Effective optical zone after corneal lenticule extraction with the CLEAR femtosecond laser application

Q2 Medicine Laser therapy Pub Date : 2023-11-23 DOI:10.4081/ltj.2023.326
Antonio Leccisotti, Stefania V. Fields, G. De Bartolo, Christian Crudale
{"title":"Effective optical zone after corneal lenticule extraction with the CLEAR femtosecond laser application","authors":"Antonio Leccisotti, Stefania V. Fields, G. De Bartolo, Christian Crudale","doi":"10.4081/ltj.2023.326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Laser vision correction of myopia induces an effective optical zone (EOZ) smaller than the programmed optical zone (POZ) by 16 to 26%. We evaluated the EOZ after corneal lenticule extraction for myopia with astigmatism ≤1 diopter (D) with a new femtosecond laser application (CLEAR), compared to POZ in a retrospective, consecutive, comparative case series study. Forty eyes of 40 patients underwent lenticule extraction with the Ziemer CLEAR® application; the control group was composed of 40 eyes of 40 patients receiving myopic femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK); EOZ was calculated on difference tangential maps at 6 months. For lenticule extraction, mean preoperative spherical equivalent (SE) was -6.03±2.48 D; mean POZ was 6.43±0.27 mm; EOZ 5.55±0.45 mm; mean difference between POZ and EOZ was 0.88 ± 0.28 mm (p=0.00); the mean reduction of EOZ compared to POZ was 13.60%±4.75; a positive correlation between preoperative SE and percent reduction of EOZ was found (r=0.63). For LASIK, mean preoperative SE was -5.89±2.14 D; mean POZ was 6.57±0.34 mm; EOZ 5.16±0.53 mm; the mean difference between POZ and EOZ was 1.41±0.35 mm (p=0.00); the mean reduction of EOZ compared to POZ was 21.46%±5.20. The mean difference between EOZ of the 2 procedures was 0.39 mm (p=0.0008). The mean difference between the reduction in optical zone (POZ-EOZ) of the 2 procedures was -0.53 (p=0.00). In conclusion, in myopia with low astigmatism, the CLEAR application for lenticule extraction provided a limited reduction in EOZ, compared with existing platforms. A positive correlation exists between corrected SE and reduction of the EOZ.","PeriodicalId":17981,"journal":{"name":"Laser therapy","volume":"70 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laser therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/ltj.2023.326","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Laser vision correction of myopia induces an effective optical zone (EOZ) smaller than the programmed optical zone (POZ) by 16 to 26%. We evaluated the EOZ after corneal lenticule extraction for myopia with astigmatism ≤1 diopter (D) with a new femtosecond laser application (CLEAR), compared to POZ in a retrospective, consecutive, comparative case series study. Forty eyes of 40 patients underwent lenticule extraction with the Ziemer CLEAR® application; the control group was composed of 40 eyes of 40 patients receiving myopic femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK); EOZ was calculated on difference tangential maps at 6 months. For lenticule extraction, mean preoperative spherical equivalent (SE) was -6.03±2.48 D; mean POZ was 6.43±0.27 mm; EOZ 5.55±0.45 mm; mean difference between POZ and EOZ was 0.88 ± 0.28 mm (p=0.00); the mean reduction of EOZ compared to POZ was 13.60%±4.75; a positive correlation between preoperative SE and percent reduction of EOZ was found (r=0.63). For LASIK, mean preoperative SE was -5.89±2.14 D; mean POZ was 6.57±0.34 mm; EOZ 5.16±0.53 mm; the mean difference between POZ and EOZ was 1.41±0.35 mm (p=0.00); the mean reduction of EOZ compared to POZ was 21.46%±5.20. The mean difference between EOZ of the 2 procedures was 0.39 mm (p=0.0008). The mean difference between the reduction in optical zone (POZ-EOZ) of the 2 procedures was -0.53 (p=0.00). In conclusion, in myopia with low astigmatism, the CLEAR application for lenticule extraction provided a limited reduction in EOZ, compared with existing platforms. A positive correlation exists between corrected SE and reduction of the EOZ.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应用 CLEAR 飞秒激光进行角膜扁平膜摘除术后的有效光学区域
激光矫正近视的有效光学区(EOZ)比程序光学区(POZ)小 16% 到 26%。在一项回顾性、连续性、对比性病例系列研究中,我们评估了使用新型飞秒激光应用(CLEAR)对散光≤1屈光度(D)的近视患者进行角膜透镜摘除术后的有效光学区(EOZ)与程序光学区(POZ)的比较。40名患者的40只眼睛接受了Ziemer CLEAR®应用的皮孔摘除术;对照组由40名患者的40只眼睛组成,他们都接受了近视飞秒激光原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK);EOZ是在6个月时根据切线差图计算出来的。对于皮瓣摘除术,术前平均球面等值(SE)为-6.03±2.48 D;平均POZ为6.43±0.27 mm;EOZ为5.55±0.45 mm;POZ与EOZ的平均差值为0.88±0.28 mm(P=0.00);EOZ与POZ相比的平均减少率为13.60%±4.75;发现术前SE与EOZ的减少率呈正相关(r=0.63)。对于 LASIK,术前 SE 的平均值为 -5.89±2.14 D;POZ 的平均值为 6.57±0.34 mm;EOZ 的平均值为 5.16±0.53 mm;POZ 与 EOZ 之间的平均差异为 1.41±0.35 mm(P=0.00);EOZ 与 POZ 相比的平均减少率为 21.46%±5.20。两种手术的 EOZ 平均差异为 0.39 mm(P=0.0008)。两种手术的光学区缩小(POZ-EOZ)的平均差异为-0.53(P=0.00)。总之,对于低散光的近视患者,与现有平台相比,CLEAR 应用于皮瓣摘除术能有限地减少 EOZ。矫正 SE 与 EOZ 的减少之间存在正相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Laser therapy
Laser therapy Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the effectiveness of two wavelengths of 810 and 980 nm Diode laser with two different beam profiles on tooth discoloration in bleaching: an experimental study Low-intensity laser-assisted antimicrobial photodynamic therapy and intravascular laser irradiation of blood in oncology: systematic review and a brief report Biomechanical changes after keratorefractive lenticule extraction with CLEAR and after femtosecond LASIK, correlated with optical coherence tomography findings Frequency-doubled neodymium yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) laser trabeculoplasty as adjuvant therapy for open-angle glaucomas Pre-prosthetic atraumatic laser-assisted mandibular rehabilitation: Er,Cr:YSGG 2780 nm for alveoloplasty and mucocele removal. A case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1