Content Words and Readability in Students’ Thesis Findings

T. Sinar, T. T. Zein, T. Syarfina, Mahriyuni Mahriyuni, R. Rangkuti
{"title":"Content Words and Readability in Students’ Thesis Findings","authors":"T. Sinar, T. T. Zein, T. Syarfina, Mahriyuni Mahriyuni, R. Rangkuti","doi":"10.5430/jct.v12n6p347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates the content words and readability in bachelor’s thesis findings in the English Literature Program at the University of Sumatera Utara. Qualitative analysis was applied in this study. The data for this study were content words and sentences taken from the data sources of 13 bachelor’s thesis findings. The content words were collected using a lexical density online tool, and the data for readability was collected and analyzed using an online Flesch Reading Ease tool. The results show that the lexical density of the content words ranges from 50.47% – 57.5%. Whilst the readability of the 13 texts range from 19.1 – 61.7. The average score of content word density indicates that the theses’ findings present concise information as represented in scientific writing, and the readability style ranges from \"very difficult to read” to “standard readable”. In conclusion, these findings can be categorized as densely written language and content words, supported by college students' increasingly intricate choice of words and sentences frequently read.","PeriodicalId":198854,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Curriculum and Teaching","volume":"44 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Curriculum and Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v12n6p347","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the content words and readability in bachelor’s thesis findings in the English Literature Program at the University of Sumatera Utara. Qualitative analysis was applied in this study. The data for this study were content words and sentences taken from the data sources of 13 bachelor’s thesis findings. The content words were collected using a lexical density online tool, and the data for readability was collected and analyzed using an online Flesch Reading Ease tool. The results show that the lexical density of the content words ranges from 50.47% – 57.5%. Whilst the readability of the 13 texts range from 19.1 – 61.7. The average score of content word density indicates that the theses’ findings present concise information as represented in scientific writing, and the readability style ranges from "very difficult to read” to “standard readable”. In conclusion, these findings can be categorized as densely written language and content words, supported by college students' increasingly intricate choice of words and sentences frequently read.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学生论文结论中的内容词和可读性
本研究调查了苏门答腊岛大学英语文学专业本科毕业论文中的内容词和可读性。本研究采用了定性分析方法。本研究的数据来源于 13 篇学士学位论文中的内容词和句子。内容词使用词性密度在线工具收集,可读性数据使用在线 Flesch 阅读容易度工具收集和分析。结果显示,内容词的词性密度在 50.47% - 57.5% 之间。13 篇文章的可读性介于 19.1 - 61.7 之间。内容词密度的平均得分表明,论文的研究结果以科学写作的方式呈现了简洁的信息,而可读性则从 "非常难读 "到 "标准可读 "不等。总之,这些研究成果可以归类为语言和内容用词密集的写作,大学生越来越多地选择复杂的词语和句子来频繁阅读,这也是这些研究成果的佐证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Methods of Studying Web Technologies in a Blended Learning Format: Analysis of Models in Education Google’s Digital Tools for Education: A Selection of Tools Development of Students' Artistic Self-Identification: Finding Their Own Style Modern Trends in Teaching Artistic Techniques and Methods: Analysis of Approaches to the Development of Artists Efficiency of Arts Education in the Context of Formation of Intercultural Communication Skills: Case-Study and Statistical Analysis of the Results
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1