Construction of reflective thinking: A field independent student in numerical problems

Setiyani, S. Waluya, Y. L. Sukestiyarno, Adi Nur Cahyono
{"title":"Construction of reflective thinking: A field independent student in numerical problems","authors":"Setiyani, S. Waluya, Y. L. Sukestiyarno, Adi Nur Cahyono","doi":"10.22342/jme.v15i1.pp151-172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In educational settings, reflective thinking is often overlooked, with an excessive emphasis on final answers, resulting in students needing more ability to evaluate and reconstruct their problem-solving processes. The ability for reflective thinking is required by students in solving problems, including numerical problems. This study uses a qualitative approach to focus on field-independent students' numerical problem-solving processes. The data collection technique begins by administering the Group Embedded Figures Test (GEFT), a valid and reliable numeracy problem instrument, and conducting in-depth interviews. Two students with similar initial mathematical abilities and field-independent cognitive styles were selected as research subjects. Findings reveal that these students face challenges such as lengthy problem descriptions and a lack of confidence but gradually develop strategies, emphasizing repeated problem analysis, concept interconnections, and error awareness. Researcher-provided scaffolding facilitates critical reflection, enabling the construction of new ideas. These results have practical implications for teachers, suggesting the need to design lessons that cater to diverse cognitive styles, providing more complex problems to field-independent students to enhance their problem-solving skills.","PeriodicalId":37090,"journal":{"name":"Journal on Mathematics Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal on Mathematics Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v15i1.pp151-172","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In educational settings, reflective thinking is often overlooked, with an excessive emphasis on final answers, resulting in students needing more ability to evaluate and reconstruct their problem-solving processes. The ability for reflective thinking is required by students in solving problems, including numerical problems. This study uses a qualitative approach to focus on field-independent students' numerical problem-solving processes. The data collection technique begins by administering the Group Embedded Figures Test (GEFT), a valid and reliable numeracy problem instrument, and conducting in-depth interviews. Two students with similar initial mathematical abilities and field-independent cognitive styles were selected as research subjects. Findings reveal that these students face challenges such as lengthy problem descriptions and a lack of confidence but gradually develop strategies, emphasizing repeated problem analysis, concept interconnections, and error awareness. Researcher-provided scaffolding facilitates critical reflection, enabling the construction of new ideas. These results have practical implications for teachers, suggesting the need to design lessons that cater to diverse cognitive styles, providing more complex problems to field-independent students to enhance their problem-solving skills.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
构建反思性思维:数字问题中的实地独立学生
在教育环境中,反思性思维往往被忽视,过分强调最终答案,导致学生需要更多的能力来评估和重建他们解决问题的过程。学生在解决问题(包括数字问题)时需要具备反思能力。本研究采用定性方法,重点研究独立于现场的学生解决数字问题的过程。数据收集技术首先通过有效可靠的计算问题工具--分组嵌入式图形测试(GEFT)进行,然后进行深度访谈。研究选取了两名初始数学能力相近、认知风格与领域无关的学生作为研究对象。研究结果显示,这些学生面临着问题描述冗长、缺乏自信等挑战,但他们逐渐形成了自己的策略,强调对问题的反复分析、概念之间的相互联系以及错误意识。研究人员提供的支架促进了批判性反思,使学生能够构建新思路。这些结果对教师具有实际意义,表明有必要设计适合不同认知风格的课程,为不依赖实地的学生提供更复杂的问题,以提高他们解决问题的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal on Mathematics Education
Journal on Mathematics Education Mathematics-Mathematics (all)
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
What explains early numeracy achievement: A comparison of South Africa and China Exploring default-interventionist interaction of thinking activity types on probability problem-solving Mathematics learning orientation: Mathematical creative thinking ability or creative disposition? Promoting socioeconomic equity through automatic formative assessment Aligning numeracy task design with SDG goals: Nutrition facts as a context for prospective mathematics teachers' problem posing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1