COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF PARENTAL PERCEPTIONS OF THE ORAL HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE OF AUTISTIC AND NON-AUTISTIC CHILDREN AFTER FULL MOUTH REHABILITATION UNDER GENERAL ANESTHESIA

Noor AL Aswad, A. Abushanan, Saqib Ali
{"title":"COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF PARENTAL PERCEPTIONS OF THE ORAL HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE OF AUTISTIC AND NON-AUTISTIC CHILDREN AFTER FULL MOUTH REHABILITATION UNDER GENERAL ANESTHESIA","authors":"Noor AL Aswad, A. Abushanan, Saqib Ali","doi":"10.52764/jms.23.31.4.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To compare the parental perceptions of the oral health-related quality of life (OHRQOL) of autistic and non-autistic children after full mouth rehabilitation under general anesthesia (GA). Methods and Materials: The study included 114 autistic children and 116 children without autism. Two years after receiving therapy under GA, participating parents completed a condensed version of the Perceptions Questionnaire (P-CPQ) and Family Impact Scale (FIS).  Demographic data was collected. Oral symptoms, social health, psychology, functional limitation, and family affect ratings. Mean, standard deviation and statistical differences between groups were analyzed using SPSS. Results: Children with autism received higher overall P-CPQ scores than children without autism, according to the frequency distribution of the P-CPQ for parental perception when children with and without autism were compared. In all four domains, when scores were compared according to the domain, there was no statistically significant difference in the scores. According to the FIS frequency distribution, children with autism had higher total FIS scores than children without the condition. The change was not statistically significant, though. Only parental emotions showed a statistically significant difference when scores were examined by domain. Conclusion: Children with autism and children without autism score the same on the P-CPQ, indicating that the impact of comprehensive rehabilitation under GA is positive for both types of children. Parent emotions may not change immediately following the complete rehabilitation under GA which may be required to be handled separately to boost the confidence of the patient. Keywords: Autistic, children, general anesthesia, parents, perception","PeriodicalId":16486,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52764/jms.23.31.4.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the parental perceptions of the oral health-related quality of life (OHRQOL) of autistic and non-autistic children after full mouth rehabilitation under general anesthesia (GA). Methods and Materials: The study included 114 autistic children and 116 children without autism. Two years after receiving therapy under GA, participating parents completed a condensed version of the Perceptions Questionnaire (P-CPQ) and Family Impact Scale (FIS).  Demographic data was collected. Oral symptoms, social health, psychology, functional limitation, and family affect ratings. Mean, standard deviation and statistical differences between groups were analyzed using SPSS. Results: Children with autism received higher overall P-CPQ scores than children without autism, according to the frequency distribution of the P-CPQ for parental perception when children with and without autism were compared. In all four domains, when scores were compared according to the domain, there was no statistically significant difference in the scores. According to the FIS frequency distribution, children with autism had higher total FIS scores than children without the condition. The change was not statistically significant, though. Only parental emotions showed a statistically significant difference when scores were examined by domain. Conclusion: Children with autism and children without autism score the same on the P-CPQ, indicating that the impact of comprehensive rehabilitation under GA is positive for both types of children. Parent emotions may not change immediately following the complete rehabilitation under GA which may be required to be handled separately to boost the confidence of the patient. Keywords: Autistic, children, general anesthesia, parents, perception
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较评估自闭症儿童和非自闭症儿童在全身麻醉下进行全口康复治疗后家长对口腔健康相关生活质量的看法
研究目的比较自闭症儿童和非自闭症儿童在全身麻醉(GA)下进行全口康复治疗后,家长对口腔健康相关生活质量(OHRQOL)的看法。方法和材料:研究包括 114 名自闭症儿童和 116 名非自闭症儿童。在接受全身麻醉治疗两年后,参与研究的家长填写了一份精简版感知问卷(P-CPQ)和家庭影响量表(FIS)。 收集了人口统计学数据。口腔症状、社会健康、心理、功能限制和家庭影响评分。使用 SPSS 对平均值、标准差和组间差异进行了统计分析。结果比较自闭症儿童和非自闭症儿童时,根据家长感知的 P-CPQ 频率分布,自闭症儿童的 P-CPQ 总分高于非自闭症儿童。在所有四个领域中,如果按照领域进行比较,得分没有显著的统计学差异。根据 FIS 频率分布,自闭症儿童的 FIS 总分高于非自闭症儿童。但这一变化在统计学上并不显著。按领域进行评分时,只有父母的情绪在统计学上有显著差异。结论自闭症儿童和非自闭症儿童在 P-CPQ 上的得分相同,这表明根据 GA 进行的综合康复对两类儿童都有积极影响。自闭症儿童和非自闭症儿童在P-CPQ上的得分相同,说明GA综合康复治疗对两类儿童均有积极影响。关键词自闭症 儿童 全身麻醉 家长 感知
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A New Self-expanding, Large-caliber Ureteral Stent Applied for Bilateral Long-segment Ureteral Strictures — A Case Report A Case Report of Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Pericardiectomy for Postpericardiotomy Recurrent Loculated Pericardial Effusion Dynamics of Urine Electrolytes in Term Neonates during the 1st Week of Life Extreme Delta Brush Electroencephalography Pattern in Anti-yo Encephalitis: A Case Report An Alternative Way to Manage Intraoperative Tear of Cuff Inflation Line of the Endotracheal Tube during Ophthalmic Surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1