Understanding Advanced Practitioner Prescriptive Privileges for Anticancer Therapies: A National Survey

Archana Ajmera, MSN, ANP-BC, AOCNP, Leigh Boehmer, PharmD, BCOP, Christa Marie Braun-Inglis, DNP, APRN, FNP-BC, AOCNP, Brianna Hoffner, MSN, ANP-BC, AOCNP, FAPO, Maria Matta, MPH, Rana R. McKay, MD
{"title":"Understanding Advanced Practitioner Prescriptive Privileges for Anticancer Therapies: A National Survey","authors":"Archana Ajmera, MSN, ANP-BC, AOCNP, Leigh Boehmer, PharmD, BCOP, Christa Marie Braun-Inglis, DNP, APRN, FNP-BC, AOCNP, Brianna Hoffner, MSN, ANP-BC, AOCNP, FAPO, Maria Matta, MPH, Rana R. McKay, MD","doi":"10.6004/jadpro.2023.14.7.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Oncology advanced practitioners (APs) work in collaboration with physicians to provide high-quality, specialized oncology care. Data are lacking on individual AP function within different practice settings, specifically around the prescribing of anticancer therapies. Our primary aim was to conduct a prospective, national, web-based survey to understand AP roles in prescribing anticancer therapies and the related privileging process(es) in both academic and community oncology practice settings. A 38-question survey was developed based on a review of published oncology AP data sets, expert input, and cognitive interviews with key AP informants. Survey domains included basic respondent demographics, practice setting information, and prescribing and privileging practices. The survey was distributed by the Association of Community Cancer Centers (ACCC) and the Advanced Practitioner Society for Hematology and Oncology (APSHO) in late 2022. 180 individuals responded, and 135 oncology APs completed the survey. The majority of respondents practice in states that allow prescriptive privileging for anticancer therapies. Only half of those that have prescriptive privileging have an established privileging and competency process at their practice setting. Among the nurse practitioners and physician assistants practicing in primarily independent roles, only about half can prescribe both standard-of-care and investigational therapies. This national survey provides valuable insights into the prescribing practices of oncology APs. The findings highlight the need to further develop standardized privileging and competency strategies within the AP community. By addressing these gaps, APs can play a crucial role in addressing workforce shortages in oncology and optimizing patient outcomes.","PeriodicalId":17176,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Advanced Practitioner in Oncology","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Advanced Practitioner in Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6004/jadpro.2023.14.7.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Oncology advanced practitioners (APs) work in collaboration with physicians to provide high-quality, specialized oncology care. Data are lacking on individual AP function within different practice settings, specifically around the prescribing of anticancer therapies. Our primary aim was to conduct a prospective, national, web-based survey to understand AP roles in prescribing anticancer therapies and the related privileging process(es) in both academic and community oncology practice settings. A 38-question survey was developed based on a review of published oncology AP data sets, expert input, and cognitive interviews with key AP informants. Survey domains included basic respondent demographics, practice setting information, and prescribing and privileging practices. The survey was distributed by the Association of Community Cancer Centers (ACCC) and the Advanced Practitioner Society for Hematology and Oncology (APSHO) in late 2022. 180 individuals responded, and 135 oncology APs completed the survey. The majority of respondents practice in states that allow prescriptive privileging for anticancer therapies. Only half of those that have prescriptive privileging have an established privileging and competency process at their practice setting. Among the nurse practitioners and physician assistants practicing in primarily independent roles, only about half can prescribe both standard-of-care and investigational therapies. This national survey provides valuable insights into the prescribing practices of oncology APs. The findings highlight the need to further develop standardized privileging and competency strategies within the AP community. By addressing these gaps, APs can play a crucial role in addressing workforce shortages in oncology and optimizing patient outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解抗癌疗法的高级医师处方权:全国调查
肿瘤进修医师(APs)与医生合作,提供高质量的专业肿瘤治疗。目前尚缺乏有关个体执业医师在不同执业环境中职能的数据,特别是围绕抗癌疗法处方的数据。我们的主要目的是开展一项前瞻性的全国性网络调查,以了解抗癌治疗师在开具抗癌治疗处方方面的作用,以及在学术和社区肿瘤学实践环境中的相关特权流程。根据对已发表的肿瘤学 AP 数据集的回顾、专家意见以及对主要 AP 信息提供者的认知访谈,制定了一份包含 38 个问题的调查问卷。调查领域包括受访者的基本人口统计学特征、实践环境信息以及处方和特权实践。调查由社区癌症中心协会 (ACCC) 和血液学与肿瘤学高级执业医师协会 (APSHO) 于 2022 年底发布。180 人作出了回应,135 名肿瘤科执业医师完成了调查。大多数受访者在允许抗癌疗法处方权的州执业。在允许处方特权的受访者中,只有一半的人在其执业机构建立了特权和能力流程。在以独立执业为主的执业护士和执业助理医师中,只有约一半的人可以同时开具标准疗法和研究疗法的处方。这项全国性调查为了解肿瘤科助理医师的处方实践提供了宝贵的资料。调查结果表明,有必要在全科医生群体中进一步制定标准化的特权和能力战略。通过弥补这些差距,全科医生可以在解决肿瘤学人才短缺和优化患者治疗效果方面发挥重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Multiple Myeloma: A Call to Action A Real-World Evidence Primer for Advanced Practice Providers: Integrating P-Reality X Into Shared Decision-Making for People With HR+/HER2− Metastatic Breast Cancer Impact of an Oncology Clinical Pharmacist Intervention on Clinical Trial Enrollment in The US Oncology Network’s MYLUNG Consortium Beyond Standard Endocrine Therapy: A New Adjuvant Treatment in High-Risk Early Breast Cancer Evaluating the User-Perceived Benefit of a Virtual Lung Cancer Patient Education and Support Community: LVNG With Lung Cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1