Optimizing artificial intelligence in sepsis management: Opportunities in the present and looking closely to the future

Darragh O'Reilly , Jennifer McGrath , Ignacio Martin-Loeches
{"title":"Optimizing artificial intelligence in sepsis management: Opportunities in the present and looking closely to the future","authors":"Darragh O'Reilly ,&nbsp;Jennifer McGrath ,&nbsp;Ignacio Martin-Loeches","doi":"10.1016/j.jointm.2023.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Sepsis remains a major challenge internationally for healthcare systems. Its incidence is rising due to poor public awareness and delays in its recognition and subsequent management. In sepsis, mortality increases with every hour left untreated. Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming worldwide healthcare delivery at present. This review has outlined how AI can augment strategies to address this global disease burden. AI and machine learning (ML) algorithms can analyze vast quantities of increasingly complex clinical datasets from electronic medical records to assist clinicians in diagnosing and treating sepsis earlier than traditional methods. Our review highlights how these models can predict the risk of sepsis and organ failure even before it occurs. This gives providers additional time to plan and execute treatment plans, thereby avoiding increasing complications associated with delayed diagnosis of sepsis. The potential for cost savings with AI implementation is also discussed, including improving workflow efficiencies, reducing administrative costs, and improving healthcare outcomes. Despite these advantages, clinicians have been slow to adopt AI into clinical practice. Some of the limitations posed by AI solutions include the lack of diverse data sets for model building so that they are widely applicable for routine clinical use. Furthermore, the subsequent algorithms are often based on complex mathematics leading to clinician hesitancy to embrace such technologies. Finally, we highlight the need for robust political and regulatory frameworks in this area to achieve the trust and approval of clinicians and patients to implement this transformational technology.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73799,"journal":{"name":"Journal of intensive medicine","volume":"4 1","pages":"Pages 34-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667100X23000816/pdfft?md5=f14061017e65ccf19b8b13fe0858f566&pid=1-s2.0-S2667100X23000816-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of intensive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667100X23000816","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sepsis remains a major challenge internationally for healthcare systems. Its incidence is rising due to poor public awareness and delays in its recognition and subsequent management. In sepsis, mortality increases with every hour left untreated. Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming worldwide healthcare delivery at present. This review has outlined how AI can augment strategies to address this global disease burden. AI and machine learning (ML) algorithms can analyze vast quantities of increasingly complex clinical datasets from electronic medical records to assist clinicians in diagnosing and treating sepsis earlier than traditional methods. Our review highlights how these models can predict the risk of sepsis and organ failure even before it occurs. This gives providers additional time to plan and execute treatment plans, thereby avoiding increasing complications associated with delayed diagnosis of sepsis. The potential for cost savings with AI implementation is also discussed, including improving workflow efficiencies, reducing administrative costs, and improving healthcare outcomes. Despite these advantages, clinicians have been slow to adopt AI into clinical practice. Some of the limitations posed by AI solutions include the lack of diverse data sets for model building so that they are widely applicable for routine clinical use. Furthermore, the subsequent algorithms are often based on complex mathematics leading to clinician hesitancy to embrace such technologies. Finally, we highlight the need for robust political and regulatory frameworks in this area to achieve the trust and approval of clinicians and patients to implement this transformational technology.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
优化败血症管理中的人工智能:把握机遇,展望未来
败血症仍然是国际医疗系统面临的一大挑战。由于公众对败血症的认识不足,以及对其识别和后续管理的延误,败血症的发病率正在上升。在败血症患者中,每有一小时未得到治疗,死亡率就会增加。目前,人工智能(AI)正在改变全球的医疗服务。本综述概述了人工智能如何增强应对这一全球性疾病负担的战略。人工智能和机器学习(ML)算法可以分析来自电子病历的大量日益复杂的临床数据集,从而协助临床医生比传统方法更早地诊断和治疗败血症。我们的综述重点介绍了这些模型如何在脓毒症和器官衰竭发生之前预测其风险。这就为医疗服务提供者提供了更多的时间来规划和执行治疗计划,从而避免因脓毒症诊断延迟而增加并发症。此外,还讨论了实施人工智能节省成本的潜力,包括提高工作流程效率、降低管理成本和改善医疗效果。尽管人工智能具有这些优势,但临床医生在临床实践中采用人工智能的速度一直很慢。人工智能解决方案的一些局限性包括缺乏用于建立模型的多样化数据集,因此无法广泛应用于常规临床。此外,随后的算法通常基于复杂的数学,导致临床医生在接受此类技术时犹豫不决。最后,我们强调在这一领域需要强有力的政治和监管框架,以获得临床医生和患者的信任和认可,从而实施这一变革性技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of intensive medicine
Journal of intensive medicine Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
58 days
期刊最新文献
Advancing understanding and management of invasive fungal diseases in the intensive care unit: Insights from FUNDICU consensus definitions Investigating computational models for diagnosis and prognosis of sepsis based on clinical parameters: Opportunities, challenges, and future research directions Association between hyperglycemia at ICU admission and postoperative acute kidney injury in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: Analysis of the MIMIC-IV database Adaptive platform trials in critical care Metabolomic profiling and prognostication in COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1