Impact of danger, legibility and mystery on visitor’s preference in fortified landscapes compared with park landscapes in urban areas

Q2 Environmental Science Landscape Online Pub Date : 2023-11-22 DOI:10.3097/lo.2023.1118
Ł. Pardela, Aleksandra Lis, Karolina Zalewska
{"title":"Impact of danger, legibility and mystery on visitor’s preference in fortified landscapes compared with park landscapes in urban areas","authors":"Ł. Pardela, Aleksandra Lis, Karolina Zalewska","doi":"10.3097/lo.2023.1118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Both the parks and historical fortifications constitute important components of urban green spaces in many cities around the world. The approach taken in terms of shaping these spaces often appears similar regardless of provenance. For this reason, recognising the preferences of their visitors is relevant from the perspective of creating and managing spaces that are not only safe, but also interesting. In this study we were interested in how fortress landscapes are perceived compared with typical urban parks in Poland. To this end, we conducted a questionnaire involving 117 participants who evaluated a set of 116 eye-level photographs (58 fortified landscapes and 58 urban parks environments). We analysed a range of correlations and mediation models, testing hypotheses regarding the mediating role of mystery, legibility and danger on preferences towards the two types of studied landscapes. We wished to establish what hidden mechanisms underpin the studied variables as well as their influence on the shaping of the researched landscapes. The results indicate that in the case of fortified landscape, it is important to maintain greenery favoured by the respondents, conducive to diversity and mystery while limiting perceived danger. Legibility can support educational values in the protection and maintenance of fortifications when sites are not devoid of mystery. In the case of park landscapes, legibility should not be improved at the expense of a complete loss of mystery, but should be accompanied by a reduction in perceived danger. In turn, mystery in parks plays an important role because without it, even legible park landscapes cease to be liked by the respondents. In turn, in fortress landscapes, mystery has a strong impact on preference, regardless of its relation to danger and legibility. At the same time, were it not for the fact that legibility reduces sense of danger, legible fortress landscapes would not be liked. Therefore, our findings can support the successful restoration and maintenance of fortress landscapes especially when their function shifts and they need to be managed and maintained in a planned manner in modern green areas.","PeriodicalId":38803,"journal":{"name":"Landscape Online","volume":"83 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Landscape Online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3097/lo.2023.1118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Both the parks and historical fortifications constitute important components of urban green spaces in many cities around the world. The approach taken in terms of shaping these spaces often appears similar regardless of provenance. For this reason, recognising the preferences of their visitors is relevant from the perspective of creating and managing spaces that are not only safe, but also interesting. In this study we were interested in how fortress landscapes are perceived compared with typical urban parks in Poland. To this end, we conducted a questionnaire involving 117 participants who evaluated a set of 116 eye-level photographs (58 fortified landscapes and 58 urban parks environments). We analysed a range of correlations and mediation models, testing hypotheses regarding the mediating role of mystery, legibility and danger on preferences towards the two types of studied landscapes. We wished to establish what hidden mechanisms underpin the studied variables as well as their influence on the shaping of the researched landscapes. The results indicate that in the case of fortified landscape, it is important to maintain greenery favoured by the respondents, conducive to diversity and mystery while limiting perceived danger. Legibility can support educational values in the protection and maintenance of fortifications when sites are not devoid of mystery. In the case of park landscapes, legibility should not be improved at the expense of a complete loss of mystery, but should be accompanied by a reduction in perceived danger. In turn, mystery in parks plays an important role because without it, even legible park landscapes cease to be liked by the respondents. In turn, in fortress landscapes, mystery has a strong impact on preference, regardless of its relation to danger and legibility. At the same time, were it not for the fact that legibility reduces sense of danger, legible fortress landscapes would not be liked. Therefore, our findings can support the successful restoration and maintenance of fortress landscapes especially when their function shifts and they need to be managed and maintained in a planned manner in modern green areas.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与城市地区的公园景观相比,危险性、可辨识性和神秘性对游客偏好强化景观的影响
在世界各地的许多城市中,公园和历史防御工事都是城市绿地的重要组成部分。无论其来源如何,在塑造这些空间方面所采取的方法往往大同小异。因此,从创造和管理不仅安全而且有趣的空间的角度来看,了解游客的喜好是非常重要的。在这项研究中,我们感兴趣的是,与波兰典型的城市公园相比,人们如何看待要塞景观。为此,我们对 117 名参与者进行了问卷调查,他们对一组 116 张平视照片(58 张要塞景观照片和 58 张城市公园环境照片)进行了评估。我们分析了一系列相关性和中介模型,检验了关于神秘性、可读性和危险性对两类研究景观偏好的中介作用的假设。我们希望确定所研究变量的隐藏机制及其对所研究景观的影响。研究结果表明,对于加固景观,重要的是保持受访者喜爱的绿色,这有利于多样性和神秘性,同时限制感知到的危险。在保护和维护防御工事的过程中,如果遗址不缺乏神秘感,那么可辨识性就能支持其教育价值。就公园景观而言,提高可辨识性不应以完全丧失神秘感为代价,而应同时降低可感知的危险性。反过来,公园中的神秘感也起着重要作用,因为如果没有神秘感,即使是清晰可辨的公园景观也不再受到受访者的喜爱。反过来,在要塞景观中,无论其与危险性和可辨识性的关系如何,神秘感都会对人们的喜好产生强烈的影响。同时,如果不是因为可读性降低了危险感,可读的要塞景观也不会受到喜欢。因此,我们的研究结果可以为要塞景观的成功恢复和维护提供支持,尤其是当其功能发生转变,需要在现代绿地中进行有计划的管理和维护时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Landscape Online
Landscape Online Environmental Science-Nature and Landscape Conservation
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Landscape Online focuses on studies dealing with landscape research. The subject matter deals with any scientific, educational or applied aspect of processes, dynamics, indicators, controllers and visions related to landscapes. Furthermore, Landscape Online emphasizes the coupling of societal and natural systems, not only the involvement of human impact on landscape systems but also human perception of the landscape, its values and the evaluation of landscapes. Moreover, articles are appropriate that deal with landscape theory, system approaches and conceptual models of landscape, both their improvement and their discussion. Papers may be undisciplinary or multidisciplinary but have interdisciplinary or transdisciplinary appeal. All kinds of articles or parts of it must not be published beforehand in another journal
期刊最新文献
Landscape understanding and values in extended public consultations on spatial planning in rural communes in Poland Assessing ecosystem services of mountain lakes The Usage and Constraints of Urban River Corridor from a Socio-ecological Perspective: a Systematic Review Applying analytic hierarchy process for site selection of a recreational-educational children complex in Shiraz City, Iran Odyssey of First IALE World Congress in Africa and Opportunities for North-South or South-South Collaboration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1