Issues that impact on effective family literacy provision in England

J. Swain, Greg Brooks
{"title":"Issues that impact on effective family literacy provision in England","authors":"J. Swain, Greg Brooks","doi":"10.54195/ijpe.18193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper raises and discusses a series of key issues that arose during a 20-month evaluation project concerning the impact of family literacy programmes on the skills of parents and their children. Using a range of mixed methods, the research was based on 74 family literacy programmes in England and involved 583 parents and their children. The majority of previous evaluations of family learning have been quantitative and concentrated on children’s literacy outcomes; they have tended to ignore issues from qualitative research (which can both enable and constrain effective provision), many of which are of great interest to policy-makers. The specific issues raised in this paper coalesce around themes of recruitment; accreditation; the educational profile of parents (including the scarcity of men); the physical teaching and learning environment; the competing agendas between local authorities and schools; and planning opportunities between adult family literacy tutors and early years teachers.","PeriodicalId":355712,"journal":{"name":"International Journal about Parents in Education","volume":"45 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal about Parents in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54195/ijpe.18193","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper raises and discusses a series of key issues that arose during a 20-month evaluation project concerning the impact of family literacy programmes on the skills of parents and their children. Using a range of mixed methods, the research was based on 74 family literacy programmes in England and involved 583 parents and their children. The majority of previous evaluations of family learning have been quantitative and concentrated on children’s literacy outcomes; they have tended to ignore issues from qualitative research (which can both enable and constrain effective provision), many of which are of great interest to policy-makers. The specific issues raised in this paper coalesce around themes of recruitment; accreditation; the educational profile of parents (including the scarcity of men); the physical teaching and learning environment; the competing agendas between local authorities and schools; and planning opportunities between adult family literacy tutors and early years teachers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
影响英格兰有效开展家庭扫盲的问题
本文提出并讨论了一个为期 20 个月的评估项目中出现的一系列关键问题,该项目涉及家庭扫盲计划对父母及其子女技能的影响。这项研究采用了一系列混合方法,以英格兰的 74 项家庭扫盲计划为基础,涉及 583 名父母及其子女。以往对家庭学习的评估大多是定量评估,侧重于儿童的识字成果;它们往往忽视了定性研究中的问题(定性研究既能促进也能限制有效的提供),而其中许多问题是政策制定者非常感兴趣的。本文提出的具体问题主要围绕以下主题:招聘、认证、家长的教育背景(包括男性稀缺)、实际教学环境、地方当局和学校之间相互竞争的议程,以及成人家庭扫盲辅导员和幼儿教师之间的规划机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
What hinders and what motivates parents’ engagement in school? Thoughts about Democracy and Schools Teacher - Parent Partnerships: Preservice Teacher Competences and Attitudes during Teacher Training in the Netherlands On empowerment and disempowerment of parents ‘When I get upset about my children’s problem, I can’t concentrate’- International students reflect on their roles as parents while studying in the UK
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1