PHYSICIANS AND DISRUPTION ON TELEMEDICINE: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW

Arief Priyo Nugroho, A. A. Pitaloka
{"title":"PHYSICIANS AND DISRUPTION ON TELEMEDICINE: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW","authors":"Arief Priyo Nugroho, A. A. Pitaloka","doi":"10.20473/jaki.v11i2.2023.244-353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Telemedicine has developed rapidly since the COVID-19 pandemic. Telemedicine applications have marked significant transformations in healthcare. Rapid changes in healthcare services inevitably affect health service providers, specifically physicians. Aims: This study examines physicians' responses to a disruptive era in the healthcare industry. Methods: This paper applies a systematic literature review approach to characterize physicians’ experiences, challenges, and obstacles in managing disruption in the health service delivery context. A comprehensive literature review was conducted using the Scopus database and borrowing PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) method. There were 78 articles included in the analysis. Results: This study found that doctors who use telemedicine experience several types of disruption. The studies that examine physicians’ experience in health service disruption tend to be dominant in 4 (four) out of 5 (five) disruption types. First, disruption to the current delivery mode. Second, disruption to clinical practice role and responsibility. Third, disruption to clinical practice role and responsibility. Fourth, disruption to the work environment. Meanwhile, the disruption in personal life becomes less elaborated in the telemedicine studies debate. Conclusion: It is essential to pay close attention to the disruptions that have an effect on physicians' personal lives. Personal life is essential because it benefits physicians and directly supports the quality and sustainability of telemedicine services. Keywords: Disruption, Physician, and Telemedicine.","PeriodicalId":32968,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Administrasi Kesehatan Indonesia","volume":"106 9-10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Administrasi Kesehatan Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20473/jaki.v11i2.2023.244-353","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Telemedicine has developed rapidly since the COVID-19 pandemic. Telemedicine applications have marked significant transformations in healthcare. Rapid changes in healthcare services inevitably affect health service providers, specifically physicians. Aims: This study examines physicians' responses to a disruptive era in the healthcare industry. Methods: This paper applies a systematic literature review approach to characterize physicians’ experiences, challenges, and obstacles in managing disruption in the health service delivery context. A comprehensive literature review was conducted using the Scopus database and borrowing PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) method. There were 78 articles included in the analysis. Results: This study found that doctors who use telemedicine experience several types of disruption. The studies that examine physicians’ experience in health service disruption tend to be dominant in 4 (four) out of 5 (five) disruption types. First, disruption to the current delivery mode. Second, disruption to clinical practice role and responsibility. Third, disruption to clinical practice role and responsibility. Fourth, disruption to the work environment. Meanwhile, the disruption in personal life becomes less elaborated in the telemedicine studies debate. Conclusion: It is essential to pay close attention to the disruptions that have an effect on physicians' personal lives. Personal life is essential because it benefits physicians and directly supports the quality and sustainability of telemedicine services. Keywords: Disruption, Physician, and Telemedicine.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医生和远程医疗的干扰:系统文献综述
背景:自 COVID-19 大流行以来,远程医疗发展迅速。远程医疗应用标志着医疗保健领域的重大变革。医疗服务的快速变化不可避免地会影响到医疗服务提供者,特别是医生。目的:本研究探讨了医生对医疗保健行业颠覆性时代的反应。研究方法本文采用系统的文献综述方法,描述了医生在管理医疗服务提供环境中的混乱时所遇到的经验、挑战和障碍。本文使用 Scopus 数据库和借鉴 PRISMA(系统综述和元分析首选报告项目)方法进行了全面的文献综述。共有 78 篇文章被纳入分析。研究结果本研究发现,使用远程医疗的医生会遇到几种类型的干扰。研究医生在医疗服务中断方面经历的研究往往在 5 种中断类型中的 4 种(4)占主导地位。第一,对当前提供模式的干扰。第二,对临床实践角色和责任的干扰。第三,对临床实践角色和责任的干扰。第四,对工作环境的干扰。同时,在远程医疗研究的讨论中,对个人生活干扰的阐述较少。结论:必须密切关注对医生个人生活的干扰。个人生活至关重要,因为它有利于医生,并直接支持远程医疗服务的质量和可持续性。关键词干扰、医生、远程医疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
VACCINATION ATTITUDE AMONG HEALTHCARE WORKERS AT THE EARLY PHASE OF COVID-19 IN MALAYSIA SEVERAL PILLARS OF HEALTH TRANSFORMATION IN INDONESIA: FROM RESILIENCE PHARMACEUTICAL SUPPLY, HEALTH INSURANCE, PRIMARY HEATH CARE, TO DIGITAL HEALTH HAS INCLUSIVE HEALTH ACCESS IN JAKARTA'S PUBLIC HEALTH CENTER BEEN FULFILLED? DETERMINE THE TARGET TO INCREASE PRIMARY HEALTHCARE UTILIZATION IN INDONESIA'S DISADVANTAGED AREAS EARLY STRESS DETECTION DURING PREGNANCY USING E-HEALTH IN THE PANDEMIC
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1