Differential, Linear, and Meet-in-the-Middle Attacks on the Lightweight Block Cipher RBFK

IF 1.3 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS IET Information Security Pub Date : 2023-11-23 DOI:10.1049/2023/6691726
Sugio Nobuyuki
{"title":"Differential, Linear, and Meet-in-the-Middle Attacks on the Lightweight Block Cipher RBFK","authors":"Sugio Nobuyuki","doi":"10.1049/2023/6691726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Randomized butterfly architecture of fast Fourier transform for key cipher (RBFK) is the lightweight block cipher for Internet of things devices in an edge computing environment. Although the authors claimed that RBFK is secure against differential cryptanalysis, linear cryptanalysis, impossible differential attack, and zero correlation linear cryptanalysis, the details were not explained in the literature. Therefore, we have evaluated the security of RBFK by application of differential cryptanalysis, linear cryptanalysis, and meet-in-the-middle (MITM) attack and have found that RBFK is not secure against these attacks. This paper introduces not only a distinguish attack but also key recovery attacks on full-round RBFK. In the distinguish attack scenario, data for differential cryptanalysis are two, and the time complexity is one for an exclusive-OR operation. In the key recovery attack scenario, the data for linear cryptanalysis are one pair of known plaintext–ciphertext. The time complexity is one operation for a linear sum. Data for an MITM attack are two. The time complexity is 2 48 encryptions; the memory complexity is 2 45 bytes. Because the vulnerabilities are identified in the round function and the key scheduling part, we propose some improvements for RBFK against these attacks.","PeriodicalId":50380,"journal":{"name":"IET Information Security","volume":"130 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IET Information Security","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1049/2023/6691726","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Randomized butterfly architecture of fast Fourier transform for key cipher (RBFK) is the lightweight block cipher for Internet of things devices in an edge computing environment. Although the authors claimed that RBFK is secure against differential cryptanalysis, linear cryptanalysis, impossible differential attack, and zero correlation linear cryptanalysis, the details were not explained in the literature. Therefore, we have evaluated the security of RBFK by application of differential cryptanalysis, linear cryptanalysis, and meet-in-the-middle (MITM) attack and have found that RBFK is not secure against these attacks. This paper introduces not only a distinguish attack but also key recovery attacks on full-round RBFK. In the distinguish attack scenario, data for differential cryptanalysis are two, and the time complexity is one for an exclusive-OR operation. In the key recovery attack scenario, the data for linear cryptanalysis are one pair of known plaintext–ciphertext. The time complexity is one operation for a linear sum. Data for an MITM attack are two. The time complexity is 2 48 encryptions; the memory complexity is 2 45 bytes. Because the vulnerabilities are identified in the round function and the key scheduling part, we propose some improvements for RBFK against these attacks.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对轻量级区块密码 RBFK 的差分、线性和中间人攻击
用于密钥密码的快速傅立叶变换随机蝶形结构(RBFK)是边缘计算环境中用于物联网设备的轻量级块密码。虽然作者声称 RBFK 可安全对抗差分密码分析、线性密码分析、不可能的差分攻击和零相关线性密码分析,但文献中并没有详细说明。因此,我们应用差分密码分析、线性密码分析和中间人攻击(MITM)评估了 RBFK 的安全性,发现 RBFK 对这些攻击并不安全。本文不仅介绍了区分攻击,还介绍了对全轮 RBFK 的密钥恢复攻击。在区分攻击中,用于差分密码分析的数据为两个,对于排他-OR 操作,时间复杂度为一个。在密钥恢复攻击中,线性密码分析的数据是一对已知的明文-密文。线性和的时间复杂度为一个操作。MITM 攻击的数据为两个。时间复杂度为 2 48 次加密;内存复杂度为 2 45 个字节。由于在轮函数和密钥调度部分发现了漏洞,我们提出了一些针对这些攻击的 RBFK 改进方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
IET Information Security
IET Information Security 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
7.10%
发文量
47
审稿时长
8.6 months
期刊介绍: IET Information Security publishes original research papers in the following areas of information security and cryptography. Submitting authors should specify clearly in their covering statement the area into which their paper falls. Scope: Access Control and Database Security Ad-Hoc Network Aspects Anonymity and E-Voting Authentication Block Ciphers and Hash Functions Blockchain, Bitcoin (Technical aspects only) Broadcast Encryption and Traitor Tracing Combinatorial Aspects Covert Channels and Information Flow Critical Infrastructures Cryptanalysis Dependability Digital Rights Management Digital Signature Schemes Digital Steganography Economic Aspects of Information Security Elliptic Curve Cryptography and Number Theory Embedded Systems Aspects Embedded Systems Security and Forensics Financial Cryptography Firewall Security Formal Methods and Security Verification Human Aspects Information Warfare and Survivability Intrusion Detection Java and XML Security Key Distribution Key Management Malware Multi-Party Computation and Threshold Cryptography Peer-to-peer Security PKIs Public-Key and Hybrid Encryption Quantum Cryptography Risks of using Computers Robust Networks Secret Sharing Secure Electronic Commerce Software Obfuscation Stream Ciphers Trust Models Watermarking and Fingerprinting Special Issues. Current Call for Papers: Security on Mobile and IoT devices - https://digital-library.theiet.org/files/IET_IFS_SMID_CFP.pdf
期刊最新文献
Functional Message Authentication Codes With Message and Function Privacy Lattice-Based CP-ABE for Optimal Broadcast Encryption With Polynomial-Depth Circuits Full-Accessible Multiparty Searchable Encryption Scheme for Shared Cloud Storage A Trust Based Anomaly Detection Scheme Using a Hybrid Deep Learning Model for IoT Routing Attacks Mitigation A Comprehensive Investigation of Anomaly Detection Methods in Deep Learning and Machine Learning: 2019–2023
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1