Technological innovation under trade disputes: how does product market competition matter?

IF 5 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS European Journal of Innovation Management Pub Date : 2023-11-17 DOI:10.1108/ejim-04-2023-0318
Shuchuan Hu, Qinghua Xia, Yi Xie
{"title":"Technological innovation under trade disputes: how does product market competition matter?","authors":"Shuchuan Hu, Qinghua Xia, Yi Xie","doi":"10.1108/ejim-04-2023-0318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis study investigates firms' innovation behaviour under environmental change. Therefore, it examines the effect of trade disputes on corporate technological innovation and how product market competition moderates this relationship.Design/methodology/approachThis research tests the hypotheses using the fixed effects model based on panel data of publicly listed enterprises in China from 2007–2020.FindingsThe empirical results validate the positive association between trade disputes and corporate research and development (R&D) intensity as well as the U-shaped relationship between trade disputes and radical innovation. Additionally, the moderating effect of product market competition is verified: a concentrated market with less competition flattens the U-shaped curve of radical innovation induced by trade disputes; as the market becomes more concentrated and less competitive, the U-shaped relationship eventually turns into an inverted U.Originality/valueFirst, this study contributes to the corporate innovation and trade dispute literature by expanding the environmental antecedents of technological innovation and the firm-level consequences of trade disputes. Second, this study enriches the theoretical framework of the environment–innovation link through an integrated perspective of contingency theory and dynamic capabilities view. Third, instead of the traditional linear mindset which had led to contradictory results, this study explores a curvilinear effect in the environment–innovation relationship.","PeriodicalId":51462,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Innovation Management","volume":"16 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Innovation Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ejim-04-2023-0318","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis study investigates firms' innovation behaviour under environmental change. Therefore, it examines the effect of trade disputes on corporate technological innovation and how product market competition moderates this relationship.Design/methodology/approachThis research tests the hypotheses using the fixed effects model based on panel data of publicly listed enterprises in China from 2007–2020.FindingsThe empirical results validate the positive association between trade disputes and corporate research and development (R&D) intensity as well as the U-shaped relationship between trade disputes and radical innovation. Additionally, the moderating effect of product market competition is verified: a concentrated market with less competition flattens the U-shaped curve of radical innovation induced by trade disputes; as the market becomes more concentrated and less competitive, the U-shaped relationship eventually turns into an inverted U.Originality/valueFirst, this study contributes to the corporate innovation and trade dispute literature by expanding the environmental antecedents of technological innovation and the firm-level consequences of trade disputes. Second, this study enriches the theoretical framework of the environment–innovation link through an integrated perspective of contingency theory and dynamic capabilities view. Third, instead of the traditional linear mindset which had led to contradictory results, this study explores a curvilinear effect in the environment–innovation relationship.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
贸易争端下的技术创新:产品市场竞争有多重要?
目的 本研究探讨环境变化下的企业创新行为。研究结果实证结果验证了贸易争端与企业研发(R&D)强度之间的正相关关系,以及贸易争端与激进创新之间的 U 型关系。此外,产品市场竞争的调节作用也得到了验证:集中度高、竞争程度低的市场会使贸易争端引发的激进创新 U 型曲线趋于平缓;随着市场集中度的提高和竞争程度的降低,U 型关系最终会变成倒 U 型。其次,本研究通过权变理论和动态能力观的综合视角,丰富了环境-创新联系的理论框架。第三,本研究摒弃了导致结果矛盾的传统线性思维,探索了环境-创新关系中的曲线效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
17.60%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: The subject of innovation is receiving increased interest both from companies because of their increased awareness of the impact of innovation in determining market success and also from the research community. Academics are increasingly beginning to place innovation as a priority area in their research agenda. This impetus has been partly fuelled by the Economic & Social Research Council (ESRC) who have designated innovation as one of nine research areas in their research initiative schemes.
期刊最新文献
Unveiling the impact of technological innovation and SMEs resilience: the moderating role of firms' social sustainability orientation Involving lead users in firm’s standardization strategy within action groups: evidence from smart robotics “Every idea made life easier:” A critical discourse analysis of creative employee-driven innovation in the Italian healthcare system How the digital environment moderates disruptive technology and digital entrepreneurship relationship in emerging markets Innovating the bank-firm relationship: a spherical fuzzy approach to SME funding
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1