Performance evaluation of the EUROIMMUN anti-acetylcholine receptor enzyme-linked immunoassay

Q4 Immunology and Microbiology Clinical and Experimental Neuroimmunology Pub Date : 2023-11-20 DOI:10.1111/cen3.12774
Naoki Kawaguchi, Asami Imafuku, Satoshi Fujii, Ji-Hoon Sohn
{"title":"Performance evaluation of the EUROIMMUN anti-acetylcholine receptor enzyme-linked immunoassay","authors":"Naoki Kawaguchi,&nbsp;Asami Imafuku,&nbsp;Satoshi Fujii,&nbsp;Ji-Hoon Sohn","doi":"10.1111/cen3.12774","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Anti-acetylcholine receptor antibodies (AChR Ab) are one of the pathogenic autoantibodies in myasthenia gravis (MG), and they are specifically mentioned in the Japanese clinical guidelines for MG. In the serological diagnosis and measurement of autoantibodies as an adjunct marker for MG, the radioimmunoassay (RIA) method has been conventionally used as the gold standard. However, there have been several worldwide concerns regarding the use of radioisotopes. In this study, we evaluated the performance of the EUROIMMUN AChR Ab enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in comparison with RIA.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>ELISA reproducibility and dilution linearity were analyzed using AChR Ab-positive samples. Sera from 50 patients with suspected MG and 50 healthy donors were used to assess the correlation and qualitative agreement between the two methods.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The ELISA showed good interassay precision and dilution linearity. The correlation coefficient, sensitivity, specificity and overall agreement of the ELISA in comparison with the conventional RIA amounted to 0.87, 98%, 92% and 95% (kappa = 0.895), respectively. Analysis of the discordant results suggested that the ELISA might be more capable of detecting low AChR Ab reactivity in patients with suspected MG.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The AchR Ab ELISA provides a reliable tool for the quantification of AchR Ab, supporting the diagnosis of MG. As a non-isotopic assay with good precision, shorter handling time and high correlation with the conventional RIA, the AChR ELISA could be a useful alternative in the laboratory routine.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10193,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Neuroimmunology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Neuroimmunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cen3.12774","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Immunology and Microbiology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Anti-acetylcholine receptor antibodies (AChR Ab) are one of the pathogenic autoantibodies in myasthenia gravis (MG), and they are specifically mentioned in the Japanese clinical guidelines for MG. In the serological diagnosis and measurement of autoantibodies as an adjunct marker for MG, the radioimmunoassay (RIA) method has been conventionally used as the gold standard. However, there have been several worldwide concerns regarding the use of radioisotopes. In this study, we evaluated the performance of the EUROIMMUN AChR Ab enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in comparison with RIA.

Methods

ELISA reproducibility and dilution linearity were analyzed using AChR Ab-positive samples. Sera from 50 patients with suspected MG and 50 healthy donors were used to assess the correlation and qualitative agreement between the two methods.

Results

The ELISA showed good interassay precision and dilution linearity. The correlation coefficient, sensitivity, specificity and overall agreement of the ELISA in comparison with the conventional RIA amounted to 0.87, 98%, 92% and 95% (kappa = 0.895), respectively. Analysis of the discordant results suggested that the ELISA might be more capable of detecting low AChR Ab reactivity in patients with suspected MG.

Conclusions

The AchR Ab ELISA provides a reliable tool for the quantification of AchR Ab, supporting the diagnosis of MG. As a non-isotopic assay with good precision, shorter handling time and high correlation with the conventional RIA, the AChR ELISA could be a useful alternative in the laboratory routine.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
EUROIMMUN 抗乙酰胆碱受体酶联免疫测定的性能评估
抗乙酰胆碱受体抗体(AChR Ab)是重症肌无力(MG)的致病性自身抗体之一,日本的重症肌无力临床指南中特别提到了这种抗体。在作为 MG 辅助标记物的自身抗体的血清学诊断和测量中,放射免疫测定法(RIA)一直被作为金标准。然而,世界范围内对放射性同位素的使用存在一些担忧。在本研究中,我们评估了 EUROIMMUN AChR Ab 酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)与 RIA 相比的性能。使用 50 名疑似 MG 患者和 50 名健康供体的血清来评估两种方法之间的相关性和定性一致性。与传统的 RIA 相比,ELISA 的相关系数、灵敏度、特异性和总体一致性分别为 0.87、98%、92% 和 95%(kappa = 0.895)。对不一致结果的分析表明,ELISA 可能更能检测出疑似 MG 患者的低 AChR Ab 反应性。作为一种非同位素检测方法,AChR 酶联免疫吸附试验具有良好的精确性、较短的处理时间以及与传统 RIA 的高度相关性,可作为实验室常规检测的有用替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical and Experimental Neuroimmunology
Clinical and Experimental Neuroimmunology Immunology and Microbiology-Immunology and Microbiology (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Longitudinal imaging for monitoring disease activity in late‐onset Rasmussen's encephalitis during multimodal rehabilitation and immune therapy Response to: Eculizumab use throughout pregnancy in two patients with aquaporin‐4‐positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder Th17 pathway‐related immune signatures in the pathobiology of myasthenia gravis: Integrating the roles of regulatory/effector cytokines and transcription factors Successful treatment with plasmapheresis of severe Bickerstaff brainstem encephalitis with high cerebrospinal fluid CXCL‐10 levels after COVID‐19 infection: A case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1