Making sense of the definition of public-private partnerships

IF 1.9 Q3 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Built Environment Project and Asset Management Pub Date : 2023-11-24 DOI:10.1108/bepam-01-2023-0009
Yongjian Ke, Zhe Cheng, Jingxiao Zhang, Yong Liu
{"title":"Making sense of the definition of public-private partnerships","authors":"Yongjian Ke, Zhe Cheng, Jingxiao Zhang, Yong Liu","doi":"10.1108/bepam-01-2023-0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeDespite the widespread study and application of public-private partnerships (PPPs) since the 1980s, the field lacks a universally accepted definition that captures the concept's complexity. This study aims to offer a definition and foster a more substantive and comprehensive discourse on PPPs to improve communication and understanding between academics and practitioners from diverse disciplines and legislative backgrounds.Design/methodology/approachGrounded in the family-resemblance concept proposed by German philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein, this study conducts a comprehensive literature review to identify core and non-core elements frequently cited in PPP descriptions. The authors used these findings to develop the PPP sunflower model as a structured framework for defining PPPs.FindingsThe analysis elucidates six core elements consistently present in PPP descriptions: clarity of roles and responsibilities, appropriate risk allocation and sharing, injection of expertise and resources, cooperation and teamwork, a bundle of services, and long-term contracts. Coupled with identified non-core elements, these core components comprise the PPP sunflower model, a structured framework for defining PPPs that accommodates their multi-faceted nature.Originality/valueThe PPP sunflower model distinguishes itself as a unique contribution to the PPP literature. It offers a rigorous theoretical framework that can elucidate the complexity of PPPs for various stakeholders. The model serves as a practical tool for evaluating the authenticity and viability of PPP projects. The study's novelty lies in its adoption of the family-resemblance concept, thereby providing a comprehensive, multi-dimensional framework that enhances the understanding of PPPs across different disciplines and legislative contexts.","PeriodicalId":46426,"journal":{"name":"Built Environment Project and Asset Management","volume":"99 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Built Environment Project and Asset Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/bepam-01-2023-0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeDespite the widespread study and application of public-private partnerships (PPPs) since the 1980s, the field lacks a universally accepted definition that captures the concept's complexity. This study aims to offer a definition and foster a more substantive and comprehensive discourse on PPPs to improve communication and understanding between academics and practitioners from diverse disciplines and legislative backgrounds.Design/methodology/approachGrounded in the family-resemblance concept proposed by German philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein, this study conducts a comprehensive literature review to identify core and non-core elements frequently cited in PPP descriptions. The authors used these findings to develop the PPP sunflower model as a structured framework for defining PPPs.FindingsThe analysis elucidates six core elements consistently present in PPP descriptions: clarity of roles and responsibilities, appropriate risk allocation and sharing, injection of expertise and resources, cooperation and teamwork, a bundle of services, and long-term contracts. Coupled with identified non-core elements, these core components comprise the PPP sunflower model, a structured framework for defining PPPs that accommodates their multi-faceted nature.Originality/valueThe PPP sunflower model distinguishes itself as a unique contribution to the PPP literature. It offers a rigorous theoretical framework that can elucidate the complexity of PPPs for various stakeholders. The model serves as a practical tool for evaluating the authenticity and viability of PPP projects. The study's novelty lies in its adoption of the family-resemblance concept, thereby providing a comprehensive, multi-dimensional framework that enhances the understanding of PPPs across different disciplines and legislative contexts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
理解公私伙伴关系的定义
目的尽管自 20 世纪 80 年代以来,公私合作伙伴关系(PPP)得到了广泛的研究和应用,但该领域仍缺乏一个普遍接受的定义来概括这一概念的复杂性。本研究旨在提供一个定义,并促进对公私合作伙伴关系进行更实质性、更全面的讨论,以增进来自不同学科和立法背景的学者和从业人员之间的沟通和理解。 本研究以德国哲学家路德维希-维特根斯坦(Ludwig Wittgenstein)提出的家族相似概念为基础,进行了全面的文献综述,以确定在公私合作伙伴关系描述中经常引用的核心和非核心要素。作者利用这些研究成果开发了 PPP 向日葵模型,作为定义 PPP 的结构化框架。研究结果分析阐明了 PPP 描述中始终存在的六个核心要素:角色和责任的明确性、适当的风险分配和分担、专业知识和资源的注入、合作和团队精神、捆绑服务以及长期合同。这些核心要素与已确定的非核心要素共同构成了 PPP 向日葵模型,这是一个用于定义 PPP 的结构化框架,可适应 PPP 的多面性。它提供了一个严谨的理论框架,可以为各利益相关方阐明公私伙伴关系的复杂性。该模型是评估 PPP 项目真实性和可行性的实用工具。该研究的新颖之处在于采用了家族相似概念,从而提供了一个全面、多维的框架,增强了不同学科和立法背景下对公私伙伴关系的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
41
期刊最新文献
Application of lean principles for building refurbishment projects in Sri Lanka Unraveling consumer behavioral intentions to adopt solar water heaters in India using UTAUT model Ex ante required rates of return and related factors in Indonesian PPP infrastructure projects Benefits and challenges of implementing green building development in Nigeria Developing a framework for building information modelling (BIM) adoption in New Zealand
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1