Psychosocial Impact of Coronavirus Disease 2019 and Related State-imposed Lockdown on Patients Presenting with Respiratory Complaints: A Study from North India

Ravi Kumar Garg, Kranti Garg, Vishal Chopra
{"title":"Psychosocial Impact of Coronavirus Disease 2019 and Related State-imposed Lockdown on Patients Presenting with Respiratory Complaints: A Study from North India","authors":"Ravi Kumar Garg, Kranti Garg, Vishal Chopra","doi":"10.4103/ijsp.ijsp_261_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Clinical presentation of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mimics many respiratory ailments. The aim of this study was to explore the psychosocial impact of COVID-19 and subsequent state-imposed lockdown on patients presenting with respiratory complaints. This was a prospective study on 82 outpatients at a tertiary care institute from North India during the period of strict lockdown. Baseline assessment was conducted using socioclinical pro forma, COVID-19-related questionnaire, lockdown-related questionnaire, and General Health Questionnaire-12 (GHQ-12) Hindi version. Reassessment was done twice: immediately and 41–45 days after relaxation of strict lockdown. Quality of life (QOL) at first and second follow-up versus the prelockdown times (Score A and Score C) and first follow-up versus unlockdown (Score B) was noted. Psychological distress was experienced in 45.1% and 17.1% of patients at baseline and first follow-up (P < 0.001). Clinical symptoms, worry for COVID-19, negative thoughts, and total score (lockdown) decreased significantly at first follow-up. The mean C score was significantly better than the mean A score (P < 0.001). Baseline and follow-up psychological distress was significantly more in those with poorer values of total score (lockdown) and its domains. On logistic regression, follow-up GHQ-12 correlated positively with Domain 2 (P = 0.027; odds ratio [OR] = 0.7) and “worry for COVID” (P = 0.017; OR = 10.136). Persons presenting with respiratory complaints and experiencing “worry for COVID-19” at the start of the lockdown were more likely to also experience psychological distress, which decreased significantly but persisted for prolonged periods even after relaxation in lockdown. Policymakers, while indulging in mental health planning in pandemics, should not ignore this issue of development and perpetuation of psychological distress in such otherwise “psychologically normal” individuals.","PeriodicalId":55693,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Social Psychiatry","volume":"139 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Social Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijsp.ijsp_261_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Clinical presentation of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mimics many respiratory ailments. The aim of this study was to explore the psychosocial impact of COVID-19 and subsequent state-imposed lockdown on patients presenting with respiratory complaints. This was a prospective study on 82 outpatients at a tertiary care institute from North India during the period of strict lockdown. Baseline assessment was conducted using socioclinical pro forma, COVID-19-related questionnaire, lockdown-related questionnaire, and General Health Questionnaire-12 (GHQ-12) Hindi version. Reassessment was done twice: immediately and 41–45 days after relaxation of strict lockdown. Quality of life (QOL) at first and second follow-up versus the prelockdown times (Score A and Score C) and first follow-up versus unlockdown (Score B) was noted. Psychological distress was experienced in 45.1% and 17.1% of patients at baseline and first follow-up (P < 0.001). Clinical symptoms, worry for COVID-19, negative thoughts, and total score (lockdown) decreased significantly at first follow-up. The mean C score was significantly better than the mean A score (P < 0.001). Baseline and follow-up psychological distress was significantly more in those with poorer values of total score (lockdown) and its domains. On logistic regression, follow-up GHQ-12 correlated positively with Domain 2 (P = 0.027; odds ratio [OR] = 0.7) and “worry for COVID” (P = 0.017; OR = 10.136). Persons presenting with respiratory complaints and experiencing “worry for COVID-19” at the start of the lockdown were more likely to also experience psychological distress, which decreased significantly but persisted for prolonged periods even after relaxation in lockdown. Policymakers, while indulging in mental health planning in pandemics, should not ignore this issue of development and perpetuation of psychological distress in such otherwise “psychologically normal” individuals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2019 年冠状病毒疫情及相关国家封锁对出现呼吸道不适患者的社会心理影响:印度北部的一项研究
冠状病毒病 2019(COVID-19)的临床表现与许多呼吸道疾病相似。 本研究旨在探讨 COVID-19 和随后国家实施的封锁对呼吸道疾病患者的社会心理影响。 这是一项前瞻性研究,研究对象是印度北部一家三级医疗机构在严格封锁期间的 82 名门诊患者。使用社会临床表格、COVID-19 相关问卷、封锁相关问卷和一般健康问卷-12(GHQ-12)印地语版进行了基线评估。重新评估分两次进行:即刻和放松严格封锁后 41-45 天。第一次和第二次随访时的生活质量(QOL)与禁闭前相比(A 级和 C 级),以及第一次随访时与未禁闭时相比(B 级),均有记录。 分别有 45.1% 和 17.1% 的患者在基线和首次随访时感到心理困扰(P < 0.001)。在首次随访时,临床症状、对 COVID-19 的担忧、消极想法和总分(锁定)均显著下降。平均 C 评分明显优于平均 A 评分(P < 0.001)。在基线和随访中,总分(锁定)及其域值较差者的心理困扰明显较多。在逻辑回归中,随访 GHQ-12 与领域 2(P = 0.027;比值比 [OR] = 0.7)和 "担心 COVID"(P = 0.017;比值比 = 10.136)呈正相关。 在封锁开始时出现呼吸道不适症状并 "担心 COVID-19 "的人更有可能同时出现心理困扰,这种困扰明显减轻,但即使在封锁放松后仍会持续很长时间。政策制定者在制定大流行病的心理健康计划时,不应忽视这些原本 "心理正常 "的人的心理压力发展和持续问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊最新文献
State Initiated Insurance Coverages for Outpatient Therapies to Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders in India An Analytical Study on Depression among the Geriatric Population of Rural Field Practice Area of Private Medical College in Andhra Pradesh State Screening for Occupational Stress in Resident Doctors: A Preliminary Study Dementia in South Indian Cinema – A Film Review School Closures and the Impact on Screen Time and Behavior during the Pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1