A Scoping Review of Adjuvant Perioperative Therapies for Primary Cleft Lip Repair

FACE Pub Date : 2023-11-25 DOI:10.1177/27325016231212564
Melinda Lem, Jason T Pham, Jagmeet Arora, Shivang Trivedi, Omotayo A. Arowojolu, Ruben Castro, Joseph Mocharnuk, Raj Vyas, Miles J. Pfaff
{"title":"A Scoping Review of Adjuvant Perioperative Therapies for Primary Cleft Lip Repair","authors":"Melinda Lem, Jason T Pham, Jagmeet Arora, Shivang Trivedi, Omotayo A. Arowojolu, Ruben Castro, Joseph Mocharnuk, Raj Vyas, Miles J. Pfaff","doi":"10.1177/27325016231212564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background:To date, there is little guidance regarding current adjuvant therapies for primary surgical repair of cleft lip. There are studies on the effect of botulinum toxin type A, revision fat grafting, silicone gel and sheeting, intense pulsed light, and carbon dioxide lasers to ameliorate contracture and hypertrophic scar formation, but a comprehensive review of these options is lacking. The aim of this scoping review is to examine adjuvant techniques and therapies that modulate scar outcomes for primary cleft lip repair outcomes in the perioperative period. Methods: PROSPERO, PubMed/MEDLINE, SCOPUS, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrial.gov were searched for studies that evaluated adjuvant therapies for primary cleft lip repair. Results: The initial search resulted in 688 studies, with 48 studies including relevant key terms in the title and abstract screening. After the full-text screening, 11 studies were included in the final scoping review. These included 3 studies about use of botulinum toxin injection, 2 studies about fat grafting, 2 studies about nasal stents, and 4 studies about various topical treatments. In the Jadad quality index evaluation and MINORS assessment of the methodological quality of the included papers, there was a strong level of agreement among the 2 raters respectively (weighted κ = 1, κ = 0.817, both P-value < .0001). Conclusion: From this scoping review, adjuvant therapies such as utilizing botulinum toxin and immediate fat grafting intraoperatively and nasal stents and topical treatments including antibiotic ointment, lidocaine, hydrogen peroxide, and silicone gels postoperatively are worthwhile to consider as a combination of adjuvant treatments to prevent adverse scar formation in patients undergoing primary cleft lip repair. The most robust evidence lies with botulinum toxin use.","PeriodicalId":508736,"journal":{"name":"FACE","volume":"79 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FACE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/27325016231212564","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:To date, there is little guidance regarding current adjuvant therapies for primary surgical repair of cleft lip. There are studies on the effect of botulinum toxin type A, revision fat grafting, silicone gel and sheeting, intense pulsed light, and carbon dioxide lasers to ameliorate contracture and hypertrophic scar formation, but a comprehensive review of these options is lacking. The aim of this scoping review is to examine adjuvant techniques and therapies that modulate scar outcomes for primary cleft lip repair outcomes in the perioperative period. Methods: PROSPERO, PubMed/MEDLINE, SCOPUS, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrial.gov were searched for studies that evaluated adjuvant therapies for primary cleft lip repair. Results: The initial search resulted in 688 studies, with 48 studies including relevant key terms in the title and abstract screening. After the full-text screening, 11 studies were included in the final scoping review. These included 3 studies about use of botulinum toxin injection, 2 studies about fat grafting, 2 studies about nasal stents, and 4 studies about various topical treatments. In the Jadad quality index evaluation and MINORS assessment of the methodological quality of the included papers, there was a strong level of agreement among the 2 raters respectively (weighted κ = 1, κ = 0.817, both P-value < .0001). Conclusion: From this scoping review, adjuvant therapies such as utilizing botulinum toxin and immediate fat grafting intraoperatively and nasal stents and topical treatments including antibiotic ointment, lidocaine, hydrogen peroxide, and silicone gels postoperatively are worthwhile to consider as a combination of adjuvant treatments to prevent adverse scar formation in patients undergoing primary cleft lip repair. The most robust evidence lies with botulinum toxin use.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
原发性唇裂修复术围手术期辅助疗法的范围界定综述
背景:迄今为止,关于目前唇裂初次手术修复的辅助疗法,几乎没有任何指导性意见。有研究表明,A 型肉毒毒素、翻修脂肪移植、硅凝胶和薄片、强脉冲光和二氧化碳激光对改善挛缩和增生性瘢痕的形成有一定效果,但缺乏对这些方案的全面综述。本范围综述旨在研究在围手术期调节原发性唇裂修复术瘢痕结果的辅助技术和疗法。方法:检索了 PROSPERO、PubMed/MEDLINE、SCOPUS、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials、Web of Science 和 ClinicalTrial.gov,以查找评估唇裂初次修复术辅助疗法的研究。结果:初步检索结果为 688 项研究,其中 48 项研究在标题和摘要筛选中包含了相关关键词。经过全文筛选,11 项研究被纳入最终的范围界定综述。其中包括 3 项关于使用肉毒杆菌毒素注射的研究、2 项关于脂肪移植的研究、2 项关于鼻腔支架的研究以及 4 项关于各种局部治疗的研究。在 Jadad 质量指数评估和 MINORS 方法学质量评估中,两位评估者的意见高度一致(加权 κ = 1,κ = 0.817,P 值均小于 0.0001)。结论从本次范围审查来看,术中使用肉毒杆菌毒素和即刻脂肪移植,术后使用鼻支架和局部治疗(包括抗生素软膏、利多卡因、过氧化氢和硅凝胶)等辅助疗法值得考虑作为辅助疗法的组合,以防止接受初次唇裂修复术的患者出现不良疤痕形成。最有力的证据是使用肉毒杆菌毒素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Utility of 3D-printed Cutting Guides in Genioglossus Advancement Anterior Versus Lateral Skull Base Fractures: Differences in Hospital Course and Need for Surgery A Rare Case of Massive Juvenile Ossifying Fibroma Requiring Total Maxillectomy and Craniofacial Reconstruction Anatomy, Diagnosis, and Clinical Management of Deep Neck Space Infections Reflections on Operating in War-Time Ukraine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1