The hypoalgesic effects of wrist extensors training with blood flow restriction in patients with lateral elbow tendinopathy: a study protocol for a cross-over randomized controlled trial

S. Karanasios, G. Gioftsos
{"title":"The hypoalgesic effects of wrist extensors training with blood flow restriction in patients with lateral elbow tendinopathy: a study protocol for a cross-over randomized controlled trial","authors":"S. Karanasios, G. Gioftsos","doi":"10.18203/2349-3259.ijct20233553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Lateral elbow tendinopathy (LET) is a disabling overuse injury with a significant healthcare burden. Despite the fact that exercise interventions are considered the best recommended treatment option of LET, their effectiveness in reducing pain and improving function remains debatable. The aim of our study is to evaluate the immediate effects of a new method of exercise using blood flow restriction (BFR) on pain perception and pain-free grip strength in patients with LET. Methods: This study was designed as a cross-over randomized controlled trial. We will compare an intervention using wrist extensors training with (WET-BFR) to a control intervention using WET-without-BFR in patients with LET. All measurements will be taken by a blinded assessor pre- and post-intervention. Primary outcome measures will be the changes in pressure pain thresholds at the lateral epicondyle, extensor carpi radialis brevis, C4 vertebra and tibialis anterior. Secondary outcome measure will be the changes in pain-free grip strength ratio. Conclusions: New approaches are needed to improve the treatment outcomes in LET. Although BFR training was found more effective in improving function and treatment success than conventional training, the effects on pain intensity were poor. Our hypothesis is that using the best BFR practice guidelines for wrist extensors training might be more effective to reduce pain sensitivity compared with non-BFR training in patients with LET. The trial will provide new research data to inform clinical practice regarding the effects of using BFR training in the current patient group. Trial registration: University of West Attica ethics committee: 9150/01-02-2023, ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05919914","PeriodicalId":13787,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Trials","volume":"66 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Trials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3259.ijct20233553","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Lateral elbow tendinopathy (LET) is a disabling overuse injury with a significant healthcare burden. Despite the fact that exercise interventions are considered the best recommended treatment option of LET, their effectiveness in reducing pain and improving function remains debatable. The aim of our study is to evaluate the immediate effects of a new method of exercise using blood flow restriction (BFR) on pain perception and pain-free grip strength in patients with LET. Methods: This study was designed as a cross-over randomized controlled trial. We will compare an intervention using wrist extensors training with (WET-BFR) to a control intervention using WET-without-BFR in patients with LET. All measurements will be taken by a blinded assessor pre- and post-intervention. Primary outcome measures will be the changes in pressure pain thresholds at the lateral epicondyle, extensor carpi radialis brevis, C4 vertebra and tibialis anterior. Secondary outcome measure will be the changes in pain-free grip strength ratio. Conclusions: New approaches are needed to improve the treatment outcomes in LET. Although BFR training was found more effective in improving function and treatment success than conventional training, the effects on pain intensity were poor. Our hypothesis is that using the best BFR practice guidelines for wrist extensors training might be more effective to reduce pain sensitivity compared with non-BFR training in patients with LET. The trial will provide new research data to inform clinical practice regarding the effects of using BFR training in the current patient group. Trial registration: University of West Attica ethics committee: 9150/01-02-2023, ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05919914
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肘外侧肌腱病患者腕关节伸肌训练与血流限制的镇痛效果:交叉随机对照试验的研究方案
背景:肘外侧肌腱病(LET)是一种致残性的过度劳损,给医疗保健带来沉重负担。尽管运动干预被认为是治疗肘外侧肌腱病的最佳推荐方案,但其在减轻疼痛和改善功能方面的效果仍有待商榷。我们的研究旨在评估一种使用血流限制(BFR)的新锻炼方法对 LET 患者疼痛感和无痛握力的直接影响。研究方法本研究设计为交叉随机对照试验。我们将对 LET 患者进行腕部伸肌训练(WET-BFR)干预与不使用 WET-BFR 的对照干预进行比较。干预前后的所有测量均由盲人评估员进行。主要结果指标是外侧上髁、桡骨外展肌、C4椎体和胫骨前方压力痛阈值的变化。次要结果指标为无痛握力比值的变化。结论:需要新的方法来改善 LET 的治疗效果。虽然与传统训练相比,BFR 训练在改善功能和治疗成功率方面更为有效,但对疼痛强度的影响较差。我们的假设是,与非 BFR 训练相比,使用最佳 BFR 实践指南进行腕部伸肌训练可能会更有效地降低 LET 患者的疼痛敏感度。该试验将为临床实践提供新的研究数据,为在当前患者群体中使用 BFR 训练的效果提供参考。试验注册:西阿提卡大学伦理委员会:9150/01-02-2023, ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT05919914
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The effectiveness of video feedback intervention on mother-infant interactional quality for women with perinatal mental health illnesses: protocol for a pilot randomised control trial Perioperative management of hyperglycemic patients undergoing surgery: an observational cross sectional study in a tertiary care hospital Perception of decentralized clinical trials and home nursing in oncology clinical research: insights from a survey of clinical research professionals across experimental sites A randomized clinical study comparing Trupler skin stapler and Trulon polyamide suture in post-surgical skin closure during orthopaedic and open abdominal surgeries Immediate effects of bandha hasta utthanasana on cerebral hemodynamics in healthy individuals: a protocol for randomized controlled trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1