Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties testing of the Persian version of the neonatal palliative care attitude scale

Mansoureh Ashghali Farahani , Hamid Sharif-Nia , Aida Safaiee Fakhr , Marjan Banazadeh
{"title":"Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties testing of the Persian version of the neonatal palliative care attitude scale","authors":"Mansoureh Ashghali Farahani ,&nbsp;Hamid Sharif-Nia ,&nbsp;Aida Safaiee Fakhr ,&nbsp;Marjan Banazadeh","doi":"10.1016/j.jnn.2023.10.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study aimed to translate/validate NiPCAS for use among Iranian NICU<span> nurses. The 26-item NiPCAS was translated into Persian and evaluated for validity and reliability. 230 nurses participated. The NiPCAS-P demonstrated satisfactory face/content validity, with appropriate, clear, and relevant items. The overall test-retest reliability was good. Cronbach's alpha<span> for the three factors (“resources,” “organization,” and “personal experiences/beliefs”) were acceptable. Out of 26 items, 15 loaded on the three factors, explaining 35.75% of the variance. The 15-item NiPCAS-P is a valid tool for examining the attitudes of Iranian NICU nurses towards neonatal palliative care barriers/facilitators. However, the “personal experiences/beliefs” factor may not be as reliable as the other two factors. Developing a context-specific questionnaire to assess nurses' experiences/beliefs in this area is recommended. Similar implications exist for countries with comparable contexts. Research needs to adapt NiPCAS for cross-cultural use and create additional tools to explore multi-dimensional factors affecting the implementation of neonatal palliative care factors.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":35482,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neonatal Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neonatal Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1355184123001709","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to translate/validate NiPCAS for use among Iranian NICU nurses. The 26-item NiPCAS was translated into Persian and evaluated for validity and reliability. 230 nurses participated. The NiPCAS-P demonstrated satisfactory face/content validity, with appropriate, clear, and relevant items. The overall test-retest reliability was good. Cronbach's alpha for the three factors (“resources,” “organization,” and “personal experiences/beliefs”) were acceptable. Out of 26 items, 15 loaded on the three factors, explaining 35.75% of the variance. The 15-item NiPCAS-P is a valid tool for examining the attitudes of Iranian NICU nurses towards neonatal palliative care barriers/facilitators. However, the “personal experiences/beliefs” factor may not be as reliable as the other two factors. Developing a context-specific questionnaire to assess nurses' experiences/beliefs in this area is recommended. Similar implications exist for countries with comparable contexts. Research needs to adapt NiPCAS for cross-cultural use and create additional tools to explore multi-dimensional factors affecting the implementation of neonatal palliative care factors.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新生儿姑息关怀态度量表波斯语版的跨文化改编和心理特性测试
本研究旨在翻译/验证伊朗新生儿重症监护病房护士使用的 NiPCAS。该研究将 26 个项目的 NiPCAS 翻译成了波斯语,并对其有效性和可靠性进行了评估。共有 230 名护士参与。NiPCAS-P显示出令人满意的面效/内容效度,项目适当、清晰且相关。总体测试-重测信度良好。三个因子("资源"、"组织 "和 "个人经历/信念")的 Cronbach's alpha 值均可接受。在 26 个项目中,有 15 个项目与三个因子相关,解释了 35.75% 的方差。15 个项目的 NiPCAS-P 是研究伊朗新生儿重症监护室护士对新生儿姑息治疗障碍/促进因素的态度的有效工具。然而,"个人经历/信念 "因子可能不如其他两个因子可靠。建议制定一份针对具体情况的问卷,以评估护士在这方面的经验/信念。具有可比背景的国家也有类似的影响。研究需要对NiPCAS进行调整,以便跨文化使用,并开发更多工具来探索影响新生儿姑息关怀实施的多维因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neonatal Nursing
Journal of Neonatal Nursing Nursing-Pediatrics
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
143
期刊介绍: Aims & Scope: This is the practical, bimonthly, research-based journal for all professionals concerned with the care of neonates and their families, both in hospital and the community. It aims to support the development of the essential practice, management, education and health promotion skills required by these professionals. The JNN will provide a forum for the exchange of ideas and information between the range of professionals working in this field; promote cooperation between these professionals; facilitate partnership care with families; provide information and informed opinion; promote innovation and change in the care of neonates and their families; and provide an education resource for this important rapidly developing field.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Autumnal thinking Neonatal Nurses Association (NNA) News Page Council of International Neonatal Nurses (COINN) News Page Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1