THE INFLUENCE OF IMPLEMENTING PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENTS IN SCIENCE LEARNING ON STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Jufiani Ulfa, Endang Aldilla, F. Mufit, F. Festiyed
{"title":"THE INFLUENCE OF IMPLEMENTING PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENTS IN SCIENCE LEARNING ON STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW","authors":"Jufiani Ulfa, Endang Aldilla, F. Mufit, F. Festiyed","doi":"10.59052/edufisika.v8i3.28677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This literature review aims to investigate how the portfolio assessment used in research influences the learning outcomes of students based on the objectives of the analysis, research design used, level of education, learning topic, and form of an assessment tool. The most significant benefit of portfolio assessment was obtained in applied research/influence/effectiveness, namely 61.54%. Science learning with a research design had the highest frequency in a quasi-experimental design of 42.31%. The level of education was another factor that affected the portfolio assessment of science learning. Portfolio assessment in science learning was more prevalent at the upper secondary education level, with a percentage of 57.69%. The application of portfolio assessment in science learning (integrated science, physics, and biology) revealed that physics subjects attracted more research interest, namely 50%. Based on the research results and discussion presented in this article, it can be concluded that the portfolio assessment of science learning can be used at various levels of education. The novelty of this research is that it synthesizes the existing literature on the impact of implementing portfolio assessment in science learning on learning outcomes. Portfolio assessment in science learning implies that it can arouse students’ interest in the subject, motivate them to engage in active learning, improve students’ mastery of topics, and inform parents of their child’s educational progress. Future research may explore other aspects of portfolio assessment, such as its validity, reliability, and feedback mechanisms.","PeriodicalId":406623,"journal":{"name":"EduFisika: Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika","volume":"583 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EduFisika: Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59052/edufisika.v8i3.28677","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This literature review aims to investigate how the portfolio assessment used in research influences the learning outcomes of students based on the objectives of the analysis, research design used, level of education, learning topic, and form of an assessment tool. The most significant benefit of portfolio assessment was obtained in applied research/influence/effectiveness, namely 61.54%. Science learning with a research design had the highest frequency in a quasi-experimental design of 42.31%. The level of education was another factor that affected the portfolio assessment of science learning. Portfolio assessment in science learning was more prevalent at the upper secondary education level, with a percentage of 57.69%. The application of portfolio assessment in science learning (integrated science, physics, and biology) revealed that physics subjects attracted more research interest, namely 50%. Based on the research results and discussion presented in this article, it can be concluded that the portfolio assessment of science learning can be used at various levels of education. The novelty of this research is that it synthesizes the existing literature on the impact of implementing portfolio assessment in science learning on learning outcomes. Portfolio assessment in science learning implies that it can arouse students’ interest in the subject, motivate them to engage in active learning, improve students’ mastery of topics, and inform parents of their child’s educational progress. Future research may explore other aspects of portfolio assessment, such as its validity, reliability, and feedback mechanisms.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在科学学习中实施组合评估对学生学习成果的影响:系统回顾
本文献综述旨在根据分析目标、所用研究设计、教育水平、学习主题和评估工具的形式,调查研究中使用的作品集评估如何影响学生的学习成果。在应用研究/影响/效果方面,作品集评估的收益最大,占 61.54%。采用研究设计的科学学习中,采用准实验设计的频率最高,占 42.31%。教育水平是影响科学学习组合评估的另一个因素。科学学习中的作品集评估在高中教育阶段更为普遍,比例为 57.69%。在科学学习(综合科学、物理和生物)中应用组合评价的情况显示,物理学科吸引了更多的研究兴趣,占 50%。根据本文的研究结果和讨论,可以得出结论,科学学习的组合评价可以在不同的教育阶段使用。这项研究的新颖之处在于,它综合了现有文献中关于在科学学习中实施组合评价对学习成果的影响的内容。科学学习中的档案袋评价意味着它可以激发学生对学科的兴趣,激励他们积极主动地学习,提高学生对课题的掌握程度,并让家长了解孩子的学习进度。未来的研究可能会探讨作品集评价的其他方面,如其有效性、可靠性和反馈机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A STUDY OF THE MATURITY PROCESS OF RED GUTTY KETAN FOOD INGREDIENTS IN TERMS OF THE TASTE: EXTREMELY LOW FREQUENCY MAGNETIC FIELD RADIATION A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE CHARACTER OF TOLERANCE IN PHYSICS LEARNING THE INFLUENCE OF SELF-EFFICACY AND LEARNING MOTIVATION OF HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS ON THE UNDERSTANDING OF THE CONCEPTS OF WORK AND ENERGY A STUDY OF PROBLEM SOLVING IN PHYSICS LEARNING: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW ANALYSIS OF CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS IN PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING AND INQUIRY LEARNING MODELS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1