{"title":"Finding Common Barriers and Facilitators for Cervical Cancer Screening in Sexual and Gender Diverse People: An Integrative Review","authors":"Isabel J. Francis","doi":"10.1353/hpu.2023.a912711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Background. Sexual and gender diverse (SGD) people have lower rates of cervical cancer screening than cisgender, heterosexual people, putting them at greater risk for disease. Few, if any, studies have examined facilitators and barriers to cervical cancer screening common to all subgroups of SGD people with a cervix. Methods. An integrative review regarding cervical cancer screening by SGD people was conducted using Whittemore and Knafl's framework. The National Institutes of Health's Sexual and Gender Minorities Health Disparities Research Framework was used to interpret the findings. An electronic database search identified 17 peer-reviewed articles for inclusion. Results. Quantitative and qualitative studies and reviews took various approaches. Barriers common to all subgroups exist at the personal, interpersonal, community, and societal levels, including lack of insurance, lack of primary care provider, poor provider communication, discrimination, and insufficient provider education. Conclusion. Identification of common barriers and facilitators can be used to enhance educational curricula and intervention development to increase cervical cancer screening among SGD people.","PeriodicalId":48101,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved","volume":"20 1","pages":"1157 - 1177"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu.2023.a912711","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract:Background. Sexual and gender diverse (SGD) people have lower rates of cervical cancer screening than cisgender, heterosexual people, putting them at greater risk for disease. Few, if any, studies have examined facilitators and barriers to cervical cancer screening common to all subgroups of SGD people with a cervix. Methods. An integrative review regarding cervical cancer screening by SGD people was conducted using Whittemore and Knafl's framework. The National Institutes of Health's Sexual and Gender Minorities Health Disparities Research Framework was used to interpret the findings. An electronic database search identified 17 peer-reviewed articles for inclusion. Results. Quantitative and qualitative studies and reviews took various approaches. Barriers common to all subgroups exist at the personal, interpersonal, community, and societal levels, including lack of insurance, lack of primary care provider, poor provider communication, discrimination, and insufficient provider education. Conclusion. Identification of common barriers and facilitators can be used to enhance educational curricula and intervention development to increase cervical cancer screening among SGD people.
摘要:背景。性取向和性别多元化(SGD)人群的宫颈癌筛查率低于同性异性人群,这使他们面临更大的患病风险。很少有研究(如果有的话)对所有有宫颈的 SGD 亚群进行宫颈癌筛查的促进因素和障碍进行研究。研究方法我们采用 Whittemore 和 Knafl 的框架,对新加坡残疾人的宫颈癌筛查情况进行了综合审查。美国国立卫生研究院(National Institutes of Health)的 "性与性别少数群体健康差异研究框架"(Sex and Gender Minorities Health Disparities Research Framework)被用来解释研究结果。通过电子数据库搜索,确定了 17 篇经同行评审的文章供纳入研究。结果。定量和定性研究及综述采用了不同的方法。所有亚群体在个人、人际、社区和社会层面都存在障碍,包括缺乏保险、缺乏初级保健提供者、提供者沟通不畅、歧视和提供者教育不足。结论找出共同的障碍和促进因素可用于加强教育课程和干预措施的开发,以提高新加坡广东人的宫颈癌筛查率。
期刊介绍:
The journal has as its goal the dissemination of information on the health of, and health care for, low income and other medically underserved communities to health care practitioners, policy makers, and community leaders who are in a position to effect meaningful change. Issues dealt with include access to, quality of, and cost of health care.