The Pattern of Midface Fractures in Jordan: A Retrospective Review of Medical Records

IF 0.7 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock Pub Date : 2023-11-17 DOI:10.4103/jets.jets_42_23
A. Bataineh, Yousef Khader
{"title":"The Pattern of Midface Fractures in Jordan: A Retrospective Review of Medical Records","authors":"A. Bataineh, Yousef Khader","doi":"10.4103/jets.jets_42_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Midface fracture incidence and trauma patterns vary across countries, due to socioeconomic, environmental, and cultural factors. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the etiology, pattern, and treatment of midface fractures in North of Jordan during 2018–2021. This single-center retrospective study was based on the review of the medical records of patients who had suffered midface fractures and were treated at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at the King Abdullah University Hospital. The dataset for this investigation spanned the 4-year period from January 2018 to December 2021. During the 4-year period, 267 patients presented with 376 different maxillofacial fractures. Of those, 140 patients had 250 midface fractures, with a mean of 1.79 per patient. Their age ranged from 2 to 68 years (mean [standard deviation] = 25.8 [12.0] years). The most frequent injury cause was road traffic accidents (RTA) (n = 72, 51.3%), followed by falls (n = 27, 19.3%). Among midface fractures, the most frequent were orbit fractures (42.4%), followed by zygomatic fractures (31.6%) and maxillary fractures (26%). The majority of fractures (77.9%) were treated through open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), while the remaining (15.7%) required closed reduction and conservative treatment was sufficient in 6.43% of fractures. Midface fractures were more common among males, and primarily occurred in the orbital floor due to the high incidence of RTAs. Maxillary fractures were mostly of the LeFort I Type and ORIF was the most common treatment modality.","PeriodicalId":15692,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock","volume":"4 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jets.jets_42_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Midface fracture incidence and trauma patterns vary across countries, due to socioeconomic, environmental, and cultural factors. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the etiology, pattern, and treatment of midface fractures in North of Jordan during 2018–2021. This single-center retrospective study was based on the review of the medical records of patients who had suffered midface fractures and were treated at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at the King Abdullah University Hospital. The dataset for this investigation spanned the 4-year period from January 2018 to December 2021. During the 4-year period, 267 patients presented with 376 different maxillofacial fractures. Of those, 140 patients had 250 midface fractures, with a mean of 1.79 per patient. Their age ranged from 2 to 68 years (mean [standard deviation] = 25.8 [12.0] years). The most frequent injury cause was road traffic accidents (RTA) (n = 72, 51.3%), followed by falls (n = 27, 19.3%). Among midface fractures, the most frequent were orbit fractures (42.4%), followed by zygomatic fractures (31.6%) and maxillary fractures (26%). The majority of fractures (77.9%) were treated through open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), while the remaining (15.7%) required closed reduction and conservative treatment was sufficient in 6.43% of fractures. Midface fractures were more common among males, and primarily occurred in the orbital floor due to the high incidence of RTAs. Maxillary fractures were mostly of the LeFort I Type and ORIF was the most common treatment modality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
约旦中面部骨折的模式:医疗记录回顾
由于社会经济、环境和文化因素的影响,不同国家的中面部骨折发病率和创伤模式各不相同。本回顾性研究旨在评估 2018-2021 年期间约旦北部中面部骨折的病因、模式和治疗情况。 这项单中心回顾性研究基于对在阿卜杜拉国王大学医院口腔颌面外科接受治疗的中面部骨折患者病历的审查。本次调查的数据集跨越了 2018 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月的 4 年时间。 在这 4 年期间,有 267 名患者出现了 376 种不同的颌面部骨折。其中,140 名患者有 250 处面中部骨折,平均每人 1.79 处。他们的年龄从2岁到68岁不等(平均[标准差]=25.8[12.0]岁)。最常见的受伤原因是道路交通事故(RTA)(72人,占51.3%),其次是跌倒(27人,占19.3%)。在中面部骨折中,最常见的是眼眶骨折(42.4%),其次是颧骨骨折(31.6%)和上颌骨骨折(26%)。大多数骨折(77.9%)采用切开复位内固定术(ORIF)治疗,其余(15.7%)需要闭合复位,6.43%的骨折采用保守治疗即可。 中面部骨折在男性中更为常见,由于 RTA 发生率高,骨折主要发生在眼眶底部。上颌骨骨折多为LeFort I型,ORIF是最常见的治疗方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
52
审稿时长
39 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Case of Pulmonary Edema due to Hydrogen Sulfide Poisoning. Airborne Management of Acute Aortic Syndromes: Emerging Evidence for Antiemetic Use in Prehospital Care. Patterns of Firework-blast Injuries: A Descriptive Case Series. Outcomes of Patients with Aortic Diseases Treated by Antiemetic Drug, Who Were Transported by a Physician-staffed Helicopter in Japan. Rare Malposition of Central Venous Catheter - Repositioned Under Ultrasound Guidance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1