Response of Tiger Salamanders (Ambystoma t. tigrinum) to Wetland Restoration in a Midwestern Agricultural Landscape, U.S.A.

P. Bartelt, Alyse T. DeVries, Robert W. Klaver
{"title":"Response of Tiger Salamanders (Ambystoma t. tigrinum) to Wetland Restoration in a Midwestern Agricultural Landscape, U.S.A.","authors":"P. Bartelt, Alyse T. DeVries, Robert W. Klaver","doi":"10.1643/h2020083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the early 1990s, > 3,000 ha of wetlands (and adjacent prairie) have been restored on the row-crop agricultural landscape of Winnebago County, Iowa, U.S.A. From 2014–2016, we surveyed 45 wetlands among 19 easements for occupancy by Eastern Tiger Salamanders (Ambystoma tigrinum tigrinum) and used radio-telemetry to measure their patterns of movement and habitat use. Rates of occupancy increased with wetland age, from < 25% for wetlands 1–2 years old to ∼75% for wetlands > 11 years old. A two-year survey (2014 and 2015) of ten wetlands restored in 2013 showed that nine were occupied after two years; we did not find a relationship between distance to the nearest salamander population and occupancy of newly restored wetlands by salamanders. We tracked 30 salamanders after they left their breeding wetlands for an average of 69±37 d (range = 14–109 d) and relocated them a total of 393 times. Typically, once a salamander left its breeding wetland, it traveled 50–350 m over several days, found a suitable burrow, then remained for much of the rest of the season. Mean daily distances traveled by salamanders were 7.9±5.6 m (range = 0–135 m); the range of maximum straight-line distances moved was 26–659 m; only one individual salamander traveled in a statistically linear path, relative to a random walk. While ∼90% of the landscape was composed of row-crop fields, salamanders used protective grassy habitats (e.g., restored prairie, road ditches) on ∼88% of our observations. Only three salamanders used row-crop fields, and two of them were killed by heavy equipment. Regardless of the terrestrial habitat types used by salamanders, we found them underground on 336 (84.8%) of our observations.","PeriodicalId":507721,"journal":{"name":"Ichthyology & Herpetology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ichthyology & Herpetology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1643/h2020083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since the early 1990s, > 3,000 ha of wetlands (and adjacent prairie) have been restored on the row-crop agricultural landscape of Winnebago County, Iowa, U.S.A. From 2014–2016, we surveyed 45 wetlands among 19 easements for occupancy by Eastern Tiger Salamanders (Ambystoma tigrinum tigrinum) and used radio-telemetry to measure their patterns of movement and habitat use. Rates of occupancy increased with wetland age, from < 25% for wetlands 1–2 years old to ∼75% for wetlands > 11 years old. A two-year survey (2014 and 2015) of ten wetlands restored in 2013 showed that nine were occupied after two years; we did not find a relationship between distance to the nearest salamander population and occupancy of newly restored wetlands by salamanders. We tracked 30 salamanders after they left their breeding wetlands for an average of 69±37 d (range = 14–109 d) and relocated them a total of 393 times. Typically, once a salamander left its breeding wetland, it traveled 50–350 m over several days, found a suitable burrow, then remained for much of the rest of the season. Mean daily distances traveled by salamanders were 7.9±5.6 m (range = 0–135 m); the range of maximum straight-line distances moved was 26–659 m; only one individual salamander traveled in a statistically linear path, relative to a random walk. While ∼90% of the landscape was composed of row-crop fields, salamanders used protective grassy habitats (e.g., restored prairie, road ditches) on ∼88% of our observations. Only three salamanders used row-crop fields, and two of them were killed by heavy equipment. Regardless of the terrestrial habitat types used by salamanders, we found them underground on 336 (84.8%) of our observations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国中西部农业景观中虎纹蝾螈(Ambystoma t. tigrinum)对湿地恢复的反应
自 20 世纪 90 年代初以来,美国爱荷华州温尼贝戈县的连作农业区已恢复了超过 3,000 公顷的湿地(及邻近草原)。从 2014 年到 2016 年,我们调查了 19 块地役权中 45 块湿地的东部虎蝾螈(Ambystoma tigrinum tigrinum)占用情况,并使用无线电遥测技术测量它们的移动和栖息地使用模式。占用率随着湿地年龄的增长而增加,从1-2年湿地的<25%到>11年湿地的∼75%。我们对2013年恢复的10块湿地进行了为期两年(2014年和2015年)的调查,结果显示,其中9块湿地在两年后被占用;我们没有发现与最近的大鲵种群的距离与大鲵对新恢复湿地的占用率之间存在关系。我们对离开繁殖湿地后的 30 只大鲵进行了平均 69±37 d(范围 = 14-109 d)的跟踪,并对它们进行了 393 次重新定位。通常情况下,蝾螈离开繁殖湿地后,会在数天内行进50-350 m,找到合适的洞穴,然后在整个季节的大部分时间里都留在那里。蝾螈的日平均移动距离为7.9±5.6米(范围=0-135米);最大直线移动距离范围为26-659米;相对于随机行走,只有一只蝾螈以统计的直线路径行走。虽然90%的地形由行作田构成,但88%的观察结果显示,蝾螈使用了保护性草地栖息地(如恢复的草原、道路沟渠)。只有三只蝾螈使用过农田,其中两只被重型设备杀死。无论蝾螈使用哪种陆生栖息地类型,我们在336次观测(84.8%)中发现它们在地下活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Jennifer Moore Investigating Ex Situ Competitive Interactions in a Novel Fish Community with Implications for the Introduction of Sunfish (Lepomis spp.) in Headwater Streams Rapid Ossification Helps Explain Small Body Size in Urspelerpes brucei (Caudata: Plethodontidae) Image Processing of Thigh Color Pattern Is an Effective Method for Identifying Individual Cope's Gray Treefrogs, Hyla chrysoscelis Sexual Dimorphism in the Electric Knifefish Sternarchogiton labiatus (Gymnotiformes: Apteronotidae) with a Hypermorphic Snout and Oral Jaws
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1