Co-creative teaching practice and active learning: the opportunity of small group teaching in philosophy

Giulia Lorenzi
{"title":"Co-creative teaching practice and active learning: the opportunity of small group teaching in philosophy","authors":"Giulia Lorenzi","doi":"10.31273/jppp.vol3.2023.1481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Co-creative pedagogy practices, where the students occupy a central role in shaping the sessions acting as partners in teaching, have an enormous potential in fostering inclusiveness and equality in the academic setting. Giving the students a voice and a role to play in designing and delivering teaching interventions, indeed, ensures that their unique interests and their needs as learners are taken on board, valued, and acted upon. Yet, it is challenging to implement co-creative practice while also following principles of active learning. Engaging students in deep learning through activities and “doing” tasks usually requires a certain degree of preparation which ends up creating a structure for the sessions that is less flexible than hoped, and more difficult to be permeated by and open to students’ individual needs and interests. In teaching seminars in philosophy, I have found myself juggling the challenge of combining co-creative practice and active learning principles. Considering philosophy more as a practice rather than a discipline, I have always thought to my seminars as the ideal space for my students to exercise philosophical skills whose development, strength and autonomy constitute a core element of the learning expected from a philosophy graduate. For this reason, active learning has always been a pillar of my teaching practice. Yet, I was finding difficult to connect it to a co-creative approach to teaching. In this piece, I am going to explain how establishing an ongoing, honest dialogue with my students has revealed to be the solution to my problem.","PeriodicalId":142586,"journal":{"name":"Journal of PGR Pedagogic Practice","volume":"81 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of PGR Pedagogic Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31273/jppp.vol3.2023.1481","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Co-creative pedagogy practices, where the students occupy a central role in shaping the sessions acting as partners in teaching, have an enormous potential in fostering inclusiveness and equality in the academic setting. Giving the students a voice and a role to play in designing and delivering teaching interventions, indeed, ensures that their unique interests and their needs as learners are taken on board, valued, and acted upon. Yet, it is challenging to implement co-creative practice while also following principles of active learning. Engaging students in deep learning through activities and “doing” tasks usually requires a certain degree of preparation which ends up creating a structure for the sessions that is less flexible than hoped, and more difficult to be permeated by and open to students’ individual needs and interests. In teaching seminars in philosophy, I have found myself juggling the challenge of combining co-creative practice and active learning principles. Considering philosophy more as a practice rather than a discipline, I have always thought to my seminars as the ideal space for my students to exercise philosophical skills whose development, strength and autonomy constitute a core element of the learning expected from a philosophy graduate. For this reason, active learning has always been a pillar of my teaching practice. Yet, I was finding difficult to connect it to a co-creative approach to teaching. In this piece, I am going to explain how establishing an ongoing, honest dialogue with my students has revealed to be the solution to my problem.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
共同创造的教学实践与主动学习:哲学小组教学的机遇
在共同创造教学法的实践中,学生作为教学伙伴在课程设计中发挥着核心作用,在促进学术环境中的包容性和平等性方面有着巨大的潜力。事实上,让学生在设计和实施教学干预中发表意见并发挥作用,可以确保他们作为学习者的独特兴趣和需求得到考虑、重视和落实。然而,既要实施共同创造性实践,又要遵循主动学习的原则,这具有挑战性。让学生通过活动和 "做 "任务进行深度学习,通常需要一定程度的准备工作,这最终会导致课程结构不如预期灵活,也更难渗透和满足学生的个人需求和兴趣。 在哲学研讨会的教学过程中,我发现自己一直在应对将共同创造实践与主动学习原则相结合的挑战。我认为哲学更多的是一种实践,而不是一门学科,因此我一直认为我的研讨课是学生锻炼哲学技能的理想空间,而哲学技能的发展、力量和自主性构成了哲学毕业生应具备的学习能力的核心要素。因此,主动学习一直是我教学实践的支柱。然而,我发现很难将其与共同创造的教学方法联系起来。 在这篇文章中,我将解释如何与学生建立持续、真诚的对话,从而解决我的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Navigating Challenges in Postgraduate Pedagogy: An EDI Consideration to Preparing, Designing, and Delivering Teaching by PGRs From Learning to Teaching: Incorporating Cultural Familiarity to Enhance GTA Support for International Students' Learning Exploring Inclusive Practices in Schools: A Systems Thinking Perspective Creating a third cultural space: What role does intercultural communication play in PGR teaching? Unveiling the Crossroads: Reflections on Teaching Chinese Master’s Students in Chemical Engineering Labs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1