Multidetector computed tomography evaluation of obstructive jaundice: a cross-sectional study from a tertiary hospital of Nepal

Sujan Khadka, A. Mahat, G. Yadav, Priya Thapa, U. Mishra, Manoj Bhattarai, L. Awale, Anju Pradhan, M. K. Gupta
{"title":"Multidetector computed tomography evaluation of obstructive jaundice: a cross-sectional study from a tertiary hospital of Nepal","authors":"Sujan Khadka, A. Mahat, G. Yadav, Priya Thapa, U. Mishra, Manoj Bhattarai, L. Awale, Anju Pradhan, M. K. Gupta","doi":"10.1097/GH9.0000000000000367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The utilization of advanced multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) technology along with postprocessing reconstruction techniques has significantly enhanced the clarity of visualization of the hepato-biliary tree. Therefore, this study was conducted to evaluate the diagnostic statistics of MDCT and its associated features in the evaluation of obstructive jaundice, with respect to surgical or histopathological diagnoses. Methods and methodology: The authors conducted a cross-sectional study among 30 participants with obstructive jaundice using purposive sampling. The authors calculated the diagnostic statistics of non-neoplastic and neoplastic types, along with specific etiologies of obstructive jaundice identified through MDCT using a statistical package for social sciences (SPSS) v21 and MedCalc v12.3.0. The ethical clearance was obtained from the institutional review committee of BPKIHS, Nepal (Ref no: Acd/291/075/076-IRC). Results: The sensitivity and the negative predictive value of MDCT for non-neoplastic cause to detect obstructive jaundice were 100% (95% CI: 79.41–100.00) and 100% (95% CI: 75.29–100.00), while the specificity and the positive predictive value for neoplastic cause to detect obstructive jaundice were 100% (95% CI: 79.41–100.00) and 100% (95% CI: 75.29–100.00), respectively. Similarly, the accuracy for either non-neoplastic or neoplastic cause was 96.67% (95% CI: 82.78–99.92). The most common cause of obstructive jaundice was choledocholithiasis (33.34%) followed by cholangiocarcinoma (20%), ampullary carcinoma (13.33%), and choledochal cyst (13.33%). The diagnostic accuracy of the individual etiology of common causes of obstructive jaundice ranged from 82.78 to 100%. Biliary obstruction was most frequently observed in the periampullary region (83.33%), followed by the proximal common bile duct (6.67%), hilar region (6.67%), and intrahepatic region (3.33%). Conclusion: The MDCT could serve as the initial and time-efficient excellent imaging modality for diagnosing various causes of obstructive jaundice with greater accuracy. It can differentiate non-neoplastic from neoplastic causes of obstructive jaundice.","PeriodicalId":506642,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Surgery: Global Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Surgery: Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GH9.0000000000000367","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The utilization of advanced multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) technology along with postprocessing reconstruction techniques has significantly enhanced the clarity of visualization of the hepato-biliary tree. Therefore, this study was conducted to evaluate the diagnostic statistics of MDCT and its associated features in the evaluation of obstructive jaundice, with respect to surgical or histopathological diagnoses. Methods and methodology: The authors conducted a cross-sectional study among 30 participants with obstructive jaundice using purposive sampling. The authors calculated the diagnostic statistics of non-neoplastic and neoplastic types, along with specific etiologies of obstructive jaundice identified through MDCT using a statistical package for social sciences (SPSS) v21 and MedCalc v12.3.0. The ethical clearance was obtained from the institutional review committee of BPKIHS, Nepal (Ref no: Acd/291/075/076-IRC). Results: The sensitivity and the negative predictive value of MDCT for non-neoplastic cause to detect obstructive jaundice were 100% (95% CI: 79.41–100.00) and 100% (95% CI: 75.29–100.00), while the specificity and the positive predictive value for neoplastic cause to detect obstructive jaundice were 100% (95% CI: 79.41–100.00) and 100% (95% CI: 75.29–100.00), respectively. Similarly, the accuracy for either non-neoplastic or neoplastic cause was 96.67% (95% CI: 82.78–99.92). The most common cause of obstructive jaundice was choledocholithiasis (33.34%) followed by cholangiocarcinoma (20%), ampullary carcinoma (13.33%), and choledochal cyst (13.33%). The diagnostic accuracy of the individual etiology of common causes of obstructive jaundice ranged from 82.78 to 100%. Biliary obstruction was most frequently observed in the periampullary region (83.33%), followed by the proximal common bile duct (6.67%), hilar region (6.67%), and intrahepatic region (3.33%). Conclusion: The MDCT could serve as the initial and time-efficient excellent imaging modality for diagnosing various causes of obstructive jaundice with greater accuracy. It can differentiate non-neoplastic from neoplastic causes of obstructive jaundice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阻塞性黄疸的多载体计算机断层扫描评估:尼泊尔一家三级医院的横断面研究
背景:先进的多载体计算机断层扫描(MDCT)技术和后处理重建技术的应用大大提高了肝胆管的可视化清晰度。因此,本研究旨在评估 MDCT 的诊断统计数据及其在评估梗阻性黄疸时与手术或组织病理学诊断相关的特征。方法和手段:作者采用目的取样法对 30 名阻塞性黄疸患者进行了横断面研究。作者使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)v21 和 MedCalc v12.3.0 计算了非肿瘤和肿瘤类型的诊断统计数据,以及通过 MDCT 确定的阻塞性黄疸的具体病因。该研究已获得尼泊尔 BPKIHS 机构审查委员会的伦理许可(编号:Acd/291/075/076-IRC)。结果MDCT检测阻塞性黄疸的非肿瘤性原因的灵敏度和阴性预测值分别为100%(95% CI:79.41-100.00)和100%(95% CI:75.29-100.00),而检测阻塞性黄疸的肿瘤性原因的特异性和阳性预测值分别为100%(95% CI:79.41-100.00)和100%(95% CI:75.29-100.00)。同样,非肿瘤性或肿瘤性病因的准确率为 96.67%(95% CI:82.78-99.92)。阻塞性黄疸最常见的病因是胆总管结石(33.34%),其次是胆管癌(20%)、膀胱癌(13.33%)和胆总管囊肿(13.33%)。阻塞性黄疸常见病因的诊断准确率从 82.78%到 100%不等。胆道梗阻最常见于胰腺周围区域(83.33%),其次是总胆管近端(6.67%)、肝门区(6.67%)和肝内区(3.33%)。结论MDCT 可作为诊断各种原因引起的梗阻性黄疸的初始和省时的最佳成像模式,并具有更高的准确性。它能区分阻塞性黄疸的非肿瘤性和肿瘤性病因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Nasopharyngeal tumors with unusual presentations: a retrospective analysis from Saudi Arabia Exploring the relationship between anemia in pregnancy and infant mortality: a narrative review Beyond anesthesia: exploring the underlying causes of the fungal meningitis outbreak in the US Grading the Whipple’s procedure: a strategy for structured skill advancement in surgical training Delayed presentation and management approach of autonomic dysfunction associated with severe tetanus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1