To study the clinical utility of WHO modified and paperless partograph in the management of labour and its outcome

Subha Bansal, K. Mandrelle, Varughese P V
{"title":"To study the clinical utility of WHO modified and paperless partograph in the management of labour and its outcome","authors":"Subha Bansal, K. Mandrelle, Varughese P V","doi":"10.18231/j.ijogr.2023.078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Early detection of abnormal progress of labour and prevention of prolonged labour significantly improves pregnancy outcomes. Partograph is a simple and important tool which can provide a continuous pictorial overview of labour on a single sheet of paper and is essential to monitor labour. (1) To study the progress of labour using WHO modified partograph in terms of alert line and action line and using paperless partograph in terms of alert and action estimated time of delivery and detect any deviation from normal progress of labour. (2) To evaluate the duration of labour, mode of delivery and perinatal outcome in both the groups.It was a prospective observational study which was conducted over a period of 18months on 200 antenatal patients admitted to the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology at Christian Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana. Antenatal patients with singleton term pregnancy with cephalic presentation in active phase of labour were included in the study. The WHO modified partograph was plotted for 100 cases (Group I) and the paperless partograph was recorded for the other group of 100 patients (Group II) and their outcomes were compared. The p value <0.05 was considered to be significant.In our study we noted that the findings were similar in the WHO modified partograph group and the paperless partograph group in terms of duration of labour, progress of labour, mode of delivery and neonatal outcomes with no statistically significant difference between both the groups.Our study concluded that the paperless partograph is as good as the WHO modified partograph in predicting the labour outcomes and identifying labour abnormalities. The paperless partograph does not need graphical representation and therefore can be adopted as an alternative to the WHO modified partograph in busy labour room settings.","PeriodicalId":13288,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijogr.2023.078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Early detection of abnormal progress of labour and prevention of prolonged labour significantly improves pregnancy outcomes. Partograph is a simple and important tool which can provide a continuous pictorial overview of labour on a single sheet of paper and is essential to monitor labour. (1) To study the progress of labour using WHO modified partograph in terms of alert line and action line and using paperless partograph in terms of alert and action estimated time of delivery and detect any deviation from normal progress of labour. (2) To evaluate the duration of labour, mode of delivery and perinatal outcome in both the groups.It was a prospective observational study which was conducted over a period of 18months on 200 antenatal patients admitted to the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology at Christian Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana. Antenatal patients with singleton term pregnancy with cephalic presentation in active phase of labour were included in the study. The WHO modified partograph was plotted for 100 cases (Group I) and the paperless partograph was recorded for the other group of 100 patients (Group II) and their outcomes were compared. The p value <0.05 was considered to be significant.In our study we noted that the findings were similar in the WHO modified partograph group and the paperless partograph group in terms of duration of labour, progress of labour, mode of delivery and neonatal outcomes with no statistically significant difference between both the groups.Our study concluded that the paperless partograph is as good as the WHO modified partograph in predicting the labour outcomes and identifying labour abnormalities. The paperless partograph does not need graphical representation and therefore can be adopted as an alternative to the WHO modified partograph in busy labour room settings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究世界卫生组织改良版无纸产程图在产程管理中的临床实用性及其结果
及早发现异常产程和预防产程延长可显著改善妊娠结局。产程图是一种简单而重要的工具,它能在一张纸上提供连续的产程图像概览,对监测产程至关重要。(1) 使用世卫组织改良的产程图(警戒线和行动线)和无纸产程图(警戒线和行动线)研究分娩的进展情况,并检测任何偏离正常分娩进展的情况。(2) 评估两组产妇的产程、分娩方式和围产期结局。这是一项前瞻性观察研究,为期 18 个月,对象是 200 名在卢迪亚纳基督教医学院和医院妇产科住院的产前患者。研究对象包括单胎足月妊娠、头位呈活跃产程的产前患者。对 100 例患者(I 组)绘制了世界卫生组织改良的产程图,对另一组 100 例患者(II 组)记录了无纸产程图,并对其结果进行了比较。在我们的研究中,我们注意到在产程、产程进展、分娩方式和新生儿结局方面,WHO 改良分层图组和无纸分层图组的结果相似,两组之间没有统计学意义上的显著差异。我们的研究得出结论,无纸产程图在预测产程结果和识别产程异常方面与世卫组织改良产程图一样好。无纸产程图不需要图形表示,因此可在繁忙的产房环境中替代世卫组织改良产程图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The sequence of acrania–exencephaly–anencephaly (AEAS)- An infrequent case report Complications of placenta previa: A retrospective observational study at tertiary care hospital A comparative study between dinoprostone pessary and dinoprostone gel for induction of labor and neonatal outcome Behind the veil of anemia: Assessment of iron, folic acid, and vitamin B12 deficiencies and their association with red cell indices in anemic and non-anemic women Management of iron deficiency anemia in pregnancy in India: A review of current practices and challenges
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1