Composite sustainability index for online and distance education

Siti Haslina Md Harizan, Syed Afzal Moshadi Shah
{"title":"Composite sustainability index for online and distance education","authors":"Siti Haslina Md Harizan, Syed Afzal Moshadi Shah","doi":"10.53894/ijirss.v6i4.2387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The surge in internet usage and the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic have emphasized the significance of online and distance education. However, there is a scarcity of scholarly research on the sustainability of initiatives implemented through these modalities, and the existing measurement methodologies for sustainability are not well suited to this particular context. This study aims to elucidate the relationship between sustainability and the performance of online and distance education and proposes a composite sustainability index to assess these programmes. The methodology for constructing this index follows the stages outlined by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and employs both qualitative and quantitative approaches. The qualitative techniques involve interviews conducted with a group of field experts in order to ascertain the prioritization of indicators. Data from these interviews is used to identify key indicators for further prioritization. The application of quantitative analysis involves the characterization of participants and the execution of calculations for finalizing, weighting, normalizing, and aggregating indicators, resulting in the creation of the composite sustainability index. This mixed-method approach is consistently applied throughout the index development process. The study yields a comprehensive sustainability index that assesses online and remote education programmes. It identifies 15 sustainability criteria corresponding to key sustainability dimensions and quality deployment pillars. The practical implications of these indices hold great significance, as they can provide valuable guidance to strategic decision-makers in enhancing current offers and shaping future policies and resource allocations for programmes delivered through online and distance education methods.","PeriodicalId":503776,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53894/ijirss.v6i4.2387","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The surge in internet usage and the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic have emphasized the significance of online and distance education. However, there is a scarcity of scholarly research on the sustainability of initiatives implemented through these modalities, and the existing measurement methodologies for sustainability are not well suited to this particular context. This study aims to elucidate the relationship between sustainability and the performance of online and distance education and proposes a composite sustainability index to assess these programmes. The methodology for constructing this index follows the stages outlined by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and employs both qualitative and quantitative approaches. The qualitative techniques involve interviews conducted with a group of field experts in order to ascertain the prioritization of indicators. Data from these interviews is used to identify key indicators for further prioritization. The application of quantitative analysis involves the characterization of participants and the execution of calculations for finalizing, weighting, normalizing, and aggregating indicators, resulting in the creation of the composite sustainability index. This mixed-method approach is consistently applied throughout the index development process. The study yields a comprehensive sustainability index that assesses online and remote education programmes. It identifies 15 sustainability criteria corresponding to key sustainability dimensions and quality deployment pillars. The practical implications of these indices hold great significance, as they can provide valuable guidance to strategic decision-makers in enhancing current offers and shaping future policies and resource allocations for programmes delivered through online and distance education methods.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在线和远程教育的可持续性综合指数
互联网使用率的激增以及 COVID-19 大流行病的影响都强调了在线教育和远程教育的重 要性。然而,关于通过这些模式实施的举措的可持续性的学术研究却很少,现有的可持续性衡量方法也不太适合这种特殊情况。本研究旨在阐明可持续发展与在线教育和远程教育绩效之间的关系,并提出了评估这些计划的可持续发展综合指数。构建该指数的方法遵循了经济合作与发展组织(OECD)概述的阶段,并采用了定性和定量方法。定性方法包括与一组实地专家进行访谈,以确定指标的优先次序。从这些访谈中获得的数据用于确定关键指标,以便进一步确定优先次序。定量分析的应用包括对参与者进行特征描述,并对指标进行最终确定、加权、归一化和汇总计算,最终创建可持续发展综合指数。在整个指数开发过程中,始终采用这种混合方法。这项研究得出了评估在线和远程教育计划的综合可持续性指数。它确定了与主要可持续性维度和质量部署支柱相对应的 15 项可持续性标准。这些指数具有重要的实际意义,因为它们可以为战略决策者提供宝贵的指导,帮助他们改善目前通过在线和远程教育方法提供的课程,并制定未来的政策和资源分配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Investigation of natural ventilation using a solar chimney in various solar cases Homeschool internship program for students’ interpersonal communication development: A descriptive study A study to assess the readiness of rice farmers to use agricultural technology for production in Nong Khai Province, Thailand Investigation of natural ventilation using a solar chimney in various solar cases Homeschool internship program for students’ interpersonal communication development: A descriptive study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1