The Genesis of Jewish Genealogy

IF 0.8 Q3 ETHNIC STUDIES Genealogy Pub Date : 2023-11-21 DOI:10.3390/genealogy7040091
Aaron Demsky
{"title":"The Genesis of Jewish Genealogy","authors":"Aaron Demsky","doi":"10.3390/genealogy7040091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the structure, message, and content of biblical genealogies in light of literary analysis and social anthropology. In particular, the focus is on the so-called “Table of Nations” in Genesis 10. My basic assumption is that most biblical genealogies are a literary genre employing various devices that carry a message using symbolic numbers, chiastic structure, and anticipation. These lists interact and supplement the narrative, sometimes as a foil to the story line. They are inserted at relevant points of change in the story of mankind from Adam and Eve to Joseph and his brothers. I even propose that these insertions are the earliest form of dividing the book of Genesis into installments, a precursor to weekly Torah readings and to the later division into chapters as in the printed text. The underlying message of this chapter is the value concept of the brotherhood of mankind stemming from one father—Noah. This innovative idea of universal kinship breaks with the common pagan view prevalent in antiquity that man’s place is to serve the gods and to have little or no personal identity. Note that the great urban cultures of ancient Egypt and Mesopotamia have left us no real records of family lineage other than the long king lists that reflect dynastic power. No doubt the importance of oral and written lineage stems from a tribal culture like that of the ancient Hebrews and their kindred. This overriding view even shaped the Nimrud pericope, describing his founding the urban centers of Babylon and Assyria. Genealogy became the natural medium expressing this message of universal kinship. Basic to understanding biblical genealogies is discerning two patterns of kinship, one, linear, stretching up to ten generations, and two, segmented genealogies, noting an eponymous “father” and his segmented offspring or wives. Our understanding of these structures in the Bible is shaped by the research of social anthropologists who studied oral genealogy among analphabetic tribes in Africa and the Middle East. I apply these observations and methodology in a detailed commentary on the Table of Nations.","PeriodicalId":73139,"journal":{"name":"Genealogy","volume":"35 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genealogy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/genealogy7040091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ETHNIC STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines the structure, message, and content of biblical genealogies in light of literary analysis and social anthropology. In particular, the focus is on the so-called “Table of Nations” in Genesis 10. My basic assumption is that most biblical genealogies are a literary genre employing various devices that carry a message using symbolic numbers, chiastic structure, and anticipation. These lists interact and supplement the narrative, sometimes as a foil to the story line. They are inserted at relevant points of change in the story of mankind from Adam and Eve to Joseph and his brothers. I even propose that these insertions are the earliest form of dividing the book of Genesis into installments, a precursor to weekly Torah readings and to the later division into chapters as in the printed text. The underlying message of this chapter is the value concept of the brotherhood of mankind stemming from one father—Noah. This innovative idea of universal kinship breaks with the common pagan view prevalent in antiquity that man’s place is to serve the gods and to have little or no personal identity. Note that the great urban cultures of ancient Egypt and Mesopotamia have left us no real records of family lineage other than the long king lists that reflect dynastic power. No doubt the importance of oral and written lineage stems from a tribal culture like that of the ancient Hebrews and their kindred. This overriding view even shaped the Nimrud pericope, describing his founding the urban centers of Babylon and Assyria. Genealogy became the natural medium expressing this message of universal kinship. Basic to understanding biblical genealogies is discerning two patterns of kinship, one, linear, stretching up to ten generations, and two, segmented genealogies, noting an eponymous “father” and his segmented offspring or wives. Our understanding of these structures in the Bible is shaped by the research of social anthropologists who studied oral genealogy among analphabetic tribes in Africa and the Middle East. I apply these observations and methodology in a detailed commentary on the Table of Nations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
犹太族谱的起源
本文从文学分析和社会人类学的角度探讨了圣经家谱的结构、信息和内容。尤其是《创世纪》第 10 章中所谓的 "万国表"。我的基本假设是,《圣经》中的大多数家谱都是一种文学体裁,采用了各种手段,利用象征性的数字、楔形结构和预期来传递信息。这些清单与叙事相互影响、相互补充,有时甚至是故事主线的陪衬。从亚当和夏娃到约瑟和他的兄弟,它们被插入人类故事的相关变化点。我甚至认为,插入这些列表是将《创世记》分成几部分的最早形式,是每周诵读《托拉》的先驱,也是后来印刷文本中将《创世记》分成章节的先驱。这一章的基本信息是人类兄弟情谊的价值理念,这种情谊源自同一个父亲--挪亚。这种普世亲情的创新理念打破了古代流行的异教观点,即人的地位是侍奉神灵,几乎没有个人身份。请注意,古埃及和美索不达米亚的伟大城市文化除了反映王朝权力的长长的国王名单之外,没有给我们留下任何关于家族世系的真实记录。毫无疑问,口头和书面世系的重要性源于像古希伯来人及其同族那样的部落文化。这种压倒一切的观点甚至影响了《尼姆鲁德》的经文,描述了他建立巴比伦和亚述城市中心的过程。家谱成为表达这种普遍亲缘关系信息的自然媒介。理解《圣经》家谱的基本要素是辨别两种亲属关系模式,一种是线性的,长达十代;另一种是分段的家谱,指出一个同名的 "父亲 "及其分段的后代或妻子。我们对《圣经》中这些结构的理解是由社会人类学家的研究形成的,他们研究了非洲和中东猿人部落的口头家谱。我将这些观察和方法应用于对《万国表》的详细注释中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
MALAMA: Cultivating Food Sovereignty through Backyard Aquaponics with Native Hawaiian Families. Evolution of Armenian Surname Distribution in France between 1891 and 1990 Searching for Jewish Ancestors before They Had a Fixed Family Name—Three Case Studies from Bohemia, Southern Germany, and Prague Social Progress and the Dravidian “Race” in Tamil Social Thought Unraveling Gender Dynamics in Migration and Remittances: An Empirical Analysis of Asian Women’s “Exposure to Migration”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1