FROM CORONAVIRUSES TO CORONAVIRUSES

Irina V. Kiseleva, T. Musaeva
{"title":"FROM CORONAVIRUSES TO CORONAVIRUSES","authors":"Irina V. Kiseleva, T. Musaeva","doi":"10.15789/2220-7619-fct-15641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The official history of the discovery of human coronaviruses dates back to 1965, when the first coronavirus B814, which has now been lost, was isolated on the organ culture of the trachea of a human embryo from the nasal swabs of a patient with acute respiratory disease. However, this date can only be an intermediate stage on its the long evolutionary path. Paleovirological studies have shown that coronaviruses could have appeared as early as the Stone Age - in the Upper Paleolithic era, and East Asia is called their place of origin a region that is well known to virologists as the source of many highly pathogenic influenza viruses and new coronaviruses, such as SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, and SARS-CoV-2. This makes us take a different look at the seeming innocence of seasonal coronaviruses that circulated before 2002, when a human pathogenic virus appeared that caused SARS. This also fits well into the assumption about the coronavirus nature of the 1889 Russian flu pandemic. Today, four seasonal coronaviruses and three new, pathogenic for humans are known. Two seasonal coronaviruses (229E and NL63) belong to the genus Alphacoronavirus, 2 others (OC43 and HKU1) and three new coronaviruses (SARS, MERS and SARS-CoV-2) belong to the genus Betacoronavirus. In this review, we have focused on the extreme points seasonal coronaviruses and pandemic SARS-CoV-2. We tried to draw an analogy between them and identify the main features that distinguish them. From the point of view of epidemiology and clinic, they have in common only the airborne transmission route, characteristic of all respiratory viruses, and the ubiquitous distribution, the nature and intensity of which were not significantly affected by the influenza epidemics/pandemics. Seasonal coronaviruses continued to circulate even during the COVID-19 pandemic, when the majority of the other respiratory viruses had largely disappeared. Significant differences between seasonal coronaviruses and SARS-CoV-2 can be traced in the symptoms, severity and pathogenesis of the diseases they cause. At the structural level, they have a lot in common. These are taxonomic proximity, morphology, structure, physicochemical properties of virions, organization of the genome, the main stages of virus replication, etc. What made SARS-CoV-2 such aggressive? The few differences in the size of viral particles and viral genome that have been identified to date, the use or not of hemagglutinin esterase to penetrate the virus into a sensitive cell, attachment to different cell receptors cannot explain the significant difference in the severity of the infection caused by seasonal or pandemic coronavirus. Most likely, they are based on delicate molecular mechanisms that have yet to be discovered.","PeriodicalId":21412,"journal":{"name":"Russian Journal of Infection and Immunity","volume":"15 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian Journal of Infection and Immunity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15789/2220-7619-fct-15641","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The official history of the discovery of human coronaviruses dates back to 1965, when the first coronavirus B814, which has now been lost, was isolated on the organ culture of the trachea of a human embryo from the nasal swabs of a patient with acute respiratory disease. However, this date can only be an intermediate stage on its the long evolutionary path. Paleovirological studies have shown that coronaviruses could have appeared as early as the Stone Age - in the Upper Paleolithic era, and East Asia is called their place of origin a region that is well known to virologists as the source of many highly pathogenic influenza viruses and new coronaviruses, such as SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, and SARS-CoV-2. This makes us take a different look at the seeming innocence of seasonal coronaviruses that circulated before 2002, when a human pathogenic virus appeared that caused SARS. This also fits well into the assumption about the coronavirus nature of the 1889 Russian flu pandemic. Today, four seasonal coronaviruses and three new, pathogenic for humans are known. Two seasonal coronaviruses (229E and NL63) belong to the genus Alphacoronavirus, 2 others (OC43 and HKU1) and three new coronaviruses (SARS, MERS and SARS-CoV-2) belong to the genus Betacoronavirus. In this review, we have focused on the extreme points seasonal coronaviruses and pandemic SARS-CoV-2. We tried to draw an analogy between them and identify the main features that distinguish them. From the point of view of epidemiology and clinic, they have in common only the airborne transmission route, characteristic of all respiratory viruses, and the ubiquitous distribution, the nature and intensity of which were not significantly affected by the influenza epidemics/pandemics. Seasonal coronaviruses continued to circulate even during the COVID-19 pandemic, when the majority of the other respiratory viruses had largely disappeared. Significant differences between seasonal coronaviruses and SARS-CoV-2 can be traced in the symptoms, severity and pathogenesis of the diseases they cause. At the structural level, they have a lot in common. These are taxonomic proximity, morphology, structure, physicochemical properties of virions, organization of the genome, the main stages of virus replication, etc. What made SARS-CoV-2 such aggressive? The few differences in the size of viral particles and viral genome that have been identified to date, the use or not of hemagglutinin esterase to penetrate the virus into a sensitive cell, attachment to different cell receptors cannot explain the significant difference in the severity of the infection caused by seasonal or pandemic coronavirus. Most likely, they are based on delicate molecular mechanisms that have yet to be discovered.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从冠状病毒到冠状病毒
人类冠状病毒的正式发现历史可以追溯到 1965 年,当时从一名急性呼吸道疾病患者的鼻拭子中分离出了人类胚胎气管的器官培养物,并分离出了第一种冠状病毒 B814。然而,这个日期只能是其漫长进化道路上的一个中间阶段。古生物学研究表明,冠状病毒可能早在石器时代--旧石器时代上层就已出现,而东亚被称为冠状病毒的起源地,病毒学家们都知道该地区是许多高致病性流感病毒和新型冠状病毒(如 SARS-CoV、MERS-CoV 和 SARS-CoV-2)的来源地。这让我们不得不重新审视 2002 年之前流行的季节性冠状病毒似乎是无辜的,当时出现了一种导致 SARS 的人类致病病毒。这也完全符合对 1889 年俄罗斯流感大流行的冠状病毒性质的假设。目前,已知有四种季节性冠状病毒和三种新的人类致病病毒。两种季节性冠状病毒(229E 和 NL63)属于 Alphacoronavirus 属,另外两种(OC43 和 HKU1)和三种新型冠状病毒(SARS、MERS 和 SARS-CoV-2)属于 Betacoronavirus 属。在这篇综述中,我们重点讨论了季节性冠状病毒和大流行病 SARS-CoV-2 的极端情况。我们试图对它们进行类比,并找出区别它们的主要特征。从流行病学和临床的角度来看,它们的共同点仅在于空气传播途径(所有呼吸道病毒的特征)和无处不在的分布,其性质和强度并未受到流感流行病/大流行的显著影响。即使在 COVID-19 大流行期间,季节性冠状病毒仍在继续流行,而此时大多数其他呼吸道病毒已基本消失。季节性冠状病毒与 SARS-CoV-2 在症状、严重程度和致病机理方面存在显著差异。在结构层面,它们有许多共同点。这些共同点包括分类学上的近似性、形态、结构、病毒的理化性质、基因组的组织、病毒复制的主要阶段等。是什么让 SARS-CoV-2 如此具有侵略性?迄今发现的病毒颗粒大小和病毒基因组的一些差异、使用或不使用血凝素酯酶将病毒穿透敏感细胞、附着在不同的细胞受体上等,都无法解释季节性冠状病毒和大流行性冠状病毒造成的感染严重程度的显著差异。它们很可能是基于尚未发现的微妙分子机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mice microglia cytokine profile changes under the influence of HSV-1 Synthetic thymic hexapeptide in the correction of alterations of antibacterial immune defense and normalization of the profile of proinflammatory cytokines in immunocompromized Children with local unlimited acute peritonitis Balance of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines in young patients who passed active Immunization against SARS-CoV-2 during the COVID-19 Pandemic Conserved linear B-cell peptides among the influenza A viral neuraminidases enhance the cross-protective potential of inactivated whole-virion influenza vaccine Characteristics of virus-specific immunological reactions following COVID-19 vaccination in heart transplant recipients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1