Navigating in the moral landscape: analysing bias and discrimination in AI through philosophical inquiry

Serap Keles
{"title":"Navigating in the moral landscape: analysing bias and discrimination in AI through philosophical inquiry","authors":"Serap Keles","doi":"10.1007/s43681-023-00377-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article embarks on a philosophical inquiry into the ethical virtues, particularly, kindness, empathy and compassion within the realm of artificial intelligence (AI), seeking to explicate its essence and explore its philosophical foundations. By delving into different philosophical theories of virtues, we can discover how these theories can be applied to the complex terrain of AI. Central challenges are addressed, including issues of bias, discrimination, fairness, transparency and accountability in the pursuit of promoting ethical principles in AI. Moreover, this exploration encompasses a critical examination of universal ethical principles such as beneficence, non-maleficence, and respect for human dignity, specifically in the context of AI. This scrutiny underscores the pressing need for interdisciplinary collaboration between ethicists, technologists, and policymakers to forge robust frameworks that effectively promote values in AI. In pursuit of a comprehensive understanding, it is essential to subject various arguments and perspectives to evaluation. This entails engaging with philosophical theories such as utilitarianism, deontology and virtue ethics. Throughout the article, an extensive array of supporting evidence is employed to bolster the arguments presented by virtue ethics, such as the integration of compelling case studies, empirical research findings, and lived experiences that serve to illustrate and illuminate the practical implications of the discourse. By thoroughly exploring these multifaceted dimensions, this article offers nuanced philosophical insights. Its interdisciplinary approach and rigorous analysis aim to engender a comprehensive understanding of this complex issue, illuminating potential avenues for ethical progress within the realm of AI.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72137,"journal":{"name":"AI and ethics","volume":"5 1","pages":"555 - 565"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AI and ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43681-023-00377-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article embarks on a philosophical inquiry into the ethical virtues, particularly, kindness, empathy and compassion within the realm of artificial intelligence (AI), seeking to explicate its essence and explore its philosophical foundations. By delving into different philosophical theories of virtues, we can discover how these theories can be applied to the complex terrain of AI. Central challenges are addressed, including issues of bias, discrimination, fairness, transparency and accountability in the pursuit of promoting ethical principles in AI. Moreover, this exploration encompasses a critical examination of universal ethical principles such as beneficence, non-maleficence, and respect for human dignity, specifically in the context of AI. This scrutiny underscores the pressing need for interdisciplinary collaboration between ethicists, technologists, and policymakers to forge robust frameworks that effectively promote values in AI. In pursuit of a comprehensive understanding, it is essential to subject various arguments and perspectives to evaluation. This entails engaging with philosophical theories such as utilitarianism, deontology and virtue ethics. Throughout the article, an extensive array of supporting evidence is employed to bolster the arguments presented by virtue ethics, such as the integration of compelling case studies, empirical research findings, and lived experiences that serve to illustrate and illuminate the practical implications of the discourse. By thoroughly exploring these multifaceted dimensions, this article offers nuanced philosophical insights. Its interdisciplinary approach and rigorous analysis aim to engender a comprehensive understanding of this complex issue, illuminating potential avenues for ethical progress within the realm of AI.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在道德景观中航行:通过哲学探究分析人工智能中的偏见和歧视
本文对人工智能领域的伦理美德,特别是善良、同理心和同情心进行了哲学探讨,试图阐明其本质,探索其哲学基础。通过深入研究不同的美德哲学理论,我们可以发现这些理论如何应用于人工智能的复杂领域。解决了核心挑战,包括在追求促进人工智能道德原则方面的偏见、歧视、公平、透明度和问责制问题。此外,这一探索还包括对普遍伦理原则的批判性审查,如仁慈、非恶意和尊重人类尊严,特别是在人工智能的背景下。这种审视强调了伦理学家、技术专家和政策制定者之间跨学科合作的迫切需要,以建立有效促进人工智能价值观的强大框架。为了追求全面的理解,对各种论点和观点进行评估是必不可少的。这需要涉及哲学理论,如功利主义、义务论和美德伦理学。在整篇文章中,广泛的支持证据被用来支持美德伦理学提出的论点,例如整合引人注目的案例研究、实证研究结果和生活经验,这些都有助于说明和阐明话语的实际含义。通过对这些多方面的深入探索,本文提供了细致入微的哲学见解。它的跨学科方法和严谨的分析旨在对这一复杂问题产生全面的理解,为人工智能领域的伦理进步指明潜在的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Algorithms, language, and poetry: a phenomenological perspective Why AI might not gain moral standing: lessons from animal ethics From optimization to inquiry: a Deweyan criterion for machine intelligence Conversational AI agents in education: an umbrella review of current utilization, challenges, and future directions for ethical and responsible use Fostering an enabling environment for health AI innovation and scale: The need for tailored ethics training for innovators in low- and middle-income countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1