Multiple Stigmas and Their Dimensions: The Mediating Role of Self-compassion in Reduced Resilience

Ying Tang, Christopher A. Julian, Kelsey S. Braun, Sharon A. Stinger, Stacey L. Williams
{"title":"Multiple Stigmas and Their Dimensions: The Mediating Role of Self-compassion in Reduced Resilience","authors":"Ying Tang,&nbsp;Christopher A. Julian,&nbsp;Kelsey S. Braun,&nbsp;Sharon A. Stinger,&nbsp;Stacey L. Williams","doi":"10.1007/s42844-023-00122-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>While possessing multiple stigmas is a common experience, research using a systematic method on this topic to quantify the total number of stigmas and their dimensions is very limited. The purpose of the current research is to examine the number and dimensions of multiple stigmas that university students experience and, moreover, to investigate whether self-compassion mediates the negative effect of multiple stigmas on resilience. Three studies (study 1: <i>n</i> = 476, study 2: <i>n</i> = 443, study 3: <i>n</i> = 321) were conducted in northern and southern locations of Appalachian United States, in which participants reported on their experience with multiple stigmas, self-compassion, and resilience. Depression, obesity, and poverty were the most frequently reported stigmas. Aligned with the hypotheses, the total number of multiple stigmas predicted lower resilience that was mediated by reduced self-compassion. Furthermore, after quantifying the six dimensions of stigma (disruptiveness, origin, visibility, peril, aesthetics, and persistence; Jones et al., 1984) with the taxonomy developed by Pachankis et al. (<i>Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin</i>, 44:451–474, 2018), our results clarified that the disruptiveness of stigma consistently predicted lower resilience, mediated by weakened self-compassion. Other dimensions had significant but less consistent relationships with resilience and self-compassion. These results contribute to the literature on multiple stigmas and thereby their associations with outcomes such as resilience. The important mediating role of self-compassion is also highlighted and underscores an important pathway between multiple stigmas and resilience, which informs our discussion on the implications for the design of prevention and intervention programs on university campuses.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72113,"journal":{"name":"Adversity and resilience science","volume":"5 3","pages":"333 - 350"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adversity and resilience science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42844-023-00122-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While possessing multiple stigmas is a common experience, research using a systematic method on this topic to quantify the total number of stigmas and their dimensions is very limited. The purpose of the current research is to examine the number and dimensions of multiple stigmas that university students experience and, moreover, to investigate whether self-compassion mediates the negative effect of multiple stigmas on resilience. Three studies (study 1: n = 476, study 2: n = 443, study 3: n = 321) were conducted in northern and southern locations of Appalachian United States, in which participants reported on their experience with multiple stigmas, self-compassion, and resilience. Depression, obesity, and poverty were the most frequently reported stigmas. Aligned with the hypotheses, the total number of multiple stigmas predicted lower resilience that was mediated by reduced self-compassion. Furthermore, after quantifying the six dimensions of stigma (disruptiveness, origin, visibility, peril, aesthetics, and persistence; Jones et al., 1984) with the taxonomy developed by Pachankis et al. (Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44:451–474, 2018), our results clarified that the disruptiveness of stigma consistently predicted lower resilience, mediated by weakened self-compassion. Other dimensions had significant but less consistent relationships with resilience and self-compassion. These results contribute to the literature on multiple stigmas and thereby their associations with outcomes such as resilience. The important mediating role of self-compassion is also highlighted and underscores an important pathway between multiple stigmas and resilience, which informs our discussion on the implications for the design of prevention and intervention programs on university campuses.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多重污名及其维度:自我同情在降低复原力中的中介作用
虽然拥有多重烙印是一种常见的经历,但使用系统方法量化烙印总数及其维度的研究却非常有限。本研究的目的是考察大学生所经历的多重鄙视的数量和维度,此外,还考察自我同情是否能调节多重鄙视对复原力的负面影响。三项研究(研究1:n = 476;研究2:n = 443;研究3:n = 321)分别在美国阿巴拉契亚地区的北部和南部进行,参与者报告了他们经历的多重污名、自我同情和复原力。抑郁、肥胖和贫困是最常报告的污名。与假设一致的是,多重鄙视的总数预示着较低的复原力,而复原力的降低则是由自我同情的减少所中介的。此外,在用Pachankis等(《人格与社会心理学通报》,44:451-474,2018年)制定的分类标准量化了成见的六个维度(破坏性、起源、可见性、危险性、美学和持久性;Jones等,1984年)后,我们的结果明确指出,成见的破坏性始终预示着较低的复原力,并以自我同情的减弱为中介。其他维度与复原力和自我同情的关系显著,但不太一致。这些结果为有关多重成见及其与抗逆力等结果的关联的文献做出了贡献。研究还强调了自我同情的重要中介作用,并强调了多重鄙视和复原力之间的重要途径,这为我们讨论大学校园预防和干预计划的设计意义提供了参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Resilience in Higher Education: The Role of Coping Strategies in Promoting Effective Adaptation Among University Students Positive Childhood Experiences and Adolescence Self-Regulation: A Serial Mediation Through Social Connectedness and Dispositional Hope The Relationship Between Positive Childhood Experiences and Emotional Disorders: A Meta-Analysis Parents with Adverse Childhood Experiences: Exploring Buffering Effects of a Brief Couple Intervention Adversity and Resilience in Children With Moderate-to-profound Intellectual Disabilities: A Multi-source, Multiple-case Study Across Developmental Stages
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1