Can the MIRACLE2 Score Be Used in the Prehospital Environment and Is It Useful? An Observational Study

Q3 Nursing Air Medical Journal Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.amj.2023.11.008
Sarah Morton MBBS, FRCA, FICM , Chris Gough BMBS, FRCEM
{"title":"Can the MIRACLE2 Score Be Used in the Prehospital Environment and Is It Useful? An Observational Study","authors":"Sarah Morton MBBS, FRCA, FICM ,&nbsp;Chris Gough BMBS, FRCEM","doi":"10.1016/j.amj.2023.11.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The MIRACLE<sub>2</sub><span> score has been developed for use in a primary percutaneous coronary intervention<span> center. It is unclear if it is feasible in the helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS) setting.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The computerized system at 1 UK HEMS was interrogated between December 1, 2020, and May 1, 2022, for the components of the MIRACLE<sub>2</sub> score (recorded contemporaneously) plus demographics and outcomes in all post–return of spontaneous circulation patients conveyed to the hospital. pH was excluded because of no point-of-care testing resulting in a modified MIRACLE<sub>2</sub> score (maximum score of 9). Data were analyzed using the chi-square test; <em>P</em> &lt; .05 was statistically significant.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>Three hundred thirty patients (240 males) with out-of-hospital cardiac arrests were reviewed. Ninety-two adult patients with nontraumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrests had sustained return of spontaneous circulation and a median MIRACLE</span><sub>2</sub><span> score of 4 (range, 0-7). Forty-seven patients died before hospital discharge; the median MIRACLE</span><sub>2</sub> score was higher in those who died (4) than those who survived (1.5, <em>P</em><span><span> &lt; .01); 90.3% of those with a score ≥ 5 were triaged to an emergency department rather than directly to a </span>catheterization laboratory.</span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>A modified MIRACLE<sub>2</sub> score can be calculated in the HEMS setting. The benefit of point-of-care testing pH requires investigation. There may be a benefit in predicting outcomes in this nondifferentiated group, but additional research is required.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35737,"journal":{"name":"Air Medical Journal","volume":"43 2","pages":"Pages 146-150"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Air Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1067991X23002602","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The MIRACLE2 score has been developed for use in a primary percutaneous coronary intervention center. It is unclear if it is feasible in the helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS) setting.

Methods

The computerized system at 1 UK HEMS was interrogated between December 1, 2020, and May 1, 2022, for the components of the MIRACLE2 score (recorded contemporaneously) plus demographics and outcomes in all post–return of spontaneous circulation patients conveyed to the hospital. pH was excluded because of no point-of-care testing resulting in a modified MIRACLE2 score (maximum score of 9). Data were analyzed using the chi-square test; P < .05 was statistically significant.

Results

Three hundred thirty patients (240 males) with out-of-hospital cardiac arrests were reviewed. Ninety-two adult patients with nontraumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrests had sustained return of spontaneous circulation and a median MIRACLE2 score of 4 (range, 0-7). Forty-seven patients died before hospital discharge; the median MIRACLE2 score was higher in those who died (4) than those who survived (1.5, P < .01); 90.3% of those with a score ≥ 5 were triaged to an emergency department rather than directly to a catheterization laboratory.

Conclusion

A modified MIRACLE2 score can be calculated in the HEMS setting. The benefit of point-of-care testing pH requires investigation. There may be a benefit in predicting outcomes in this nondifferentiated group, but additional research is required.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
MIRACLE2 评分可用于院前环境吗?观察研究
目的 MIRACLE2 评分是为经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中心开发的。方法 在 2020 年 12 月 1 日至 2022 年 5 月 1 日期间,对英国 1 家直升机紧急医疗服务机构的计算机系统进行了调查,以了解 MIRACLE2 评分的组成部分(实时记录)以及所有转运至医院的自发循环恢复后患者的人口统计学特征和结果。采用卡方检验对数据进行分析;P <.05具有统计学意义。结果对330名院外心脏骤停患者(240名男性)进行了复查。92名非创伤性院外心脏骤停的成年患者持续恢复了自主循环,MIRACLE2评分中位数为4(范围0-7)。47名患者在出院前死亡;死亡患者的中位 MIRACLE2 评分(4)高于存活患者(1.5,P <.01);评分≥5 的患者中有 90.3% 被分流到急诊科,而不是直接送到导管室。需要研究床旁检测 pH 值的益处。在预测未分化人群的预后方面可能有好处,但还需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Air Medical Journal
Air Medical Journal Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
112
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Air Medical Journal is the official journal of the five leading air medical transport associations in the United States. AMJ is the premier provider of information for the medical transport industry, addressing the unique concerns of medical transport physicians, nurses, pilots, paramedics, emergency medical technicians, communication specialists, and program administrators. The journal contains practical how-to articles, debates on controversial industry issues, legislative updates, case studies, and peer-reviewed original research articles covering all aspects of the medical transport profession.
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents Editorial Board Psychomotor Vigilance Testing on Neonatal Transport: A Western Australian Experience Pericardiocentesis During Transport for Cardiac Tamponade Complicating Acute Type A Aortic Dissection Recent Outcomes Research in Helicopter Emergency Medical Services: A Scoping Review of Publication Year 2023 Additions to the Helicopter Outcomes Assessment Research Database
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1