Clinical Utility of the 31-Gene Expression Profile Test on the Management of Cutaneous Melanoma by Nurse Practitioners and Physician Assistants

Renata Block, MMS, PA-C, Deborah Patterson, MMS, PA-C, Jennifer J. Siegel, PhD, Brian Martin, PhD, Ann P. Quick, PhD, Jillian Hunt, MSN, APRN, FNP-C, AOCNP
{"title":"Clinical Utility of the 31-Gene Expression Profile Test on the Management of Cutaneous Melanoma by Nurse Practitioners and Physician Assistants","authors":"Renata Block, MMS, PA-C, Deborah Patterson, MMS, PA-C, Jennifer J. Siegel, PhD, Brian Martin, PhD, Ann P. Quick, PhD, Jillian Hunt, MSN, APRN, FNP-C, AOCNP","doi":"10.6004/jadpro.2023.14.7.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The 31-gene expression profile (31-GEP) can predict the risk of recurrence and metastasis in cutaneous melanoma (CM). We assessed the viewpoints and use of 31-GEP testing by physician assistants (PAs) and nurse practitioners (NPs) for patients with CM. Methods: NPs and PAs (n = 369) completed an 18-question online survey about their viewpoints and use of the 31-GEP risk-stratification test. Results: Most practitioners (n = 334, 90.5%) felt prognostic testing improved patient care and would recommend the 31-GEP to a colleague (n = 333, 90.2%) or a friend or family member (n = 289, 78.3%) who was diagnosed with CM. The 31-GEP test was used by 176 respondents in the preceding 12 months (53%). Among users of the 31-GEP test, 78% stated that the results would impact follow-up schedule and referral, 66% overall treatment decisions, 62% sentinel lymph node biopsy recommendations, and 50% surveillance imaging. In thin tumors (″ 1 mm), 82% of 31-GEP users and 44% of nonusers stated that the 31-GEP results would impact their treatment plan decisions. Conclusion: The 31-GEP test significantly impacts treatment plans in CM, particularly for thin and stage I melanomas. Importantly, even nonusers stated that 31-GEP test results would impact treatment plans as well as recommendations to a friend or family member.","PeriodicalId":17176,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Advanced Practitioner in Oncology","volume":"62 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Advanced Practitioner in Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6004/jadpro.2023.14.7.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The 31-gene expression profile (31-GEP) can predict the risk of recurrence and metastasis in cutaneous melanoma (CM). We assessed the viewpoints and use of 31-GEP testing by physician assistants (PAs) and nurse practitioners (NPs) for patients with CM. Methods: NPs and PAs (n = 369) completed an 18-question online survey about their viewpoints and use of the 31-GEP risk-stratification test. Results: Most practitioners (n = 334, 90.5%) felt prognostic testing improved patient care and would recommend the 31-GEP to a colleague (n = 333, 90.2%) or a friend or family member (n = 289, 78.3%) who was diagnosed with CM. The 31-GEP test was used by 176 respondents in the preceding 12 months (53%). Among users of the 31-GEP test, 78% stated that the results would impact follow-up schedule and referral, 66% overall treatment decisions, 62% sentinel lymph node biopsy recommendations, and 50% surveillance imaging. In thin tumors (″ 1 mm), 82% of 31-GEP users and 44% of nonusers stated that the 31-GEP results would impact their treatment plan decisions. Conclusion: The 31-GEP test significantly impacts treatment plans in CM, particularly for thin and stage I melanomas. Importantly, even nonusers stated that 31-GEP test results would impact treatment plans as well as recommendations to a friend or family member.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
31 基因表达谱检验对执业护士和助理医师管理皮肤黑色素瘤的临床实用性
研究目的31 基因表达谱(31-GEP)可预测皮肤黑色素瘤(CM)的复发和转移风险。我们评估了医生助理(PA)和执业护士(NP)对 CM 患者进行 31-GEP 检测的观点和使用情况。方法:执业助理医师和执业护士(n = 369)完成了一项包含 18 个问题的在线调查,内容涉及他们对 31-GEP 风险分级测试的观点和使用情况。结果大多数从业人员(n = 334,90.5%)认为预后测试改善了患者护理,并会向同事(n = 333,90.2%)或确诊为 CM 的朋友或家人(n = 289,78.3%)推荐 31-GEP 测试。有 176 名受访者(53%)在过去 12 个月中使用过 31-GEP 检验。在 31-GEP 检验的使用者中,78% 的人表示检验结果会影响随访计划和转诊,66% 的人表示会影响总体治疗决策,62% 的人表示会影响前哨淋巴结活检建议,50% 的人表示会影响监测成像。对于较薄的肿瘤(1 毫米以下),82% 的 31-GEP 用户和 44% 的非用户表示 31-GEP 结果将影响他们的治疗计划决策。结论:31-GEP 检验对中医治疗方案有重大影响,尤其是对薄型黑色素瘤和 I 期黑色素瘤。重要的是,即使是非用户也表示 31-GEP 检测结果会影响治疗计划以及对朋友或家人的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Multiple Myeloma: A Call to Action A Real-World Evidence Primer for Advanced Practice Providers: Integrating P-Reality X Into Shared Decision-Making for People With HR+/HER2− Metastatic Breast Cancer Impact of an Oncology Clinical Pharmacist Intervention on Clinical Trial Enrollment in The US Oncology Network’s MYLUNG Consortium Beyond Standard Endocrine Therapy: A New Adjuvant Treatment in High-Risk Early Breast Cancer Evaluating the User-Perceived Benefit of a Virtual Lung Cancer Patient Education and Support Community: LVNG With Lung Cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1