AI-produced certainties in health care: current and future challenges

Max Tretter, Tabea Ott, Peter Dabrock
{"title":"AI-produced certainties in health care: current and future challenges","authors":"Max Tretter,&nbsp;Tabea Ott,&nbsp;Peter Dabrock","doi":"10.1007/s43681-023-00374-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Since uncertainty is a major challenge in medicine and bears the risk of causing incorrect diagnoses and harmful treatment, there are many efforts to tackle it. For some time, AI technologies have been increasingly implemented in medicine and used to reduce medical uncertainties. What initially seems desirable, however, poses challenges. We use a multimethod approach that combines philosophical inquiry, conceptual analysis, and ethical considerations to identify key challenges that arise when AI is used for medical certainty purposes. We identify several challenges. Where AI is used to reduce medical uncertainties, it is likely to result in (a) patients being stripped down to their measurable data points, and being made disambiguous. Additionally, the widespread use of AI technologies in health care bears the risk of (b) human physicians being pushed out of the medical decision-making process, and patient participation being more and more limited. Further, the successful use of AI requires extensive and invasive monitoring of patients, which raises (c) questions about surveillance as well as privacy and security issues. We outline these several challenges and show that they are immediate consequences of AI-driven security efforts. If not addressed, they could entail unfavorable consequences. We contend that diminishing medical uncertainties through AI involves a tradeoff. The advantages, including enhanced precision, personalization, and overall improvement in medicine, are accompanied by several novel challenges. This paper addresses them and gives suggestions about how to use AI for certainty purposes without causing harm to patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72137,"journal":{"name":"AI and ethics","volume":"5 1","pages":"497 - 506"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s43681-023-00374-6.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AI and ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43681-023-00374-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since uncertainty is a major challenge in medicine and bears the risk of causing incorrect diagnoses and harmful treatment, there are many efforts to tackle it. For some time, AI technologies have been increasingly implemented in medicine and used to reduce medical uncertainties. What initially seems desirable, however, poses challenges. We use a multimethod approach that combines philosophical inquiry, conceptual analysis, and ethical considerations to identify key challenges that arise when AI is used for medical certainty purposes. We identify several challenges. Where AI is used to reduce medical uncertainties, it is likely to result in (a) patients being stripped down to their measurable data points, and being made disambiguous. Additionally, the widespread use of AI technologies in health care bears the risk of (b) human physicians being pushed out of the medical decision-making process, and patient participation being more and more limited. Further, the successful use of AI requires extensive and invasive monitoring of patients, which raises (c) questions about surveillance as well as privacy and security issues. We outline these several challenges and show that they are immediate consequences of AI-driven security efforts. If not addressed, they could entail unfavorable consequences. We contend that diminishing medical uncertainties through AI involves a tradeoff. The advantages, including enhanced precision, personalization, and overall improvement in medicine, are accompanied by several novel challenges. This paper addresses them and gives suggestions about how to use AI for certainty purposes without causing harm to patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工智能在医疗保健领域产生的确定性:当前和未来的挑战
由于不确定性是医学的一个主要挑战,并有可能导致错误的诊断和有害的治疗,因此有许多努力来解决它。一段时间以来,人工智能技术越来越多地应用于医学,并用于减少医学的不确定性。然而,最初看似可取的做法也带来了挑战。我们采用多方法方法,结合哲学探究、概念分析和伦理考虑,以确定将人工智能用于医疗确定性目的时出现的关键挑战。我们确定了几个挑战。在使用人工智能来减少医疗不确定性的情况下,可能会导致(a)患者被分解为可测量的数据点,并变得明确。此外,人工智能技术在医疗保健领域的广泛应用带来了以下风险:(b)人类医生被排挤出医疗决策过程,患者的参与越来越有限。此外,人工智能的成功使用需要对患者进行广泛和侵入性的监测,这就提出了(c)关于监控以及隐私和安全问题的问题。我们概述了这几个挑战,并表明它们是人工智能驱动的安全努力的直接后果。如果不加以解决,它们可能会带来不利的后果。我们认为,通过人工智能减少医疗不确定性需要权衡。这些优势,包括提高精确性、个性化和医学的整体进步,伴随着一些新的挑战。本文解决了这些问题,并就如何在不伤害患者的情况下将人工智能用于确定目的提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Algorithms, language, and poetry: a phenomenological perspective Why AI might not gain moral standing: lessons from animal ethics From optimization to inquiry: a Deweyan criterion for machine intelligence Conversational AI agents in education: an umbrella review of current utilization, challenges, and future directions for ethical and responsible use Fostering an enabling environment for health AI innovation and scale: The need for tailored ethics training for innovators in low- and middle-income countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1