Effects of the eradication of the rule of male primogeniture on the customary law of succession

IF 0.1 Q4 LAW De Jure Pub Date : 2023-11-15 DOI:10.17159/2225-7160/2023/v56a24
Kgopotso Maunatlala
{"title":"Effects of the eradication of the rule of male primogeniture on the customary law of succession","authors":"Kgopotso Maunatlala","doi":"10.17159/2225-7160/2023/v56a24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article discusses the consequences of the abolition of the rule of male primogeniture by closely and critically discussing the outcome of the Bhe v Magistrate Khayelitsha case. Therefore, exposing the effect of implementing and extending common law solutions as a means of bringing customary law in line with the Constitution to achieve the right of equality. Thus, the author advises that courts and the legislature should have employed a different method rather than one of extending the application of the Intestate Succession Act 81 of 1987, which subsequently led to the promulgation of the Reform of Customary Law of Succession and Regulation of Related Matters Act11 of 2009, to customary law of succession. Summarily, this article cautions against imposing common law solutions, directly or indirectly, on customary law challenges and advises on utilising customary law institutions, mechanisms and/or remedies to bring customary law in line with the Constitution.","PeriodicalId":41915,"journal":{"name":"De Jure","volume":"7 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"De Jure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17159/2225-7160/2023/v56a24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article discusses the consequences of the abolition of the rule of male primogeniture by closely and critically discussing the outcome of the Bhe v Magistrate Khayelitsha case. Therefore, exposing the effect of implementing and extending common law solutions as a means of bringing customary law in line with the Constitution to achieve the right of equality. Thus, the author advises that courts and the legislature should have employed a different method rather than one of extending the application of the Intestate Succession Act 81 of 1987, which subsequently led to the promulgation of the Reform of Customary Law of Succession and Regulation of Related Matters Act11 of 2009, to customary law of succession. Summarily, this article cautions against imposing common law solutions, directly or indirectly, on customary law challenges and advises on utilising customary law institutions, mechanisms and/or remedies to bring customary law in line with the Constitution.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
废除男性长子继承制对继承习惯法的影响
本文通过对 Bhe v Magistrate Khayelitsha 案的结果进行仔细和批判性的讨论,探讨了废除男性长子继承权规则的后果。因此,本文揭示了实施和推广普通法解决方案的效果,将其作为使习惯法符合《宪法》以实现平等权利的一种手段。因此,提交人建议法院和立法机构应采用不同的方法,而不是将 1987 年第 81 号《无遗嘱继承法》的适用范围扩大到继承习惯法,该法随后导致 2009 年《继承习惯法改革及相关事项监管法》11 的颁布。总之,本文告诫人们不要直接或间接地将普通法解决方案强加于习惯法挑战之上,并建议利用习惯法机构、机制和/或补救措施使习惯法与《宪法》保持一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
De Jure
De Jure LAW-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Administrative Legal Protection of Persons Who Report Breaches of European Union Law Statute and Powers of the Audit Office The Ex Proprio Motu Principle in the Application of Coercive Administrative Measures by the Labour Inspection Development of Bulgarian Maritime Law, Maritime Administration and Services Provided at Bulgarian Ports (1879 – 1944) On the Opportunity to Impose a Pecuniary Penalty on the Economic Successor of the Infringer of Fair Competition Rules
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1