The Effects of Blended Learning Using Virtual Reality Simulation in Pediatrics-adolescent Nursing Clinical Practice

Seok-Young Han
{"title":"The Effects of Blended Learning Using Virtual Reality Simulation in Pediatrics-adolescent Nursing Clinical Practice","authors":"Seok-Young Han","doi":"10.5430/jct.v12n6p356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was to compare the effects of blended learning that integrates child-adolescent nursing clinical practice and virtual reality simulation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of blended learning in parallel clinical practice of child-adolescent nursing and virtual reality simulation of child-adolescent nursing by comparison of critical thinking, problem-solving processes, and clinical performance in both education groups before and after the educational intervention. The participants were 48 nursing college students. The experimental group (n=22) exposed a blended learning using virtual reality simulation, combining child-adolescent nursing clinical practice education, while the control group (n=26) received only child-adolescent nursing clinical practice curriculum course. The data collection period was from March 8 to November 26, 2021. The general characteristics of subject’s were analyzed by number, percentage, mean and standard deviation. And clinical practice fused with virtual reality simulation, that is, homogeneity verification of the blended learning education group was analyzed by x2 test and independent t-test. Whether there is a differences between pretest and posttest critical thinking tendency, problem-solving process, and clinical performance ability of the blended learning and the clinical practice education group was analyzed by independent t-test. The pretest & posttest results of each group showed statistically significant improvements in critical thinking, problem-solving processes, and clinical performance. In a comparison of the results of the two groups, the only statistically significant difference was found for critical thinking. Furthermore blended learning, combining a v-sim and a clinical nursing practice, into the nursing curriculum may contribute to the further development of nursing education.","PeriodicalId":198854,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Curriculum and Teaching","volume":"5 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Curriculum and Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v12n6p356","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study was to compare the effects of blended learning that integrates child-adolescent nursing clinical practice and virtual reality simulation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of blended learning in parallel clinical practice of child-adolescent nursing and virtual reality simulation of child-adolescent nursing by comparison of critical thinking, problem-solving processes, and clinical performance in both education groups before and after the educational intervention. The participants were 48 nursing college students. The experimental group (n=22) exposed a blended learning using virtual reality simulation, combining child-adolescent nursing clinical practice education, while the control group (n=26) received only child-adolescent nursing clinical practice curriculum course. The data collection period was from March 8 to November 26, 2021. The general characteristics of subject’s were analyzed by number, percentage, mean and standard deviation. And clinical practice fused with virtual reality simulation, that is, homogeneity verification of the blended learning education group was analyzed by x2 test and independent t-test. Whether there is a differences between pretest and posttest critical thinking tendency, problem-solving process, and clinical performance ability of the blended learning and the clinical practice education group was analyzed by independent t-test. The pretest & posttest results of each group showed statistically significant improvements in critical thinking, problem-solving processes, and clinical performance. In a comparison of the results of the two groups, the only statistically significant difference was found for critical thinking. Furthermore blended learning, combining a v-sim and a clinical nursing practice, into the nursing curriculum may contribute to the further development of nursing education.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在儿科-青少年护理临床实践中使用虚拟现实模拟进行混合式学习的效果
本研究旨在比较儿童青少年护理临床实践与虚拟现实模拟相结合的混合式学习的效果。本研究旨在通过比较两组教育干预前后的批判性思维、问题解决过程和临床表现,评估儿童青少年护理临床实践与儿童青少年护理虚拟现实模拟并行的混合式学习的效果。参与者为 48 名护理专业大学生。实验组(22 人)接受了虚拟现实模拟的混合式学习,结合了儿童青少年护理临床实践教育,而对照组(26 人)只接受了儿童青少年护理临床实践课程。数据收集时间为 2021 年 3 月 8 日至 11 月 26 日。受试者的一般特征按人数、百分比、均数和标准差进行分析。并通过 x2 检验和独立 t 检验分析临床实践与虚拟现实模拟的融合,即混合式学习教育组的同质性验证。混合式学习与临床实践教育组的批判性思维倾向、问题解决过程和临床表现能力的前测与后测是否存在差异,采用独立 t 检验进行分析。各组的前测和后测结果显示,批判性思维、问题解决过程和临床表现能力的提高均有统计学意义。在对两组结果进行比较时,发现只有批判性思维在统计上有显著差异。此外,将虚拟仿真与临床护理实践相结合的混合式学习纳入护理课程,可能有助于护理教育的进一步发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Methods of Studying Web Technologies in a Blended Learning Format: Analysis of Models in Education Google’s Digital Tools for Education: A Selection of Tools Development of Students' Artistic Self-Identification: Finding Their Own Style Modern Trends in Teaching Artistic Techniques and Methods: Analysis of Approaches to the Development of Artists Efficiency of Arts Education in the Context of Formation of Intercultural Communication Skills: Case-Study and Statistical Analysis of the Results
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1