ChatGPT Hallucinates Non-existent Citations: Evidence from Economics

Joy Buchanan, Stephen Hill, O. Shapoval
{"title":"ChatGPT Hallucinates Non-existent Citations: Evidence from Economics","authors":"Joy Buchanan, Stephen Hill, O. Shapoval","doi":"10.1177/05694345231218454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, we generate prompts derived from every topic within the Journal of Economic Literature to assess the abilities of both GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 versions of the ChatGPT large language model (LLM) to write about economic concepts. ChatGPT demonstrates considerable competency in offering general summaries but also cites non-existent references. More than 30% of the citations provided by the GPT-3.5 version do not exist and this rate is only slightly reduced for the GPT-4 version. Additionally, our findings suggest that the reliability of the model decreases as the prompts become more specific. We provide quantitative evidence for errors in ChatGPT output to demonstrate the importance of LLM verification. JEL Codes: B4; O33; I2","PeriodicalId":85623,"journal":{"name":"The American economist","volume":"25 13","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American economist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/05694345231218454","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, we generate prompts derived from every topic within the Journal of Economic Literature to assess the abilities of both GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 versions of the ChatGPT large language model (LLM) to write about economic concepts. ChatGPT demonstrates considerable competency in offering general summaries but also cites non-existent references. More than 30% of the citations provided by the GPT-3.5 version do not exist and this rate is only slightly reduced for the GPT-4 version. Additionally, our findings suggest that the reliability of the model decreases as the prompts become more specific. We provide quantitative evidence for errors in ChatGPT output to demonstrate the importance of LLM verification. JEL Codes: B4; O33; I2
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ChatGPT 幻化不存在的引文:来自经济学的证据
在本研究中,我们从《经济文献杂志》的每个主题中生成提示,以评估 GPT-3.5 和 GPT-4 版本的 ChatGPT 大语言模型(LLM)撰写经济概念的能力。ChatGPT 在提供一般性总结方面表现出相当高的能力,但也会引用不存在的参考文献。GPT-3.5 版本提供的参考文献中有 30% 以上不存在,而 GPT-4 版本的这一比例仅略有下降。此外,我们的研究结果表明,随着提示变得越来越具体,模型的可靠性也会降低。我们提供了 ChatGPT 输出错误的量化证据,以证明 LLM 验证的重要性。JEL Codes:B4; O33; I2
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Applying Normative Ethics to Teach Economic Concepts: A Proposal Leveraging Peer Resources to Promote Undergraduate Education and Well-being Book review: For a Dollar and a Dream: State Lotteries in Modern America Learning From a Laureate: Dr. Vernon L. Smith Undergraduate Economics Program Enhancements to Increase Doctoral Program Participation by Under-Represented Students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1