 2023-11-25 DOI:10.1177/27325016231209051
S. Ombashi, V. V. van Roey, Jolanda M. E. Okkerse, Mariska van Veen-van der Hoek, Esther E. B. van Oers-Hazelzet, A. B. Mink van der Molen, S. L. Versnel
{"title":"Who Should Fill Out a Pediatric PROM? Psychometric Assessment From a Clinical Perspective in 567 Children With a Cleft","authors":"S. Ombashi, V. V. van Roey, Jolanda M. E. Okkerse, Mariska van Veen-van der Hoek, Esther E. B. van Oers-Hazelzet, A. B. Mink van der Molen, S. L. Versnel","doi":"10.1177/27325016231209051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background:The CLEFT-Q is a questionnaire developed for patients with a cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P). Numerous scales have been implemented as part of the ICHOM Standard Set for CL/P. Although validated for completion by patients only, clinicians noted that caregivers are often involved in completion of the scales. Aim of the study was to promote further standardization of Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in pediatric patients by examining the preferences of patients and parents concerning the reporter type. Moreover, possible discrepancies in outcomes between reporter types were explored. Methods: Data from 567 patients with CL/P and their caregivers that completed scales of the CLEFT-Q questionnaire were collected. Reporter group sizes and proportions were examined at the ages of 8, 12, and 15 years to determine the preferred manner of completion. Mean outcomes were analyzed per scale at the 3 ages, and compared between the 3 reporter groups: “patient,” “caregiver,” and “together.” Results: In all age-groups, the majority completed the PROMs together. Concerning the reporter types per age-group, an upward trend was seen in the proportion of patients that completed the scales alone. In the caregiver group, a downward trend was observed, and the highest proportion of parents that completed the scales was found at age 8. No significant differences were found between the reporter types in any of the scales. Conclusion: Even if a PROM questionnaire is validated for patient report only, it is recommended to record the reporter type when a pediatric PROM is completed. In order to capture outcomes that represent the patient’s voice validly and reliably, though with support of the caregiver, a pediatric PROM should be filled out by the patient alone and thereafter evaluated with the caregiver(s). Concerning the CLEFT-Q, there seems to be demand for a validated parent-version of the scales.","PeriodicalId":508736,"journal":{"name":"FACE","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FACE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/27325016231209051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:The CLEFT-Q is a questionnaire developed for patients with a cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P). Numerous scales have been implemented as part of the ICHOM Standard Set for CL/P. Although validated for completion by patients only, clinicians noted that caregivers are often involved in completion of the scales. Aim of the study was to promote further standardization of Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in pediatric patients by examining the preferences of patients and parents concerning the reporter type. Moreover, possible discrepancies in outcomes between reporter types were explored. Methods: Data from 567 patients with CL/P and their caregivers that completed scales of the CLEFT-Q questionnaire were collected. Reporter group sizes and proportions were examined at the ages of 8, 12, and 15 years to determine the preferred manner of completion. Mean outcomes were analyzed per scale at the 3 ages, and compared between the 3 reporter groups: “patient,” “caregiver,” and “together.” Results: In all age-groups, the majority completed the PROMs together. Concerning the reporter types per age-group, an upward trend was seen in the proportion of patients that completed the scales alone. In the caregiver group, a downward trend was observed, and the highest proportion of parents that completed the scales was found at age 8. No significant differences were found between the reporter types in any of the scales. Conclusion: Even if a PROM questionnaire is validated for patient report only, it is recommended to record the reporter type when a pediatric PROM is completed. In order to capture outcomes that represent the patient’s voice validly and reliably, though with support of the caregiver, a pediatric PROM should be filled out by the patient alone and thereafter evaluated with the caregiver(s). Concerning the CLEFT-Q, there seems to be demand for a validated parent-version of the scales.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
谁应该填写儿科 PROM?从临床角度对 567 名唇裂儿童进行心理计量评估
背景:CLEFT-Q 是专为唇裂和/或腭裂 (CL/P) 患者开发的调查问卷。作为 ICHOM CL/P 标准集的一部分,已实施了许多量表。虽然该量表只供患者填写,但临床医生注意到护理人员也经常参与填写。本研究旨在通过研究患者和家长对报告者类型的偏好,促进儿科患者患者报告结果测量(PROMs)的进一步标准化。此外,研究还探讨了不同报告类型的结果可能存在的差异。研究方法收集了 567 名完成 CLEFT-Q 问卷量表的 CL/P 患者及其护理人员的数据。研究了 8 岁、12 岁和 15 岁时的报告者群体规模和比例,以确定首选的完成方式。分析了 3 个年龄段每个量表的平均结果,并对 3 个报告者群体进行了比较:"患者"、"护理人员 "和 "一起"。结果:在所有年龄组中,大多数人都是一起完成 PROM 的。就每个年龄组的报告者类型而言,单独完成量表的患者比例呈上升趋势。而在护理人员组中,则出现了下降趋势,8 岁时完成量表的家长比例最高。在所有量表中,报告人类型之间均未发现明显差异。结论即使 PROM 问卷仅针对患者报告进行了验证,也建议在填写儿科 PROM 时记录报告者类型。为了在护理人员的支持下有效、可靠地获取代表患者心声的结果,儿科 PROM 应由患者单独填写,然后与护理人员一起进行评估。关于 CLEFT-Q,似乎需要一个经过验证的家长版量表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Utility of 3D-printed Cutting Guides in Genioglossus Advancement Anterior Versus Lateral Skull Base Fractures: Differences in Hospital Course and Need for Surgery A Rare Case of Massive Juvenile Ossifying Fibroma Requiring Total Maxillectomy and Craniofacial Reconstruction Anatomy, Diagnosis, and Clinical Management of Deep Neck Space Infections Reflections on Operating in War-Time Ukraine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1