The concept of parent involvement. Some theoretical and empirical considerations

Joep T. A. Bakker, E. Denessen
{"title":"The concept of parent involvement. Some theoretical and empirical considerations","authors":"Joep T. A. Bakker, E. Denessen","doi":"10.54195/ijpe.18267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper focuses on some conceptual and methodological problems inherent in many empirical studies on parental involvement.  On the basis of twelve selected studies in which quantitative measures for parent involvement have been used, we discuss the reasons for the diversity of empirical outcomes, partly due to the complexity and multi-dimensionality of the concept, but also due to the variety of operationalizations as well as methods that have been applied to assess parents’ levels of involvement.  In particular, empirical evidence of involvement obtained with questionnaires should be considered as doubtful because of the biases in ratings, whereas the use of multiple informants, as suggested in the literature, does not seem satisfactory to overcome this problem.  We suggest the use more qualitative methods for measuring parent involvement, for example by interviewing parents in depth about their own accounts for their behaviours.  This seems also the best guarantee to detect the more hidden features of their involvement in their children’s education.","PeriodicalId":355712,"journal":{"name":"International Journal about Parents in Education","volume":"31 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal about Parents in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54195/ijpe.18267","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper focuses on some conceptual and methodological problems inherent in many empirical studies on parental involvement.  On the basis of twelve selected studies in which quantitative measures for parent involvement have been used, we discuss the reasons for the diversity of empirical outcomes, partly due to the complexity and multi-dimensionality of the concept, but also due to the variety of operationalizations as well as methods that have been applied to assess parents’ levels of involvement.  In particular, empirical evidence of involvement obtained with questionnaires should be considered as doubtful because of the biases in ratings, whereas the use of multiple informants, as suggested in the literature, does not seem satisfactory to overcome this problem.  We suggest the use more qualitative methods for measuring parent involvement, for example by interviewing parents in depth about their own accounts for their behaviours.  This seems also the best guarantee to detect the more hidden features of their involvement in their children’s education.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
家长参与的概念。一些理论和经验方面的考虑
本文重点讨论了许多关于家长参与的实证研究中固有的一些概念和方法问题。 我们选取了 12 项采用定量方法衡量家长参与程度的研究,在此基础上讨论了实证研究结果多种多样的原因,部分原因是这一概念的复杂性和多维性,另一部分原因是评估家长参与程度的操作和方法多种多样。 特别是,通过问卷调查获得的参与度经验证据应被视为可疑,因为评分存在偏差,而文献中建议的使用多方信息提供者似乎并不能令人满意地克服这一问题。 我们建议使用更多的定性方法来衡量家长的参与情况,例如深入采访家长,了解他们对自己行为的解释。 这似乎也是发现家长参与子女教育的隐性特征的最佳保证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
What hinders and what motivates parents’ engagement in school? Thoughts about Democracy and Schools Teacher - Parent Partnerships: Preservice Teacher Competences and Attitudes during Teacher Training in the Netherlands On empowerment and disempowerment of parents ‘When I get upset about my children’s problem, I can’t concentrate’- International students reflect on their roles as parents while studying in the UK
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1