Evaluation Of The Diagnostic And Predictive Performance Of Non-Invasive Models For Assessing Liver Fibrosis In Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection

R. E Eworo, N. A Ntamu, U. A Fabian, C. C Thomas, M. C Nsonwu, O. U Egom, R. U Basake, A. R Essien, I. M Ekam-Ukere, A. C Nsonwu-Anyanwu
{"title":"Evaluation Of The Diagnostic And Predictive Performance Of Non-Invasive Models For Assessing Liver Fibrosis In Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection","authors":"R. E Eworo, N. A Ntamu, U. A Fabian, C. C Thomas, M. C Nsonwu, O. U Egom, R. U Basake, A. R Essien, I. M Ekam-Ukere, A. C Nsonwu-Anyanwu","doi":"10.4314/gjpas.v29i2.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The performance of non-invasive models in the diagnosis and prediction of liver fibrosis have not been evaluated in all populations. This study evaluated the accuracy of gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase-to-platelets ratio index (GPRI), and S-index in the diagnosis and prediction of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection (CHBV). Fifty patients with CHBV and 40 control were recruited into this case-control study. Albumin (ALB), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), bilirubin, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) and platelet count (PLT) were determined by colorimetric methods and Sysmex XS-10000 haematology automated analyzer respectively. GPRI and S-index were computed. Data were analyzed using ANOVA, Pearson’s correlation and ROC curve at p<0.05. ALP, ALT, AST, GGT, GPRI and S-Index were higher (p<0.05), while ALB was lower (p<0.05) in patients with liver fibrosis (LF), compared to patients with CHBV. ALP, GGT, GPRI and S-index were higher (p<0.05), while ALB and PLT were lower (p<0.05) in patients with CHBV compared to the controls. ALP, ALT, AST, GGT, GPRI and S-index were higher (p<0.05), while ALB was lower (p=0.000) in patients with LF compared to the controls. The area under the curve (AUROC) for S-index and GPRI were (AUC=0.835, P=0.000), GPRI (AUC=0.778, P=0.003). This study shows that both S-index and GPRI are good test instruments for evaluating liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B. S-index was a better marker than GPRI for predicting liver fibrosis.","PeriodicalId":12516,"journal":{"name":"Global Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/gjpas.v29i2.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The performance of non-invasive models in the diagnosis and prediction of liver fibrosis have not been evaluated in all populations. This study evaluated the accuracy of gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase-to-platelets ratio index (GPRI), and S-index in the diagnosis and prediction of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection (CHBV). Fifty patients with CHBV and 40 control were recruited into this case-control study. Albumin (ALB), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), bilirubin, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) and platelet count (PLT) were determined by colorimetric methods and Sysmex XS-10000 haematology automated analyzer respectively. GPRI and S-index were computed. Data were analyzed using ANOVA, Pearson’s correlation and ROC curve at p<0.05. ALP, ALT, AST, GGT, GPRI and S-Index were higher (p<0.05), while ALB was lower (p<0.05) in patients with liver fibrosis (LF), compared to patients with CHBV. ALP, GGT, GPRI and S-index were higher (p<0.05), while ALB and PLT were lower (p<0.05) in patients with CHBV compared to the controls. ALP, ALT, AST, GGT, GPRI and S-index were higher (p<0.05), while ALB was lower (p=0.000) in patients with LF compared to the controls. The area under the curve (AUROC) for S-index and GPRI were (AUC=0.835, P=0.000), GPRI (AUC=0.778, P=0.003). This study shows that both S-index and GPRI are good test instruments for evaluating liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B. S-index was a better marker than GPRI for predicting liver fibrosis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估慢性乙型肝炎病毒感染患者肝纤维化的非侵入性模型的诊断和预测性能
非侵入性模型在诊断和预测肝纤维化方面的性能尚未在所有人群中进行评估。本研究评估了γ-谷氨酰转肽酶与血小板比值指数(GPRI)和S指数在诊断和预测慢性乙型肝炎病毒感染(CHBV)患者肝纤维化方面的准确性。这项病例对照研究招募了 50 名慢性乙型肝炎病毒感染患者和 40 名对照组患者。白蛋白(ALB)、碱性磷酸酶(ALP)、丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)、天冬氨酸氨基转移酶(AST)、胆红素、γ-谷氨酰转肽酶(GGT)和血小板计数(PLT)分别通过比色法和 Sysmex XS-10000 血液学自动分析仪测定。计算了 GPRI 和 S 指数。数据采用方差分析、皮尔逊相关分析和 ROC 曲线分析,P<0.05。与 CHBV 患者相比,肝纤维化(LF)患者的 ALP、ALT、AST、GGT、GPRI 和 S 指数较高(P<0.05),而 ALB 较低(P<0.05)。与对照组相比,CHBV 患者的 ALP、GGT、GPRI 和 S 指数较高(P<0.05),而 ALB 和 PLT 较低(P<0.05)。与对照组相比,LF 患者的 ALP、ALT、AST、GGT、GPRI 和 S 指数较高(P<0.05),而 ALB 较低(P=0.000)。S-index 和 GPRI 的曲线下面积(AUROC)分别为(AUC=0.835,P=0.000)和 GPRI(AUC=0.778,P=0.003)。本研究表明,S 指数和 GPRI 都是评估慢性乙型肝炎患者肝纤维化的良好检测工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Humic substances in soils of diverse parent materials in humid tropical environment of south east nigeria. Heavy Metal Contamination In Surface Water And Macrobrachium Tissues Along Eagle Island, Niger Delta, Nigeria Synthesis And Characterization Of Optical And Structural Properties Of Inorganic And Green Leaf Doped Sno Thin Films Deposited Using Spray Pyrolysis Comparative Cost-Benefits Analysis Among Rain-Fed And Irrigated Sugarcane Production Farming Systems In Bauchi State, Nigeria Prevalence And Determinants Of Malnutrition Among Under-Five Children In Selected Primary Schools In Nasarawa Town
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1