U. Achatz, M. J. Alexander, Erich Becker, Hye-Yeong Chun, Andreas Dörnbrack, Laura Holt, R. Plougonven, I. Polichtchouk, Kaoru Sato, Aditi Sheshadri, C. Stephan, A. van Niekerk, C. Wright
{"title":"Atmospheric Gravity Waves: Processes and Parameterization","authors":"U. Achatz, M. J. Alexander, Erich Becker, Hye-Yeong Chun, Andreas Dörnbrack, Laura Holt, R. Plougonven, I. Polichtchouk, Kaoru Sato, Aditi Sheshadri, C. Stephan, A. van Niekerk, C. Wright","doi":"10.1175/jas-d-23-0210.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Atmospheric predictability from sub-seasonal to seasonal time scales and climate variability are both influenced critically by gravity waves (GW). The quality of regional and global numerical models relies on thorough understanding of GW dynamics and its interplay with chemistry, precipitation, clouds and climate across many scales. For the foreseeable future, GWs and many other relevant processes will remain partly unresolved, and models will continue to rely on parameterizations. Recent model inter-comparisons and studies show that present-day GW parameterizations do not accurately represent GW processes. These shortcomings introduce uncertainties, among others, in predicting the effects of climate change on important modes of variability. However, the last decade has produced new data and advances in theoretical and numerical developments that promise to improve the situation. This review gives a survey of these developments, discusses the present status of GW parameterizations and formulates recommendations on how to proceed from there.","PeriodicalId":508177,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences","volume":"9 24","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1175/jas-d-23-0210.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Atmospheric predictability from sub-seasonal to seasonal time scales and climate variability are both influenced critically by gravity waves (GW). The quality of regional and global numerical models relies on thorough understanding of GW dynamics and its interplay with chemistry, precipitation, clouds and climate across many scales. For the foreseeable future, GWs and many other relevant processes will remain partly unresolved, and models will continue to rely on parameterizations. Recent model inter-comparisons and studies show that present-day GW parameterizations do not accurately represent GW processes. These shortcomings introduce uncertainties, among others, in predicting the effects of climate change on important modes of variability. However, the last decade has produced new data and advances in theoretical and numerical developments that promise to improve the situation. This review gives a survey of these developments, discusses the present status of GW parameterizations and formulates recommendations on how to proceed from there.