Equity, vulnerability and childhood immunization in Kenya and Uganda. A review of policy documents protocol.

Esther Owino, David Mafigiri, Dorcas Kamuya, Caroline Jones, Primus Chi
{"title":"Equity, vulnerability and childhood immunization in Kenya and Uganda. A review of policy documents protocol.","authors":"Esther Owino, David Mafigiri, Dorcas Kamuya, Caroline Jones, Primus Chi","doi":"10.3310/nihropenres.13449.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Inequities in access and uptake of vaccines remains to be a challenge to the full realization of benefits they stand to offer. In the case of childhood immunization, improved full immunization coverage has been witnessed globally in the past decades but countries in sub-Saharan Africa have registered slow progress, with variations between/within countries. This has been attributed to several challenges/vulnerability factors. Consequently, current global efforts to promote access to immunization have focused on the issue of equity, which is now a strategic priority in key international policy documents such as the World Health Organization immunization agenda 2030 among others. It is therefore important to understand the context and efforts being made by individual countries to realize equity. We plan to undertake a systematic policy document review to understand the immunization context in Kenya and Uganda by examining the extent to which equity and vulnerability issues are framed and addressed in key health sector and policy documents in both countries. Methods The systematic review will focus on key health sector and immunization policy documents in Uganda and Kenya between 2000 and 2023. Documents in the English language will be reviewed. Data sources will include official ministry of health websites for each country, websites of key international organizations working on immunization, general google searches and requesting for relevant documents from immunization stakeholders and officials in both countries. Data synthesis will follow a deductive and inductive approach. Findings will be presented in a descriptive format and in line with review objectives. Discussion We will assess the extent to which equity and vulnerability issues are included and how they are defined in the health sector and immunization policy documents. In addition, the review will examine strategies proposed, planned and/or implemented to promote equitable access and uptake of immunization services in the two countries.","PeriodicalId":74312,"journal":{"name":"NIHR open research","volume":"467 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NIHR open research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.13449.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Inequities in access and uptake of vaccines remains to be a challenge to the full realization of benefits they stand to offer. In the case of childhood immunization, improved full immunization coverage has been witnessed globally in the past decades but countries in sub-Saharan Africa have registered slow progress, with variations between/within countries. This has been attributed to several challenges/vulnerability factors. Consequently, current global efforts to promote access to immunization have focused on the issue of equity, which is now a strategic priority in key international policy documents such as the World Health Organization immunization agenda 2030 among others. It is therefore important to understand the context and efforts being made by individual countries to realize equity. We plan to undertake a systematic policy document review to understand the immunization context in Kenya and Uganda by examining the extent to which equity and vulnerability issues are framed and addressed in key health sector and policy documents in both countries. Methods The systematic review will focus on key health sector and immunization policy documents in Uganda and Kenya between 2000 and 2023. Documents in the English language will be reviewed. Data sources will include official ministry of health websites for each country, websites of key international organizations working on immunization, general google searches and requesting for relevant documents from immunization stakeholders and officials in both countries. Data synthesis will follow a deductive and inductive approach. Findings will be presented in a descriptive format and in line with review objectives. Discussion We will assess the extent to which equity and vulnerability issues are included and how they are defined in the health sector and immunization policy documents. In addition, the review will examine strategies proposed, planned and/or implemented to promote equitable access and uptake of immunization services in the two countries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肯尼亚和乌干达的公平性、脆弱性和儿童免疫接种。政策文件协议审查。
导言 在疫苗的获取和使用方面存在的不平等仍然是充分实现疫苗效益的一个挑战。就儿童免疫接种而言,过去几十年来,全球范围内的全面免疫接种覆盖率有所提高,但撒哈拉以南非洲国家的进展缓慢,国家之间/国家内部存在差异。这归因于若干挑战/脆弱因素。因此,目前全球为促进获得免疫接种机会所做的努力都集中在公平问题上,这也是世界卫生组织《2030 年免疫接种议程》等重要国际政策文件中的战略重点。因此,了解各国实现公平的背景和努力非常重要。我们计划对政策文件进行系统性审查,以了解肯尼亚和乌干达的免疫背景,具体方法是审查这两个国家的主要卫生部门和政策文件在多大程度上阐述和解决了公平性和脆弱性问题。方法 系统审查的重点是 2000 年至 2023 年乌干达和肯尼亚的主要卫生部门和免疫政策文件。将对英文文件进行审查。数据来源将包括两国卫生部的官方网站、从事免疫工作的主要国际组织的网站、谷歌搜索以及向两国免疫相关方和官员索取相关文件。数据综合将采用演绎和归纳的方法。研究结果将根据审查目标以描述性格式呈现。讨论 我们将评估卫生部门和免疫接种政策文件在多大程度上纳入了公平和脆弱性问题,以及如 何界定这些问题。此外,审查还将研究这两个国家为促进公平获得和接受免疫接种服务而提出、计划和/或实施的战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
improving Pain mAnagement for childreN and young people attendeD by Ambulance (PANDA): protocol for a realist review. Mapping decision-making pathways: Determination of intervention entry points for diagnostic tests in suspected serious infection. Pharmacist-led DE-eSCALation of opioids post-surgical dischargE (DESCALE) - A multi-centre, non-randomised, feasibility study protocol. Pulmonary aspiration during pregnancy or immediately postpartum in the UK: A population-based case-control study. The UK Breast Cancer in Pregnancy (UKBCiP) Study. Incidence, diagnosis, management and short-term outcomes of breast cancer first diagnosed during pregnancy in the United Kingdom: A population-based descriptive study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1