Toward coherent space–time mapping of seagrass cover from satellite data: an example of a Mediterranean lagoon

Guillaume Goodwin, M. Marani, S. Silvestri, L. Carniello, A. D’Alpaos
{"title":"Toward coherent space–time mapping of seagrass cover from satellite data: an example of a Mediterranean lagoon","authors":"Guillaume Goodwin, M. Marani, S. Silvestri, L. Carniello, A. D’Alpaos","doi":"10.5194/bg-20-4551-2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Seagrass meadows are a highly productive and economically important shallow coastal habitat. Their sensitivity to natural and anthropogenic disturbances, combined with their importance for local biodiversity, carbon stocks, and sediment dynamics, motivate a frequent monitoring of their distribution. However, generating time series of seagrass cover from field observations is costly, and mapping methods based on remote sensing require restrictive conditions on seabed visibility, limiting the frequency of observations. In this contribution, we examine the effect of accounting for environmental factors, such as the bathymetry and median grain size (D50) of the substrate as well as the coordinates of known seagrass patches, on the performance of a random forest (RF) classifier used to determine seagrass cover. Using 148 Landsat images of the Venice Lagoon (Italy) between 1999 and 2020, we trained an RF classifier with only spectral features from Landsat images and seagrass surveys from 2002 and 2017. Then, by adding the features above and applying a time-based correction to predictions, we created multiple RF models with different feature combinations. We tested the quality of the resulting seagrass cover predictions from each model against field surveys, showing that bathymetry, D50, and coordinates of known patches exert an influence that is dependent on the training Landsat image and seagrass survey chosen. In models trained on a survey from 2017, where using only spectral features causes predictions to overestimate seagrass surface area, no significant change in model performance was observed. Conversely, in models trained on a survey from 2002, the addition of the out-of-image features and particularly coordinates of known vegetated patches greatly improves the predictive capacity of the model, while still allowing the detection of seagrass beds absent in the reference field survey. Applying a time-based correction eliminates small temporal variations in predictions, improving predictions that performed well before correction. We conclude that accounting for the coordinates of known seagrass patches, together with applying a time-based correction, has the most potential to produce reliable frequent predictions of seagrass cover. While this case study alone is insufficient to explain how geographic location information influences the classification process, we suggest that it is linked to the inherent spatial auto-correlation of seagrass meadow distribution. In the interest of improving remote-sensing classification and particularly to develop our capacity to map vegetation across time, we identify this phenomenon as warranting further research.","PeriodicalId":502171,"journal":{"name":"Biogeosciences","volume":"45 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biogeosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-4551-2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. Seagrass meadows are a highly productive and economically important shallow coastal habitat. Their sensitivity to natural and anthropogenic disturbances, combined with their importance for local biodiversity, carbon stocks, and sediment dynamics, motivate a frequent monitoring of their distribution. However, generating time series of seagrass cover from field observations is costly, and mapping methods based on remote sensing require restrictive conditions on seabed visibility, limiting the frequency of observations. In this contribution, we examine the effect of accounting for environmental factors, such as the bathymetry and median grain size (D50) of the substrate as well as the coordinates of known seagrass patches, on the performance of a random forest (RF) classifier used to determine seagrass cover. Using 148 Landsat images of the Venice Lagoon (Italy) between 1999 and 2020, we trained an RF classifier with only spectral features from Landsat images and seagrass surveys from 2002 and 2017. Then, by adding the features above and applying a time-based correction to predictions, we created multiple RF models with different feature combinations. We tested the quality of the resulting seagrass cover predictions from each model against field surveys, showing that bathymetry, D50, and coordinates of known patches exert an influence that is dependent on the training Landsat image and seagrass survey chosen. In models trained on a survey from 2017, where using only spectral features causes predictions to overestimate seagrass surface area, no significant change in model performance was observed. Conversely, in models trained on a survey from 2002, the addition of the out-of-image features and particularly coordinates of known vegetated patches greatly improves the predictive capacity of the model, while still allowing the detection of seagrass beds absent in the reference field survey. Applying a time-based correction eliminates small temporal variations in predictions, improving predictions that performed well before correction. We conclude that accounting for the coordinates of known seagrass patches, together with applying a time-based correction, has the most potential to produce reliable frequent predictions of seagrass cover. While this case study alone is insufficient to explain how geographic location information influences the classification process, we suggest that it is linked to the inherent spatial auto-correlation of seagrass meadow distribution. In the interest of improving remote-sensing classification and particularly to develop our capacity to map vegetation across time, we identify this phenomenon as warranting further research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用卫星数据绘制一致的海草覆盖时空图:以地中海泻湖为例
摘要海草草甸是一种高产且具有重要经济价值的浅海沿岸生境。海草对自然和人为干扰的敏感性,加上其对当地生物多样性、碳储量和沉积物动力学的重要性,促使人们经常对其分布进行监测。然而,通过实地观测生成海草覆盖的时间序列成本高昂,而基于遥感的绘图方法需要对海底能见度进行限制,从而限制了观测频率。在这篇论文中,我们研究了环境因素(如底质的水深和中值粒径(D50)以及已知海草斑块的坐标)对用于确定海草覆盖率的随机森林(RF)分类器性能的影响。我们使用 1999 年至 2020 年期间威尼斯泻湖(意大利)的 148 幅 Landsat 图像,仅利用 2002 年至 2017 年期间 Landsat 图像和海草调查的光谱特征训练了 RF 分类器。然后,通过添加上述特征并对预测进行基于时间的校正,我们创建了具有不同特征组合的多个射频模型。我们根据实地调查测试了每个模型得出的海草覆盖率预测结果的质量,结果表明,水深、D50 和已知斑块的坐标会产生影响,而这种影响取决于所选择的训练 Landsat 图像和海草调查。在根据 2017 年调查训练的模型中,仅使用光谱特征会导致预测结果高估海草表面积,但并未观察到模型性能的显著变化。相反,在根据 2002 年的勘测结果训练的模型中,增加了图像外特征,特别是已知植被斑块的坐标,大大提高了模型的预测能力,同时仍能检测到参考实地勘测中没有的海草床。基于时间的校正消除了预测中的微小时间变化,改善了校正前表现良好的预测。我们的结论是,考虑已知海草斑块的坐标,同时应用基于时间的校正,最有可能产生可靠的海草覆盖率频繁预测。虽然仅凭这一案例研究不足以解释地理位置信息如何影响分类过程,但我们认为这与海草草甸分布固有的空间自相关性有关。为了改进遥感分类,特别是提高我们绘制跨时间植被图的能力,我们认为这一现象值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The impacts of modelling prescribed vs. dynamic land cover in a high-CO2 future scenario – greening of the Arctic and Amazonian dieback Linking geomorphological processes and wildlife microhabitat selection: nesting birds select refuges generated by permafrost degradation in the Arctic The biological and preformed carbon pumps in perpetually slower and warmer oceans Climate-based prediction of carbon fluxes from deadwood in Australia Composite calcite and opal test in Foraminifera (Rhizaria)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1