Public firm presence, growth opportunity and investment in fixed intangible assets of private UK firms

IF 3.9 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Applied Accounting Research Pub Date : 2023-11-20 DOI:10.1108/jaar-01-2023-0032
A. Danso, E. Adu‐Ameyaw, A. Boateng, Bolaji Iyiola
{"title":"Public firm presence, growth opportunity and investment in fixed intangible assets of private UK firms","authors":"A. Danso, E. Adu‐Ameyaw, A. Boateng, Bolaji Iyiola","doi":"10.1108/jaar-01-2023-0032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposePrior studies suggest that, in an industry in which several public firms operate (i.e. greater public firm presence), uncertainty about business operations within the industry is reduced due to greater analyst coverage and quality of information disclosure. In this study, the authors examine how UK private firms respond to investment opportunities in fixed intangible assets (FIAs) in an environment characterised by greater public firm presence (PFP).Design/methodology/approachUsing data from 61,278 (1,358) private (public) UK firms operating in ten sectors spanning from 2006 to 2016, the authors conduct this analysis by using panel econometric techniques.FindingsThe authors observe that private firms are more responsive to their FIA investment opportunities when they operate in industries with more PFP. Also, the authors find that firms in industries with better information quality use more debt and have longer debt maturity security but less internal cash flow. Overall, the findings indicate that PFP generates positive externalities for private firms by lessening industry uncertainty and enhancing more efficient FIA investment. The results are robust to endogeneity concerns.Research limitations/implicationsA key limitation of the study is that it focuses on a single country (the UK) and therefore there is a likelihood that the results found are specific to this setting but not others, particularly developing and emerging economies. Thus, future studies could explore these ideas from the viewpoint of multiple countries.Practical implicationsOverall, the study demonstrates the importance of information disclosure in driving investment decisions of firms.Originality/valueWhile this paper builds on the information disclosure and corporate investment literature, it is one of the first attempts, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, to explore how private UK firms respond to investment in FIAs in an environment characterised by greater PFP.","PeriodicalId":46321,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Accounting Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Accounting Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jaar-01-2023-0032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposePrior studies suggest that, in an industry in which several public firms operate (i.e. greater public firm presence), uncertainty about business operations within the industry is reduced due to greater analyst coverage and quality of information disclosure. In this study, the authors examine how UK private firms respond to investment opportunities in fixed intangible assets (FIAs) in an environment characterised by greater public firm presence (PFP).Design/methodology/approachUsing data from 61,278 (1,358) private (public) UK firms operating in ten sectors spanning from 2006 to 2016, the authors conduct this analysis by using panel econometric techniques.FindingsThe authors observe that private firms are more responsive to their FIA investment opportunities when they operate in industries with more PFP. Also, the authors find that firms in industries with better information quality use more debt and have longer debt maturity security but less internal cash flow. Overall, the findings indicate that PFP generates positive externalities for private firms by lessening industry uncertainty and enhancing more efficient FIA investment. The results are robust to endogeneity concerns.Research limitations/implicationsA key limitation of the study is that it focuses on a single country (the UK) and therefore there is a likelihood that the results found are specific to this setting but not others, particularly developing and emerging economies. Thus, future studies could explore these ideas from the viewpoint of multiple countries.Practical implicationsOverall, the study demonstrates the importance of information disclosure in driving investment decisions of firms.Originality/valueWhile this paper builds on the information disclosure and corporate investment literature, it is one of the first attempts, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, to explore how private UK firms respond to investment in FIAs in an environment characterised by greater PFP.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
上市公司的存在、增长机会和英国私营企业的固定无形资产投资
目的先前的研究表明,在一个有多家上市公司运营的行业(即上市公司较多的行业)中,由于分析师的覆盖面更广、信息披露的质量更高,行业内企业运营的不确定性会降低。在本研究中,作者考察了英国私营企业在公众公司存在(PFP)较多的环境中如何应对固定无形资产(FIAs)的投资机会。设计/方法/方法作者利用 2006 年至 2016 年期间在 10 个行业运营的 61 278 家(1 358 家)英国私营(公共)企业的数据,通过面板计量经济学技术进行了分析。研究结果作者观察到,当私营企业在 PFP 较多的行业运营时,它们对 FIA 投资机会的反应更为积极。此外,作者还发现,信息质量更高的行业中的企业使用的债务更多,债务期限更长,但内部现金流更少。总之,研究结果表明,私营部门筹资促进机制通过减少行业不确定性和提高外国投资的效率,为私营企业带来了积极的外部效应。研究的局限性/启示本研究的一个主要局限性是,它只关注了一个国家(英国),因此所发现的结果有可能只适用于这一环境,而不适用于其他环境,尤其是发展中国家和新兴经济体。因此,未来的研究可以从多个国家的视角来探讨这些观点。原创性/价值虽然本文建立在信息披露和企业投资文献的基础上,但据作者所知,这是首次尝试探讨英国私营企业如何在以更大的私营部门投资为特征的环境中对外国投资机构的投资做出反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: The Journal of Applied Accounting Research provides a forum for the publication of high quality manuscripts concerning issues relevant to the practice of accounting in a wide variety of contexts. The journal seeks to promote a research agenda that allows academics and practitioners to work together to provide sustainable outcomes in a practice setting. The journal is keen to encourage academic research articles which develop a forum for the discussion of real, practical problems and provide the expertise to allow solutions to these problems to be formed, while also contributing to our theoretical understanding of such issues.
期刊最新文献
A mixed methods study of influences on perceived budgeting accuracy in UK universities Corporate culture's influence on the transparency of financial reporting in Iran: an in-depth analysis of readability and tone Earnings quality among private firms: evidence from the ELITE context The impact of board gender diversity on firm performance: does critical mass matter? Crowdability: a new configuration of accountability forms in crowdfunding campaigns of non-profit organisations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1